Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
In Seok Lee 3 Articles
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections
Chi Hyuk Oh, Jun Kyu Lee, Tae Jun Song, Jin-Seok Park, Jae Min Lee, Jun Hyuk Son, Dong Kee Jang, Miyoung Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, In Seok Lee, Soo Teik Lee, Ho Soon Choi, Ho Gak Kim, Hoon Jai Chun, Chan Guk Park, Joo Young Cho
Clin Endosc 2021;54(4):505-521.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.185
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) appointed a Task Force to develope medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pancreatic Pseudocyst after Fully Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent Placement: A Case Report
    Mitsuhito Koizumi, Sho Ishikawa, Kaori Marui, Masahito Kokubu, Yusuke Okujima, Yuki Numata, Yoshiki Imamura, Teru Kumagi, Yoichi Hiasa
    Internal Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin for the Differentiation of Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions
    Miruna Patricia Olar, Maria Iacobescu, Sorana D. Bolboacă, Cristina Pojoga, Ofelia Moșteanu, Radu Seicean, Ioana Rusu, Oana Banc, Cristina Adela Iuga, Andrada Seicean
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(6): 3224.     CrossRef
  • Comparative outcome of single versus two double-pigtail stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with minimal necrosis: a retrospective analysis
    S Giri, S Bhrugumalla, S Gangadhar, S Angadi
    Acta Gastro Enterologica Belgica.2024; 87(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Use of an endoscopic powered debridement device for treatment of post-surgical fatty pancreatic necrosis
    Judy Daboul, Shiab Mussad, Anna Cecilia Amaral, Waleed K. Hussain, Peter J. Lee, Samuel Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 412.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for local complications related to pancreatitis
    Hyung Ku Chon, Seong-Hun Kim
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2023; 12(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • A preferable modality for the differentiation of peripancreatic fluid collections: Endoscopic ultrasound
    Ning Xu, Longsong Li, Danqi Zhao, Zixin Wang, Xueting Wang, Runzi Wang, Yanbo Zeng, Lei Zhang, Ning Zhong, Ying Lv, Enqiang Linghu, Ningli Chai
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(4): 291.     CrossRef
  • Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in acute pancreatitis
    A.V. Fedorov, V.N. Ektov, M.A. Khodorkovsky
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (8): 83.     CrossRef
  • Single balloon enteroscopy-guided endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the treatment of a symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst complicated by pancreaticojejunostomy stricture: A case report
    Eunae Cho, Chang-Hwan Park, Seo Yeon Cho
    Medicine.2022; 101(43): e31293.     CrossRef
  • 4,984 View
  • 221 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Performance and Clinical Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Intramural Lesions
Hea Jung Sung, Yu Kyung Cho, Eun Young Park, Sung Jin Moon, Chul Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Kyu Yong Choi
Clin Endosc 2013;46(6):627-632.   Published online November 19, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.627
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions.

Methods

Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging.

Results

Forty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 males) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Feasibility and clinical value of linear endoscopic ultrasonography imaging in the lower gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
    Li Tao, Yajun Chen, Qianqian Fang, Fan Xu, Qianwei Yu, Lijiu Zhang, Xiangpeng Hu
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumors: Impact of rapid onsite evaluation and correlation with histopathologic follow‐up
    Syed M. Gilani, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Harry R. Aslanian, Guoping Cai
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
    Eun Young Kim
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy without Rapid On-Site Cytologic Examination: A Time to Change the Paradigm?
    Yeon Suk Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(3): 207.     CrossRef
  • 5,908 View
  • 48 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps
Chul-Hyun Lim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Won Chul Kim, Jin Soo Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Kyu Yong Choi, In-Sik Chung
Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):62-66.   Published online March 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy.

Methods

Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue.

Results

Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps.

Conclusions

Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption
    Alessandro Repici, Kareem Khalaf, Edoardo Troncone, Sharmila Subramaniam, Cesare Hassan, Pradeep Bhandari, Lars AABAKKEN, Sarah ABERE, Maisam W. AKROUSH, Abed AL-LEHIBI, Eduardo ALBÉNIZ, Asma ALKANDARI, Majid A. ALMADI, Andrea ANDERLONI, Amol BAPAYE, Napo
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(2): 322.     CrossRef
  • Single‐use accessories and endoscopes in the era of sustainability and climate change—A balancing act
    Zaheer Nabi, Raymond S. Y. Tang, Sridhar Sundaram, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Ressourcenschonung aus Sicht der Hygiene
    Susanne Kolbe-Busch, Iris F. Chaberny
    Die Chirurgie.2023; 94(3): 220.     CrossRef
  • An Economic Analysis of Direct Costs of Distal Radius Fixation and the Implications of a Disposable Distal Radius Kit
    Jonathan Lans, Ritsaart F. Westenberg, Svenna H.W.L. Verhiel, Rohit Garg, Jesse B. Jupiter, Neal C. Chen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2021; 35(9): e346.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories
    Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 276.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guidelines for Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories; Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean College of Helicobact
    Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2020; 95(5): 325.     CrossRef
  • Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
    Byoung Kwan Son, Byung-Wook Kim, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
    Byung-Wook Kim, Byoung Kwan Son, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
    The Korean Journal of Medicine.2017; 92(3): 239.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps
    J.A. Cartwright, T.L. Hill, S. Smith, D. Shaw
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2016; 30(4): 1002.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
    Young-Seok Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection
    Ji Kon Ryu, Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ki Baik Hahm
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(5): 351.     CrossRef
  • High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing
    King-Wah Chiu
    World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2015; 5(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Is non-woven fabric a useful method of packaging instruments for operation theatres in resource constrained settings?
    GS Devadiga, VMP Thomas, S Shetty, MS Setia
    Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology.2015; 33(2): 243.     CrossRef
  • Steps of Reprocessing and Equipments
    Yong Kook Lee, Jeong Bae Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2013; 46(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • 7,469 View
  • 97 Download
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP