Barrett’s esophagus is associated with an increased risk of adenocarcinoma. Thorough screening during endoscopic surveillance is crucial to improve patient prognosis. Detecting and characterizing dysplastic or neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus during routine endoscopy are challenging, even for expert endoscopists. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems have been developed to provide additional assistance to physicians performing diagnostic and therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy. In this article, we review the current role of artificial intelligence in the management of Barrett’s esophagus and elaborate on potential artificial intelligence in the future.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Artificial intelligence in functional gastrointestinal disorders: From precision diagnosis to preventive healthcare Yi-Nan Yan, Jing-Qi Zeng, Xia Ding Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial intelligence for computer assistance in endoscopic procedures and training Pablo Achurra, Domingo Mery, Arnoldo Riquelme, Chaya Shwaartz Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Telemedizin und KI-gestützte Diagnostik im Alltag der Viszeralmedizin Matthias Grade, Verena Uslar Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(1): 23. CrossRef
The current state of artificial intelligence in robotic esophageal surgery Constantine M. Poulos, Ryan Cassidy, Eamon Khatibifar, Erik Holzwanger, Lana Schumacher Mini-invasive Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Image-Based Diagnosis of Early Esophageal and Gastric Neoplasms Alanna Ebigbo, Helmut Messmann, Sung Hak Lee Gastroenterology.2025; 169(3): 396. CrossRef
Future of image enhanced endoscopy of esophageal adenocarcinoma Kerem Parlar, Mert Cakir, Ozlem Ozer, Prateek Sharma Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(4): 503. CrossRef
Endoskopische Therapie von Barrett-Neoplasien und Magenfrühkarzinomen Florian Berreth, Jan Peveling-Oberhag, Jörg G. Albert best practice onkologie.2024; 19(1-2): 28. CrossRef
The Role of Screening and Early Detection in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Jin Woo Yoo, Monika Laszkowska, Robin B. Mendelsohn Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America.2024; 38(3): 693. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: where are we and where are we going? Laurence B Lovat Gastrointestinal Nursing.2024; 22(Sup3): S6. CrossRef
As how artificial intelligence is revolutionizing endoscopy Jean-Francois Rey Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(3): 302. CrossRef
Screening and Diagnostic Advances of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy Muhammed Yaman Swied, Mulham Alom, Obada Daaboul, Abdul Swied Innovations in Digital Health, Diagnostics, and Biomarkers.2024; 4(2024): 31. CrossRef
Endoscopic Artificial Intelligence for Image Analysis in Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Ryosuke Kikuchi, Kazuaki Okamoto, Tsuyoshi Ozawa, Junichi Shibata, Soichiro Ishihara, Tomohiro Tada Digestion.2024; 105(6): 419. CrossRef
Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for Classification of Gastric Neoplasms: Development and Validation Study Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee Biomimetics.2024; 9(12): 783. CrossRef
Endoskopische Therapie von Barrett-Neoplasien und Magenfrühkarzinomen Florian Berreth, Jan Peveling-Oberhag, Jörg G. Albert Die Gastroenterologie.2023; 18(3): 186. CrossRef
Andreas Probst, Alanna Ebigbo, Stefan Eser, Carola Fleischmann, Tina Schaller, Bruno Märkl, Stefan Schiele, Bernd Geissler, Gernot Müller, Helmut Messmann
Clin Endosc 2023;56(1):55-64. Published online January 13, 2023
Background /Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been established as a treatment modality for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Long-term follow-up data are lacking in Western countries. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survival in a Western center.
Methods Patients undergoing ESD for ESCC were included. The analysis was performed retrospectively using a prospectively collected database.
Results R0 resection rate was 96.7% (59/61 lesions in 58 patients). Twenty-seven patients (46.6%) fulfilled the curative resection criteria (M1/M2) (group A), 11 patients (19.0%) had M3 lesions without lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (group B), and 20 patients (34.5%) had lesions with submucosal invasion or LVI (group C). Additional treatment was recommended after non-curative resection. It was not performed in 20/31 patients (64.5%), mainly because of comorbidities (75%). Twenty-nine out of 58 (50.0%) patients died during a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Death was related to ESCC in 17.2% (5/29) of patients. The disease-specific survival rate after curative resection was 100%. Overall survival rates after 5 years were 61.5%, 63.6% and 28.1% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The overall survival was significantly worse after non-curative resection (p=0.038).
Conclusions Non-curative resection is frequent after ESD for ESCC in Western patients. The long-term prognosis is limited and mainly determined by comorbidity. Early diagnosis and pre-interventional assessments need to be improved.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in early esophageal neoplasia: Celebrating efficacy, confronting heterogeneity, and refining surveillance for high-risk patients Shi-Qiong Zhou, Qing-Hua Ke World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms: a multicenter North American experience Rishi Subrahmanyan, Hiroyuki Aihara, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, Shai Friedland, Joo Ha Hwang, Mohamed Othman, Salmaan Jawaid, Lorenzo Ferri, Christopher Teshima, Jeffrey Mosko, Robert Bechara, Jason Samarasena, Dennis Yang, Michael Ujiki, Yutak Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic resection of early esophageal neoplasia in patients with esophageal varices: a systematic review Charlotte N. Frederiks, Laura S. Boer, Bas Gloudemans, Lorenza Alvarez Herrero, Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman, Roos E. Pouw, Bas L.A.M. Weusten Endoscopy.2025; 57(07): 769. CrossRef
Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Current Concepts, Pitfalls and Future Perspectives João Santos-Antunes Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(7): 2488. CrossRef
Feasibility and predictors of same-day discharge following endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer Yu-ping Yuan, Chi-chao Wang, Yuan-liang Zheng BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Navigating the Treatment Landscape for Widespread Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasia Moon Won Lee, Gwang Ha Kim Gut and Liver.2025; 19(3): 305. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West: tips and tricks for successful resection Roberta Maselli Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 102(4): 488. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal malignancies: Current state and future perspectives Sandip Pal, Gourab Bhaduri World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results from a Western cohort Ilse N. Beaufort, Charlotte N. Frederiks, Anouk Overwater, Lodewijk A.A. Brosens, Arjun D. Koch, Roos E. Pouw, Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman, Bas L.A.M. Weusten Endoscopy.2024; 56(05): 325. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established method for the treatment of early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. Adequate submucosal exposure is one of the most significant factors related to an effective and safe dissection. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effcacy and safety of various methods that assist traction during ESD of precancerous and earlystage neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for relevant studies published up to May 2019. Trials exclusively recruiting patients undergoing ESD for superficial gastrointestinal cancer were considered eligible for inclusion. Thirty-three articles including 3,134 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated different approaches for widening the endoscopic view, including magnetic anchor-guided ESD (3 studies), use of a second endoscope (5 studies), clip-involving technique (21 studies), and miscellaneous methods (4 studies). Among them, only 6 were randomized controlled trials evaluating different approaches. Overall, the implementation of methods that assist traction during ESD significantly improved the operating time and R0 resection rate and decreased the rate of complications (bleeding and perforation). Interventions that assist traction seem effcacious in improving tissue traction, thus facilitating ESD performance.
Prospective, randomized controlled study evaluating a double-balloon interventional endoscopic platform for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video) Sergey V. Kantsevoy, Angela Palmer, Deborah Hockett, April Vilches Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 101(1): 149. CrossRef
Response Sergey V. Kantsevoy, Angela Palmer, Deborah Hockett, April Vilches Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 101(1): 230. CrossRef
Giant gastric leiomyoma excision using endoscopic submucosal dissection with dental floss clip traction technique: a case report Jiwen Deng, Zhaohui Liu, Dayong Sun Journal of International Medical Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Magnetic anchors with line-guided endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors Xueyan Zhang, Hongli Wang, Chen He, Zhenghan Xiao, Yanshun Zhang, Bo Qu European Journal of Medical Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection with Rubber Bands and Clips Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Abdelaziz A. Awad, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Malak A. Hassan, Mohamed Mahmoud Marey, Ahmed Bahnasy, Rashad G. Mohamed, Menna A. Keshk, Yousef Radwan Alnomani, Manar A. Balouz, Ahmed Abdelgayed M Hussein, Fatma S. Mohamed, Mohammed A. Alaeb, Mohamed S. Sharaf, O Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(8): 2823. CrossRef
The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal resection in periappendiceal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdellatif Ismail, Mohanad Awadalla, Shaikhoon Mohammed, Monzer Abdalla, Ayman Elawad, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Jenson Phung, Mohamed Abdallah, Neil Nero, Amit Bhatt, Madhusudhan Sanaka, Mohammad Bilal European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 37(12): 1350. CrossRef
Orthodontic rubber band combined with through-the-scope twin clip-assisted endoscopic intermuscular dissection for large laterally spreading tumors in the distal rectum Kunming Lv, Xiangdong Wang, Yifan Xu, Yaoqian Yuan, Enqiang Linghu, Qianqian Chen Endoscopy.2025; 57(S 01): E1010. CrossRef
The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Chengu Niu, Jing Zhang, Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula, Bryan E-Xin, Mahesh Napel, Patrick I. Okolo Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(1): 129. CrossRef
Facilitating endoscopic full‐thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors with a novel snare traction method (with video) Lei Gu, Xiaotong Wang, Miao Ouyang, Fujun Li, Yu Wu, Xiaowei Liu Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(3): 535. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm Ulrike Walburga Denzer Visceral Medicine.2024; 40(3): 116. CrossRef
Efficacy, safety, and impact on procedural outcomes of local anesthesia in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdelmalek Abdelghany, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Doha Mohamed, Ammar Ayman Bahbah, Islam Mohamed, Khaled Elfert, Ahmed E. Salem, Azizullah Beran, Ahmad Madkour, Mohammad Al-Haddad Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2024; 37(6): 963. CrossRef
Building the Toolbox of Devices to Optimize a Practice in Submucosal Endoscopy Rahil H. Shah, Sunil Amin Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2023; 33(1): 15. CrossRef
Error-Correcting Mean-Teacher: Corrections instead of consistency-targets applied to semi-supervised medical image segmentation Robert Mendel, David Rauber, Luis A. de Souza, João P. Papa, Christoph Palm Computers in Biology and Medicine.2023; 154: 106585. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review Diogo Libânio, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes, Barbara Bastiaansen, Raf Bisschops, Michael J. Bourke, Pierre H. Deprez, Gianluca Esposito, Arnaud Lemmers, Philippe Leclercq, Roberta Maselli, Helmut Messmann, Oliver Pech, Mathieu Pioche, Michael Vieth, Bas L.A.M. We Endoscopy.2023; 55(04): 361. CrossRef
Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience Hiroaki Matsui, Naoto Tamai, Toshiki Futakuchi, Shunsuke Kamba, Akira Dobashi, Kazuki Sumiyama BMC Gastroenterology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Novel Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Double-Endoscope and Snare-Based Traction Chu-Kuang Chou, Kun-Feng Tsai, Cheng-Hao Tseng, Ching-Tai Lee, Kuo-Hsin Yang, Min-Chi Chang, Chao-Wen Hsu Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(7): 936. CrossRef
Novel articulating through-the-scope traction device Cem Simsek, Christopher C. Thompson, Khaled J. Alkhateeb, Sebastian A. Jofre, Hiroyuki Aihara VideoGIE.2022; 7(10): 353. CrossRef
“String-to-ring” traction technique for endoscopic submocosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors A. A. Mitrakov, S. S. Pirogov, N. N. Mitrakova, S. V. Gamayunov, M. V. Timoshchenko, R. A. Gagaev Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; (5): 97. CrossRef
Combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, a practical solution for difficult cases Dong-Hoon Yang Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 626. CrossRef
A novel training model to simulate thread traction in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection – a video vignette Shih‐Feng Huang, Chao‐Wen Hsu Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(4): 1012. CrossRef
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric dysplasia and early cancer: Current evidence and what the future may hold Edward Young, Hamish Philpott, Rajvinder Singh World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(31): 5126. CrossRef
Double-endoscope assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating tumors in rectum and distal colon by expert endoscopists: a feasibility study A. Ebigbo, G. Tziatzios, S. K. Gölder, A. Probst, H. Messmann Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(12): 1293. CrossRef