Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
Ryoji Fujii 1 Article
Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study
Yutaka Okagawa, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Yusuke Tomita, Shutaro Oiwa, Fumihiro Ogata, Takashi Jin, Masahiro Yoshida, Ryoji Fujii, Takeyoshi Minagawa, Kohtaro Morita, Hideyuki Ihara, Michiaki Hirayama, Hitoshi Kondo
Clin Endosc 2020;53(3):339-345.   Published online January 10, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.124
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than that of colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented, especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however, no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the present study retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees.
Methods
This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by three trainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups.
Results
The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36 vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubation time. No major complications occurred in either group.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study
    Mohammed Sherif Naguib, Ahmed Khairy, Hany Shehab, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdel Meguid Kassem
    Arab Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 25(2): 102.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Assist Devices on Colonic Adenoma Detection
    Simcha Weissman, Tej I. Mehta, Daniel J. Stein, Kartikeya Tripathi, Nathan Rosenwald, Sindhura Kolli, Muhammad Aziz, Joseph D. Feuerstein
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 56(10): 889.     CrossRef
  • Accessories to Enhance Adenoma Detection Rates: Is the Endocuff Better than the Conventional Cap for Trainees?
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Sang-Bum Kang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 251.     CrossRef
  • Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ai Li, Jing‐Ze Yang, Xiao‐Xiao Yang, Bing‐Cheng Feng, Ming‐Ming Zhang, Jun‐Yan Qu, Ru‐Chen Zhou, Peng Wang, Li‐Xiang Li, Xiu‐Li Zuo, Yan‐Qing Li
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 35(12): 2066.     CrossRef
  • 4,778 View
  • 121 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP