-
Feasibility of single-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant recipients with abnormal liver function tests
-
Samuel Han, Sajid Jalil, Jeffery R. Groce, Somashekar G. Krishna, Luis Lara, Peter J. Lee, Georgios I. Papachristou, Khalid Mumtaz
-
Clin Endosc 2023;56(6):823-826. Published online March 13, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.134
-
-
PDFPubReaderePub
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy Is Safe and Effective in Post Liver Transplant Patients
JOSHUA L. HUDSON, AMY BROWNLEE, NEIL D. SHAH, TODD H. BARON Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 26(4): 359. CrossRef - Insights and perspectives: EUS in post-liver transplantation care
Eyad Gadour, Bogdan Miutescu, Hussein Hassan Okasha Endoscopic Ultrasound.2024; 13(5): 283. CrossRef - Endo-Hepatology: The Buzz Goes Much beyond Liver Biopsy—A Narrative Review
Rajesh Puri, Zubin Sharma, Swapnil Dhampalwar, Abhishek Kathuria, Bimal Sahu Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(04): 227. CrossRef
-
2,068
View
-
112
Download
-
2
Web of Science
-
3
Crossref
-
Quality Indicators in Barrett’s Esophagus: Time to Change the Status Quo
-
Samuel Han, Sachin Wani
-
Clin Endosc 2018;51(4):344-351. Published online July 31, 2018
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.099
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- The push for high quality care in all fields of medicine highlights the importance of establishing and adhering to quality indicators.In response, several gastrointestinal societies have established quality indicators specific to Barrett’s esophagus, which serve to createthresholds for performance while standardizing practice and guiding value-based care. Recent studies, however, have consistentlydemonstrated the lack of adherence to these quality indicators, particularly in surveillance (appropriate utilization of endoscopy andobtaining biopsies using the Seattle protocol) and endoscopic eradication therapy practices. These findings suggest that innovativeinterventions are needed to address these shortcomings in order to deliver high quality care to patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders
Alexander T Reddy, Joshua P Lee, David A Leiman Diseases of the Esophagus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett’s Esophagus
Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2023; 6(4): 137. CrossRef - Clinical variation in surveillance and management of Barrett’s esophagus: A cross-sectional study of gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons
Jamielyn DC Cruz, David Paculdo, Divya Ganesan, Meredith Baker, Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne, Nicholas J Shaheen, Sachin Wani, John W Peabody Medicine.2022; 101(51): e32187. CrossRef - Risk Factors for Self-Expandable Metal Stent Complications in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review
Connor K. Wilson, Sara R. Frankowski, Susan C. Steelman, Issam Makhoul SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2020; 2(8): 1163. CrossRef
-
6,231
View
-
108
Download
-
4
Web of Science
-
4
Crossref
|