Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy


Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Michael B. Wallace 4 Articles
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Disorders: A Systematic Analysis
Do Han Kim, Somashekar G. Krishna, Emmanuel Coronel, Paul T. Kröner, Herbert C. Wolfsen, Michael B. Wallace, Juan E. Corral
Clin Endosc 2022;55(2):197-207.   Published online November 29, 2021
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
/Aims: Endoscopic visualization of the microscopic anatomy can facilitate the real-time diagnosis of pancreatobiliary disorders and provide guidance for treatment. This study aimed to review the technique, image classification, and diagnostic performance of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE).
We conducted a systematic review of CLE in pancreatic and biliary ducts of humans, and have provided a narrative of the technique, image classification, diagnostic performance, ongoing research, and limitations.
Probe-based CLE differentiates malignant from benign biliary strictures (sensitivity, ≥89%; specificity, ≥61%). Needlebased CLE differentiates mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cysts (sensitivity, 59%; specificity, ≥94%) and identifies dysplasia. Pancreatitis may develop in 2-7% of pancreatic cyst cases. Needle-based CLE has potential applications in adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, and pancreatitis (chronic or autoimmune). Costs, catheter lifespan, endoscopist training, and interobserver variability are challenges for routine utilization.
CLE reveals microscopic pancreatobiliary system anatomy with adequate specificity and sensitivity. Reducing costs and simplifying image interpretation will promote utilization by advanced endoscopists.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Updates in Diagnosis and Endoscopic Management of Cholangiocarcinoma
    Roxana-Luiza Caragut, Madalina Ilie, Teodor Cabel, Deniz Günșahin, Afrodita Panaitescu, Christopher Pavel, Oana Mihaela Plotogea, Ecaterina Mihaela Rînja, Gabriel Constantinescu, Vasile Sandru
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(5): 490.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Needle-Based Confocal Endomicroscopy as a Diagnostic Imaging Biomarker for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
    Shreyas Krishna, Ahmed Abdelbaki, Phil A. Hart, Jorge D. Machicado
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1238.     CrossRef
  • American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy in biliary strictures of undetermined etiology: summary and recommendations
    Larissa L. Fujii-Lau, Nirav C. Thosani, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Jared Acoba, Curtis J. Wray, Rodrick Zvavanjanja, Stuart K. Amateau, James L. Buxbaum, Audrey H. Calderwood, Jean M. Chalhoub, Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Madhav Desai, Sherif E. Elhanafi, Douglas S
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(5): 685.     CrossRef
  • In Vivo Click Chemistry Enables Multiplexed Intravital Microscopy
    Jina Ko, Kilean Lucas, Rainer Kohler, Elias A. Halabi, Martin Wilkovitsch, Jonathan C. T. Carlson, Ralph Weissleder
    Advanced Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: Needle types, technical issues, and sample handling
    Woo Hyun Paik
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(3): 96.     CrossRef
  • 4,410 View
  • 232 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Should We Resect and Discard Low Risk Diminutive Colon Polyps
Pujan Kandel, Michael B. Wallace
Clin Endosc 2019;52(3):239-246.   Published online January 21, 2019
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Diminutive colorectal polyps <5 mm are very common and almost universally benign. The current strategy of resection with histological confirmation of all colorectal polyps is costly and may increase the risk of colonoscopy. Accurate, optical diagnosis without histology can be achieved with currently available endoscopic technologies. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations supports strategies for optical diagnosis of small non neoplastic polyps as long as two criteria are met. For hyperplastic appearing polyps <5 mm in recto-sigmoid colon, the negative predictive value should be at least 90%. For diminutive low grade adenomatous appearing polyps, a resect and discard strategy should be sufficiently accurate such that post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations based on the optical diagnosis, agree with a histologically diagnosis at least 90% of the time. Although the resect and discard as well as diagnose and leave behind approach has major benefits with regard to both safety and cost, it has yet to be used widely in practice. To fully implement such as strategy, there is a need for better-quality training, quality assurance, and patient acceptance. In the article, we will review the current state of the science on optical diagnose of colorectal polyps and its implications for colonoscopy practice.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The role of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy
    Hyun Jae Kim, Nasim Parsa, Michael F. Byrne
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 35(1): 101007.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence for characterization of colorectal polyps: Prospective multicenter study
    Glenn De Lange, Victor Prouvost, Gabriel Rahmi, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Catherine Le Berre, Sahar Mack, Thibaud Koessler, Emmanuel Coron
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(03): E413.     CrossRef
  • Ecogastroenterology: cultivating sustainable clinical excellence in an environmentally conscious landscape
    Kassem Sharif, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Paula David, Arnon Afek, Ian M Gralnek, Shomron Ben-Horin, Adi Lahat
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2024; 9(6): 550.     CrossRef
  • Rationalising the use of specimen pots following colorectal polypectomy: a small step towards greener endoscopy
    Karl King Yong, Yun He, Hoi Ching Annie Cheung, Ramya Sriskandarajah, William Jenkins, Robert Goldin, Sabina Beg
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2023; 14(4): 295.     CrossRef
  • Measurements, Algorithms, and Presentations of Reality: Framing Interactions with AI-Enabled Decision Support
    Niels van Berkel, Maura Bellio, Mikael B. Skov, Ann Blandford
    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.2023; 30(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • Real-World Validation of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Prediction of Polyp Histology in Colonoscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Study
    James Weiquan Li, Clement Chun Ho Wu, Jonathan Wei Jie Lee, Raymond Liang, Gwyneth Shook Ting Soon, Lai Mun Wang, Xuan Han Koh, Calvin Jianyi Koh, Wei Da Chew, Kenneth Weicong Lin, Mann Yie Thian, Ronnie Matthew, Guowei Kim, Christopher Jen Lock Khor, Kwo
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(8): 1353.     CrossRef
  • The Utility of Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification in Predicting the Histologies of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using I-Scan Optical Enhancement: A Prospective Study
    Yeo Wool Kang, Jong Hoon Lee, Jong Yoon Lee
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(16): 2720.     CrossRef
  • Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using novel blue light imaging classification among trainee endoscopists
    Christopher Koehn, Douglas K. Rex, Jimmy Allen, Umer Bhatti, Indira Bhavsar‐Burke, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Abhishek Challa, Abhiram Duvvuri, Lara Dakhoul, John Ha, Nour Hamade, S. Bradley Hicks, Claire Jansson‐Knodell, Edward Krajicek, Shanke
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(1): 191.     CrossRef
  • Too Good to Be True? Evaluation of Colonoscopy Sensitivity Assumptions Used in Policy Models
    Carolyn M. Rutter, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Jeffrey K. Lee, Jonathan Ozik
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2022; 31(4): 775.     CrossRef
  • Non-optical polyp-based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study
    Mahsa Taghiakbari, Celia Hammar, Mira Frenn, Roupen Djinbachian, Heiko Pohl, Erik Deslandres, Simon Bouchard, Mickael Bouin, Daniel von Renteln
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(19): 2137.     CrossRef
  • No-Code Platform-Based Deep-Learning Models for Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Histology from White-Light Endoscopy Images: Development and Performance Verification
    Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Seung In Seo, Young Joo Yang, Gwang Ho Baik, Jong Wook Kim
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(6): 963.     CrossRef
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a narrative review of current data and clinical applications
    JW Li, LM Wang, TL Ang
    Singapore Medical Journal.2022; 63(3): 118.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the Volume and Distribution of Training Datasets in the Development of Deep-Learning Models for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in Endoscopy Images
    Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Young Joo Yang, Gwang Ho Baik
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(9): 1361.     CrossRef
  • How to safely apply a 'Resect and Discard' policy for small colorectal polyps–real‐world data comparing endoscopic polyp evaluation and subsequent histological outcome
    Georgios Marinopoulos, Maja Kopczynska, Robert Clark, Nadeem Sarwar, Yeng Ang, Arash Assadsangabi
    GastroHep.2021; 3(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Colon Lesion Differentiation under Deep Learning
    Cristina L. Saratxaga, Jorge Bote, Juan F. Ortega-Morán, Artzai Picón, Elena Terradillos, Nagore Arbide del Río, Nagore Andraka, Estibaliz Garrote, Olga M. Conde
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(7): 3119.     CrossRef
  • Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps
    Ahmed Amine Alaoui, Kussil Oumedjbeur, Roupen Djinbachian, Étienne Marchand, Paola N. Marques, Mickael Bouin, Simon Bouchard, Daniel von Renteln
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(05): E684.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy and artificial intelligence: Bridging the gap or a gap needing to be bridged?
    Tiing Leong Ang, James Weiquan Li
    Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2021; 2(2): 36.     CrossRef
  • RNA-sequencing identification and validation of genes differentially expressed in high-risk adenoma, advanced colorectal cancer, and normal controls
    Namjoo Kim, Jeong-An Gim, Beom Jae Lee, Byung il Choi, Seung Bin Park, Hee Sook Yoon, Sang Hee Kang, Seung Han Kim, Moon Kyung Joo, Jong-Jae Park, Chungyeul Kim, Han-Kyeom Kim
    Functional & Integrative Genomics.2021; 21(3-4): 513.     CrossRef
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps in Endoscopic Images: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee, Gwang Ho Baik
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(8): e29682.     CrossRef
  • Automatic image and text-based description for colorectal polyps using BASIC classification
    Roger Fonollà, Quirine E.W. van der Zander, Ramon M. Schreuder, Sharmila Subramaniam, Pradeep Bhandari, Ad A.M. Masclee, Erik J. Schoon, Fons van der Sommen, Peter H.N. de With
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2021; 121: 102178.     CrossRef
  • Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
    Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Diminutive Polyps in the Colon
    Iness Soltani, Daniel von Renteln
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2020; 18(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial
    Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Morten Kobaek-Larsen, Anne-Line Volden Havshoi, Erik Zimmermann-Nielsen, Marianne Kirstine Thygesen, Rasmus Kroijer, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, Gunnar Baatrup
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2020; 7(1): e000411.     CrossRef
  • A CNN CADx System for Multimodal Classification of Colorectal Polyps Combining WL, BLI, and LCI Modalities
    Roger Fonollà, Quirine E. W. van der Zander, Ramon M. Schreuder, Ad A. M. Masclee, Erik J. Schoon, Fons van der Sommen, Peter H. N. de With
    Applied Sciences.2020; 10(15): 5040.     CrossRef
  • UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations

    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2019; 7(S8): 189.     CrossRef
  • 9,483 View
  • 281 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer
Recent Advance in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: What’s New?
Sung Noh Hong, Sun-Hyung Kang, Hyun Joo Jang, Michael B. Wallace
Clin Endosc 2018;51(4):334-343.   Published online July 31, 2018
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a relatively new diagnostic procedure for patients with suspected colonic diseases. This convenient,noninvasive method enables the physician to explore the entire colon without significant discomfort to the patient. However, while CCEcan be performed painlessly without bowel air insufflation, the need for vigorous bowel preparation and other technical limitationsexist. Due to such limitations, CCE has not replaced conventional colonoscopy. In this review, we discuss historical and recentadvances in CCE including technical issues, ideal bowel preparation, indications and contraindications and highlight further technicaladvancements and clinical studies which are needed to develop CCE as a potential diagnostic tool.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multi-dimensional readiness assessment of medical devices
    Rosemary Ruiz Seva, Angela Li Sin Tan, Lourdes Marie Sequerra Tejero, Maria Lourdes Dorothy S. Salvacion
    Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.2023; 24(2): 189.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Transit Times in Health as Determined Using Ingestible Capsule Systems: A Systematic Review
    Gursharan Kaur Nandhra, Phakanant Chaichanavichkij, Malcolm Birch, S. Mark Scott
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(16): 5272.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Detection Using a New Preparation-Free, Colon-Scan Capsule: A Pilot Study of Safety and Patient Satisfaction
    Ana Garcia Garcia de Paredes, Seth A. Gross, Ariosto H. Hernandez-Lara, Stephanie L. Hansel, David M. Poppers, Elizabeth Rajan
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(8): 4070.     CrossRef
  • Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer
    Aneta L. Zygulska, Piotr Pierzchalski
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(2): 852.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Liver Disease
    Alexander Ross Robertson, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Emanuele Rondonotti, Mauro Bruno, Marco Pennazio
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2021; 31(2): 363.     CrossRef
  • Capsule Endoscopy in Children
    Stanley A. Cohen, Salvatore Oliva
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
    Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Assessment of Mucosal Healing in Crohn’s Disease
    Isabella Papalia, Douglas Tjandra, Stephanie Quah, Christina Tan, Alexandra Gorelik, Suresh Sivanesan, Finlay Macrae
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2021; 27(Supplement): S25.     CrossRef
  • Applicability of colon capsule endoscopy as pan-endoscopy: From bowel preparation, transit, and rating times to completion rate and patient acceptance
    Fanny E.R. Vuik, Sarah Moen, Stella A.V. Nieuwenburg, Eline H. Schreuders, Ernst J. Kuipers, Manon C.W. Spaander
    Endoscopy International Open.2021; 09(12): E1852.     CrossRef
  • Development and Application of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Gastric Lesions
    Yaoping Zhang, Yanning Zhang, Xiaojun Huang, Amosy M'Koma
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Sticking to the Problem: Engineering Adhesion in Molecular Endoscopic Imaging
    Mahboubeh S. Noori, Sarah J. Bodle, Christian A. Showalter, Evan S. Streator, David S. Drozek, Monica M. Burdick, Douglas J. Goetz
    Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering.2020; 13(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • Colon capsule endoscopy
    C. MacLeod, E. Monaghan, A. Banerjee, P. Jenkinson, R. Falconer, G. Ramsay, A.J.M. Watson
    The Surgeon.2020; 18(4): 251.     CrossRef
  • Stool‐based DNA testing versus colon capsule endoscopy for colorectal cancer screening during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a response to ‘Colon capsule endoscopy: an innovative method for detecting colorectal pathology during the COVID‐19 pandemic?’
    A. G. Dockter, G. C. Angelos
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(9): 1027.     CrossRef
    Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology.2020; 20(07): 2050041.     CrossRef
  • Pan-enteric capsule for bleeding high-risk patients. Can we limit endoscopies?
    Cristina Carretero Ribon, César Prieto-Frías, Ramon Angos, Maite Betés , Maite Herráiz Bayod, Susana de la Riva Onandía, Francisco Zozaya, María Fernandez-Calderon, Iago Rodríguez - Lago, Miguel Muñoz Navas
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A New Tool for Cancer Screening in the Colon With Deep-Learning-Based Polyp Recognition
    Xiao Jia, Xiaohan Xing, Yixuan Yuan, Lei Xing, Max Q.-H. Meng
    Proceedings of the IEEE.2020; 108(1): 178.     CrossRef
  • Bleeding Meckel Diverticulum: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Enterography Findings
    Ying Chen, Yonghua Tang, Chunhong Hu, Shuangqing Chen
    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.2019; 43(2): 220.     CrossRef
  • 7,358 View
  • 124 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Bashar Qumseya, Abraham M. Panossian, Cynthia Rizk, David Cangemi, Christianne Wolfsen, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy Woodward, Michael B. Wallace, Herbert Wolfsen
Clin Endosc 2014;47(2):155-161.   Published online March 31, 2014
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied.


We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors.


Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37) had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44) needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007).


Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.


Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Simplified Versus Standard Radiofrequency Ablation Protocols for Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sagar Shah, Mary Kathryn Roccato, Samuel Ji, Neil Jariwalla, Spencer Kozik, Ronald Dungca Ortizo, Anastasia Chahine, Jennifer M. Kolb, Jason B. Samarasena
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • A reliable nomogram model for predicting esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Guodong Yang, Zhao Mu, Ke Pu, Yulin Chen, Luoyao Zhang, Haiyue Zhou, Peng Luo, Xiaoying Zhang
    Medicine.2022; 101(5): e28741.     CrossRef
  • Management of esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection for early neoplasia
    Einas Abou Ali, Arthur Belle, Rachel Hallit, Benoit Terris, Frédéric Beuvon, Mahaut Leconte, Anthony Dohan, Sarah Leblanc, Solène Dermine, Lola-Jade Palmieri, Romain Coriat, Stanislas Chaussade, Maximilien Barret
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2021; 14: 175628482098529.     CrossRef
  • Lesion size and circumferential range identified as independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Meihong Chen, Yini Dang, Chao Ding, Jiajia Yang, Xinmin Si, Guoxin Zhang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(9): 4065.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for serious adverse events associated with multiband mucosectomy in Barrett’s esophagus: an international multicenter analysis of 3827 endoscopic resection procedures
    Kamar Belghazi, Norman Marcon, Christopher Teshima, Kenneth K. Wang, Reza V. Milano, Nahid Mostafavi, Michael B. Wallace, Pujan Kandel, Lady Katherine Mejía Pérez, Michael J. Bourke, Farzan Bahin, Martin A. Everson, Rehan Haidry, Gregory G. Ginsberg, Gene
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(2): 259.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Resection in the Management of Esophageal Neoplasia
    Don C. Codipilly, Prasad G. Iyer
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2020; 18(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Issues and controversies in esophageal inlet patch
    Adriana Ciocalteu, Petrica Popa, Mircea Ionescu, Dan Ionut Gheonea
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(30): 4061.     CrossRef
  • Radiofrequency ablation in patients with large cervical heterotopic gastric mucosa and globus sensation: Closing the treatment gap
    Ivan Kristo, Erwin Rieder, Matthias Paireder, Katrin Schwameis, Gerd Jomrich, Werner Dolak, Thomas Parzefall, Martin Riegler, Reza Asari, Sebastian F. Schoppmann
    Digestive Endoscopy.2018; 30(2): 212.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett’s neoplasia: a meta-analysis
    Dennis Yang, Fei Zou, Sican Xiong, Justin J. Forde, Yu Wang, Peter V. Draganov
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(6): 1383.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett’s esophagus: Adverse outcomes, patient values, and cost-effectiveness
    Swarup Kumar, Prasad G. Iyer
    Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 20(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in Barrett's esophagus
    John Inadomi, Hani Alastal, Luigi Bonavina, Seth Gross, Richard H. Hunt, Hiroshi Mashimo, Massimiliano di Pietro, Horace Rhee, Marmy Shah, Salvatore Tolone, David H. Wang, Shao‐Hua Xie
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2018; 1434(1): 227.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal cancer: Where do we go from here?
    Tavankit Singh, Madhusudhan R Sanaka, Prashanthi N Thota
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 10(9): 165.     CrossRef
  • Ablation Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus: New Rules for Changing Times
    Nour Hamade, Prateek Sharma
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Resection and Ablation for Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer
    Stephanie Worrell, Steven R. DeMeester
    Thoracic Surgery Clinics.2016; 26(2): 173.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus
    Ashley H. Davis-Yadley, Kevin G. Neill, Mokenge P. Malafa, Luis R. Peña
    Cancer Control.2016; 23(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection
    Joo Ha Hwang, Vani Konda, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, Shailendra S. Chauhan, Brintha K. Enestvedt, Larissa L. Fujii-Lau, Sri Komanduri, John T. Maple, Faris M. Murad, Rahul Pannala, Nirav C. Thosani, Subhas Banerjee
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 82(2): 215.     CrossRef
  • When Is Pre-Emptive Treatment Necessary after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Early Esophageal Neoplasm?
    Hyung Gil Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(2): 124.     CrossRef
  • 8,277 View
  • 61 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer