Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
In Sik Won 1 Article
Short-term Clinical Outcomes Based on Risk Factors of Recurrence after Removing Common Bile Duct Stones with Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation
Jung Ho Kim, Yeon Suk Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Min Su Ha, Young Jun Lee, Jong Joon Lee, Sang Jin Lee, In Sik Won, Yang Suh Ku, Yun Soo Kim, Ju Hyun Kim
Clin Endosc 2011;44(2):123-128.   Published online December 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2011.44.2.123
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Recurrence is an important late complication of endotherapy of bile duct stones. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) can be used as an alternative method of removing difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to evaluate short term clinical outcomes after removing common bile duct (CBD) stones using EPLBD.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed based on the medical records of 141 patients who received EPLBD, with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy, between September 2008 and February 2010. Of these, 50 patients, were enrolled in the study. Clinical and endoscopic parameters were analyzed to identify risk factors for CBD stones recurrence.

Results

Male:Female ratio was 22:28 (mean age, 67.4±14.4 years). Recurrence rate was 24.0% (12/50). Mean follow-up period was 10.8±4.5 months. Nineteen (38.0%) had a history of surgery and 20 (40.0%) were comorbid with periampullary diverticula. Mean diameters of the stones and CBD were 13.8±4.3 mm and 20.1±7.2 mm, respectively. In univariate analysis, large CBD stones (≥12 mm) and angulated CBD (angle ≤145°) were identified as the significant predictors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, angulated CBD (angle ≤145°) was the significant independent risk factor for recurrence.

Conclusions

Close follow-up seems necessary in patients with angulated CBD (angle ≤145°).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recurrence of common bile duct stones after endoscopic clearance and its predictors: A systematic review
    Marko Kozyk, Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Manan Trivedi, Kateryna Strubchevska, Rakesh Kumar Barik, Sridhar Sundaram
    DEN Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and management of primary choledocholithiasis: a systematic review
    Jie Zhang, Xiaofeng Ling
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021; 91(4): 530.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients
    Hyung Ku Chon, Chan Park, Dong Eun Park, Tae Hyeon Kim
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2021; 20(5): 478.     CrossRef
  • Alterations of the Bile Microbiome in Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stone
    Cheng Ye, Wence Zhou, Hui Zhang, Long Miao, Gen Lv, Abdelwahab Omri
    BioMed Research International.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation for Recurrence of Bile Duct Stones
    Se Woo Park
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 76(4): 177.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation on the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Meta-analysis and Review
    Seongyul Ryu, Ik Hyun Jo, Seonhoo Kim, Yeon-Ji Kim, Woo Chul Chung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 76(4): 199.     CrossRef
  • Causes associated with recurrent choledocholithiasis following therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A large sample sized retrospective study
    Feng Deng, Mi Zhou, Ping-Ping Liu, Jun-Bo Hong, Guo-Hua Li, Xiao-Jiang Zhou, You-Xiang Chen
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2019; 7(9): 1028.     CrossRef
  • Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation
    Takao Itoi, Shomei Ryozawa, Akio Katanuma, Yoshinobu Okabe, Hironori Kato, Jun Horaguchi, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Takuji Gotoda, Naotaka Fujita, Kenjiro Yasuda, Yoshinori Igarashi, Kazuma Fujimoto
    Digestive Endoscopy.2018; 30(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Mid‐term outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large balloon dilation
    Fumihide Itokawa, Takao Itoi, Atsushi Sofuni, Toshio Kurihara, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Kentaro Ishii, Shujiro Tsuji, Nobuhito Ikeuchi, Junko Umeda, Reina Tanaka, Ryosuke Tonozuka, Mitsuyoshi Honjyo, Fuminori Moriyasu, Kazuhiko Kasuya, Akihiko Tsuchida
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2015; 30(1): 223.     CrossRef
  • Which Is the Better Treatment for the Removal of Large Biliary Stones? Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
    Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Jin Myung Park, Byeong Jun Song, Jaihwan Kim, Joo Kyung Park, Yong-Tae Kim
    Gut and Liver.2014; 8(4): 438.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for difficult common bile duct stones: Our experience
    Maddalena Zippi
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2013; 1(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • 7,701 View
  • 52 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP