Clinical Endoscopy

Editorial

Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer: Jae Myung Park; Clin Endosc 2023;56(4):453-454. Published online July 10, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.133

PDF PubReader ePub

1,586 View
77 Download

Original Article

Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection: Ga-Yeong Shin, Hyun Ho Choi, Jae Myung Park, Sang Yoon Kim, Jun Young Park, Donghoon Kang, Yu Kyung Cho, Sung Soo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi; Clin Endosc 2023;56(3):325-332. Published online March 21, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen.
Results
Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers.
Conclusions
Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Adenoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Jae Myung Park, Songhee Cho, Ga-Yeong Shin, Jayoun Lee, Minjee Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim
American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2166. CrossRef

3,169 View
129 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Review

Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park; Clin Endosc 2022;55(3):319-331. Published online May 16, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.094

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been used to diagnose a wide variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. In particular, EGD is used to screen high-risk subjects of gastric cancer. Quality control of EGD is important because the diagnostic rate is examiner-dependent. However, there is still no representative quality indicator that can be uniformly applied in EGD. There has been growing awareness of the importance of quality control in improving EGD performance. Therefore, we aimed to review the available and emerging quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric High-Grade Foveolar Dysplasia With Normal Background Mucosa
Gonzalo Latorre, Alberto Espino, Christine E. Orr, Robert Bechara
Gastro Hep Advances.2025; 4(2): 100565. CrossRef
GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach
Diego Bravo, Juan Frias, Felipe Vera, Juan Trejos, Carlos Martínez, Martín Gómez, Fabio González, Eduardo Romero
Scientific Data.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Helicobacter pylori-related serum indicators: Cutting-edge advances to enhance the efficacy of gastric cancer screening
Hao-Tian Sun
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial
Qing Wang, Yue Sui, Jingwen Gong, Xing Chen
BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
Lihui Zhang, Liwen Yao, Zihua Lu, Honggang Yu
Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 5. CrossRef
Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine in improving mucosal visibility: Towards a “clearer view” during endoscopy
Akash Roy, Mahesh K. Goenka
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 43(5): 863. CrossRef
Relationship between observation time and detection rate of focal lesions in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a single-center, retrospective study
Li Dong, Xiaodan Zhang, Yuting Xuan, Peiling Xiong, Yumei Ning, Bing Zhang, Fan Wang, Qiu Zhao, Jun Fang
BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure
Maddalena De Bernardo, Antonella Santonicola, Marco Gioia, Livio Vitiello, Ferdinando Cione, Sergio Pagliarulo, Paola Iovino, Nicola Rosa
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1224. CrossRef
The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jae Gon Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Abdullah Ozgur Yeniova, Sang Pyo Lee
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(3): 444. CrossRef
Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study
Kazuhiro Ksahiwagi, Toshifumi Yoshida, Kayoko Fukuhara, Rieko Bessho, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Nagamu Inoue, Hiromasa Takaishi, Yasushi Iwao, Takanori Kanai
Medicine.2024; 103(26): e38774. CrossRef
Sistema de auditoría automática para la exploración endoscópica del estómago con Inteligencia Artificial – Gastro UNAL: Gastroendoscopy UNit for Automatic Labeling
Martín Alonso Gómez Zuleta, Diego Fernando Bravo Higuera, Josué Andre Ruano Balseca, María Jaramillo González, Fabio Augusto González Osorio, Edgar Eduardo Romero Castro
Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2024; 39(2): 133. CrossRef
Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
Gut and Liver.2024; 18(5): 781. CrossRef
Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective
Arnoldo Riquelme, Felipe Silva, Diego Reyes, Gonzalo Latorre
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2024; 24(3): 218. CrossRef
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Quality Improvement and the Role of Topical Antiperistaltic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic Imaging for the Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Pre-Neoplastic Conditions of the Stomach
Bruno Costa Martins, Renata Nobre Moura, Angelo So Taa Kum, Carolina Ogawa Matsubayashi, Sergio Barbosa Marques, Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro
Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2445. CrossRef
The effect of short-term training about depth predicting score on the diagnostic ability of invasion depth for differentiated early gastric Cancer among non-expert endoscopists
Hui Li, Hui Hu, Ping Geng, Panhui Guo, Yuanrong Zhu, Lulu Zeng, Jun Liu, Xiangpeng Hu
BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Variation in the rate of detection of minute and small early gastric cancers at diagnostic endoscopy may reflect the performance of individual endoscopists
Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato, Yuji Amano, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai
BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2023; 10(1): e001143. CrossRef
Improving the quality of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Helicobacter pylori-naïve gastric cancer
Jae Myung Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 453. CrossRef
Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1. CrossRef
Antispasmodic Agent Administration Improves Gastric Neoplasm Detection Rates during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(3): 246. CrossRef
Clinical features of gastric adenoma detected within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy in Korea
Hyun Young Kim
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef

13,605 View
707 Download
17 Web of Science
21 Crossref

Commentary

Quality Indicator for Gastric Cancer Detection Based on Helicobacter pylori Status: Jae Myung Park; Clin Endosc 2020;53(6):629-630. Published online November 30, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.270

PDF PubReader ePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cancer Patient Perception Survey to Develop Korean Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer
Dong Hyeon Kim, Jong Hee Kim, Ji Hye Park, Hwa Seung Yoo, Hyeong Joon Jeon, So Jung Park
Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine.2023; 37(4): 81. CrossRef
Endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer
Dong Chan Joo, Gwang Ha Kim
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(5): 267. CrossRef
[Retracted] Construction of Stomach Cancer Lesion Detection Combined with Drug Therapy Based on Artificial Intelligence
Shengyong Zhai, Lihong Yu, Jing Li, Sandip K. Mishra
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Tailored eradication strategy vs concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in Korean patients
Youn I Choi, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Ja Young Seo, Dong Kyun Park
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(31): 5247. CrossRef

4,023 View
104 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Original Articles

Factors Affecting Endoscopic Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer in the Population-Based Screening Era: Yoon Gwon Mun, Myung-Gyu Choi, Chul-Hyun Lim, Han Hee Lee, Dong Hoon Kang, Jae Myung Park, Kyo Young Song; Clin Endosc 2018;51(5):478-484. Published online June 1, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.006

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Since population-based screening for gastric cancer in Korea was implemented, endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer has become increasingly popular. This study investigates factors affecting endoscopic curative resection of early gastric cancer in population-based screening for gastric cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer who underwent treatment at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. All patients completed questionnaires about clinical information, including interval between surveillance tests for gastric cancer.
Results
Of 469 gastric cancer patients, 147 (31.3%) had undergone curative endoscopic resection, 260 (55.4%) had undergone curative surgical resection, and 62 (13.3%) underwent non-curative resection or were in an inoperable state. Patients with curative endoscopic resection had fewer alarm symptoms/signs than other groups. In multivariate analysis, regular surveillance endoscopy was the only factor predicting curative endoscopic resection (odds ratio [OR], 6.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.532–14.933). In addition, patients undergoing gastric cancer screening had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic curative resection compared with subjects who had never been screened. (1-year interval: OR, 49.969; 95% CI, 6.340–393.827, 2-year interval: OR, 15.283; 95% CI, 1.833–127.406, over 2-year interval: OR, 10.651; 95% CI, 1.248–90.871). Shorter screening test intervals were associated with higher rates of endoscopic curative resection.
Conclusions
Regular surveillance testing was the independent factor predicting curative endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A model established using marital status and other factors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for early stage gastric cancer
Lixiang Zhang, Baichuan Zhou, Panquan Luo, Aman Xu, Wenxiu Han, Zhijian Wei
Journal of Investigative Medicine.2022; 70(6): 1373. CrossRef
Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Non-Curative Resection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in Korea
Si Hyung Lee, Min Cheol Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Kang Nyeong Lee, Jong Jae Park, Su Jin Hong
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(2): 196. CrossRef
The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?
Seong Woo Jeon
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(5): 402. CrossRef

6,135 View
113 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Therapeutic Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer with Undifferentiated-Type Histology: A Korean ESD Registry Database Analysis: Chang Seok Bang, Jae Myung Park, Gwang Ho Baik, Jong Jae Park, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Young Jang, Seong Woo Jeon, Suck Chei Choi, Jae Kyu Sung, Kwang Bum Cho; Clin Endosc 2017;50(6):569-577. Published online July 25, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.017

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: To assess the therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) of early gastric cancer (EGC) with undifferentiated-type histology.
Methods
Cases of ER of EGC with undifferentiated-type histology in the Korean endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) registry database were identified and reviewed. The immediate outcomes, including en bloc resection, complete resection, and curative resection rates, and long-term outcomes, including recurrence and survival rates, were extracted and analyzed.
Results
From 2006 to 2015, 275 EGCs with undifferentiated-type histology from 275 patients were identified. The immediate outcomes were as follows: en bloc resection rate: 92.4%; complete resection rate: 80%; and curative resection rate: 36.4%. Compared to patients with lesions that were beyond the expanded indication, those with expanded indication lesions showed better therapeutic outcomes. There was no difference in immediate outcomes between patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC). However, compared to ER of SRC, ER of PDC had a stronger association with submucosal invasion (41.9% vs. 23.6%, p=0.003). With regard to long-term outcomes, there was no difference between lesions with curative and non-curative resections in the recurrence and mortality rates. These rates also did not differ between PDC and SRC (median follow up: 3.96 years).
Conclusions
ER confined to expanded indication lesions can be considered for treatment of EGC with undifferentiated-type histology.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Rare Case of Primary Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: a Review of Guidelines for the Management of Gastric Cancer
Ronald Mauricio Blanco Montecino, Mikhail Sukhorosl, Mayi Ann Francis, Neeraj Kancherla, Ogbonnaya Akuma, Nkiruka Lauretta Nwangene, Shreyas Nandyal, Rohan Raj, Chinaza Mercy Akuma, Tamer Zahdeh, Sharanya Kaushik, Adil M. Khan
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(1): 153. CrossRef
Update on Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
鹏齐陈
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(03): 922. CrossRef
Advances in Endoscopic Detection and Therapeutic Strategies for Early Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma
Jiahui Xu, Fan Yin, Mengyu Cao, Linlin Ren, Shidong Wang, Congcong Min, Xiaoyu Li, Zibin Tian, Tao Mao
Nature Cell and Science.2024; 2(1): 10. CrossRef
An artificial intelligence system for comprehensive pathologic outcome prediction in early gastric cancer through endoscopic image analysis (with video)
Seunghan Lee, Jiwoon Jeon, Jinbae Park, Young Hoon Chang, Cheol Min Shin, Mi Jin Oh, Su Hyun Kim, Seungkyung Kang, Su Hee Park, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Han-Kwang Yang, Hey Seung Lee, Soo-Jeong Cho
Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(5): 1088. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer
Yuichiro Hirai, Seiichiro Abe, Mai Ego Makiguchi, Masau Sekiguchi, Satoru Nonaka, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Yutaka Saito
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(1): 146. CrossRef
Update on diagnosis and treatment of early signet-ring cell gastric carcinoma: A literature review
Yun-He Tang, Lin-Lin Ren, Tao Mao
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 15(4): 240. CrossRef
Clinical Features of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Cancer: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mariagiulia Dal Cero, Maria Bencivenga, Drolaiz H. W. Liu, Michele Sacco, Mariella Alloggio, Kelly G. P. Kerckhoffs, Federica Filippini, Luca Saragoni, Mar Iglesias, Anna Tomezzoli, Fátima Carneiro, Heike I. Grabsch, Giuseppe Verlato, Lorena Torroni, Guil
Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5191. CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a nationwide multi-center study
Jie-Hyun Kim, Young-Il Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Woon Geon Shin, Hyo-Joon Yang, Su Youn Nam, Byung-Hoon Min, Jae-Young Jang, Joo Hyun Lim, Wan Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung H
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(3): 1847. CrossRef
Diffuse-type Gastric Cancer
Jie-Hyun Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2022; 22(1): 11. CrossRef
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early signet ring cell gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Chun-Yan Weng, Shao-Peng Sun, Chang Cai, Jing-Li Xu, Bin Lv
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(20): 6915. CrossRef
Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia
Kidane Siele Embaye, Chao Zhang, Matiwos Araya Ghebrehiwet, Zhihao Wang, Fengdi Zhang, Liwei Liu, Shenghui Qin, Lingzhi Qin, Jun Wang, Xi Wang
BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors associated with overall survival in early gastric cancer patients who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection
Zhi Zheng, Fan-Di Bu, Hao Chen, Jie Yin, Rui Xu, Jun Cai, Jun Zhang, Hong-Wei Yao, Zhong-Tao Zhang
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(10): 2192. CrossRef
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer
Chang Seok Bang
Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(2): 143. CrossRef
Establishing Machine Learning Models to Predict Curative Resection in Early Gastric Cancer with Undifferentiated Histology: Development and Usability Study
Chang Seok Bang, Ji Yong Ahn, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young-Il Kim, Il Ju Choi, Woon Geon Shin
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(4): e25053. CrossRef
Результаты проксимальной резекции желудка в зависимости от методов реконструкции желудочно-кишечного тракта
Виктория Эдуардовна Тишакова , Дмитрий Валерьевич Ручкин , Александр Анатольевич Грицкевич , Николай Алексеевич Ефименко
Естественные и Технические Науки.2021; (№11): 198. CrossRef
Protocol for expanded indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in China: a multicenter, ambispective, observational, open-cohort study
Zhi Zheng, Jie Yin, Ziyu Li, Yingjiang Ye, Bo Wei, Xin Wang, Yantao Tian, Mengyi Li, Qian Zhang, Na Zeng, Rui Xu, Guangyong Chen, Jie Zhang, Peng Li, Jun Cai, Hongwei Yao, Jun Zhang, Zhongtao Zhang, Shutian Zhang
BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Regional Lymph Node Dissection as an Additional Treatment Option to Endoscopic Resection for Expanded Indications in Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Cohort Study
Ho Seok Seo, Han Mo Yoo, Yoon Ju Jung, Sung Hak Lee, Jae Myung Park, Kyo Young Song, Eun Sun Jung, Myung-Gyu Choi, Cho Hyun Park
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2020; 20(4): 442. CrossRef
Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study
Chang Seok Bang, Woon Geon Shin, Seung In Seo, Min Ho Choi, Hyun Joo Jang, Se Woo Park, Sea Hyub Kae, Young Joo Yang, Suk Pyo Shin, Gwang Ho Baik, Hak Yang Kim
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(5): 1376. CrossRef
Effect of age on the clinical outcomes of patients with early gastric cancer with undifferentiated-type histology
Jeung Hui Pyo, Hyuk Lee, Yang Won Min, Byung-Hoon Min, Jun Haeng Lee, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Heejin Yoo, Kyunga Kim, Yoon-Ho Choi, Jae J. Kim, Sung Kim
Surgery.2019; 165(4): 802. CrossRef
Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic vs. surgical resection for early gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology
Joo Hyun Lim, Jung Kim, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyunsoo Chung
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(11): 3589. CrossRef
Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Publications about Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer with Undifferentiated-Type Histology
Chang Seok Bang, Gwang Ho Baik
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 30. CrossRef
Strategy for Curative Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer
Jie-Hyun Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 9. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated-Type Gastric Carcinoma
Myeong-Cherl Kook
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 15. CrossRef
Is Radical Surgery Necessary for All Patients Diagnosed as Having Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection?
Si Hyung Lee, Byung Sam Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 21. CrossRef
Characteristics of proximal early gastric cancer differentiating distal early gastric cancer
Jin Sung Koh, Moon Kyung Joo, Jong-Jae Park, Beom Jae Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Sang Woo Lee, You-Jin Jang, Young-Jae Mok, Masaru Katoh
PLOS ONE.2019; 14(9): e0223284. CrossRef
Usefulness of histologic differences and perivascular infiltration for preoperative T staging of advanced gastric cancer using computed tomography
Ji Youn Kim, Woo-Suk Chung, Hyeun Jin Lee, Ji Hae An, Jang Shin Son
Japanese Journal of Radiology.2019; 37(12): 817. CrossRef
Mixed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer predicts endoscopic noncurative resection
Yusuke Horiuchi, Junko Fujisaki, Noriko Yamamoto, Naoki Ishizuka, Masami Omae, Akiyoshi Ishiyama, Toshiyuki Yoshio, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Yorimasa Yamamoto, Masatsugu Nagahama, Hiroshi Takahashi, Tomohiro Tsuchida
Gastric Cancer.2018; 21(4): 689. CrossRef
Self-expandable metal stents in patients with postoperative delayed gastric emptying after distal gastrectomy
Seung Han Kim, Bora Keum, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim, Sungsoo Park
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(40): 4578. CrossRef
Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer with Undifferentiated-Type Histology
Jie-Hyun Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(6): 511. CrossRef

7,926 View
342 Download
28 Web of Science
29 Crossref

Focused Review Series: Roles of Bariatric Endoscopy in Obesity Treatment

Role of Malabsorptive Endoscopic Procedures in Obesity Treatment: Jae Myung Park; Clin Endosc 2017;50(1):26-30. Published online January 30, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.004

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

The incidence of obesity is increasing, and more definitive treatment modalities are needed. Endoluminal procedures, including restrictive endoscopic procedures, endoscopic gastroplasty, and malabsorptive endoscopic procedures, can reduce weight in obese patients and control obesity-related comorbidities. Malabsorptive endoscopic interventions also offer the potential for an ambulatory procedure that may be safer and more cost-effective compared with laparoscopic surgery. Malabsorptive endoscopic intervention can induce weight reduction and improve obesity-related metabolic parameters, despite complications such as device migration, obstruction, and abdominal pain. Improvement in technique will follow the development of new devices.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review
Maheeba Abdulla, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(40): 5526. CrossRef
Implants with Sensing Capabilities
Mladen Veletić, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Mitar Simić, Jacob Bergsland, Ilangko Balasingham, Christopher H. Contag, Nureddin Ashammakhi
Chemical Reviews.2022; 122(21): 16329. CrossRef
Psychological Outcomes and Predictors of Weight Loss in Adolescents With Severe Obesity Following a Reversible Endoscopic Bariatric Procedure
Simona Klemenčič, Ana Bujišić, Neža Štiglic Hribernik, Tadej Battelino, Matjaž Homan, Rok Orel, Primož Kotnik
Frontiers in Pediatrics.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Novelties in the treatment of obesity
Pavol Holéczy
Medicína pro praxi.2019; 16(4): 259. CrossRef

8,427 View
135 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Original Articles

Endoscopic Electrosurgery in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Myong Ki Baeg, Sang-Woo Kim, Sun-Hye Ko, Yoon Bum Lee, Seawon Hwang, Bong-Woo Lee, Hye Jin Choi, Jae Myung Park, In-Seok Lee, Yong-Seog Oh, Myung-Gyu Choi; Clin Endosc 2016;49(2):176-181. Published online February 11, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.023

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background
/Aims: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) undergoing endoscopic electrosurgery (EE) are at a risk of electromagnetic interference (EMI). We aimed to analyze the effects of EE in CIED patients.
Methods
Patients with CIED who underwent EE procedures such as snare polypectomy, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) were retrospectively analyzed. Postprocedural symptoms as well as demographic and outpatient follow-up data were reviewed through medical records. Electrical data, including preprocedural and postprocedural arrhythmia records, were reviewed through pacemaker interrogation, 24-hour Holter monitoring, or electrocardiogram.
Results
Fifty-nine procedures in 49 patients were analyzed. Fifty procedures were performed in 43 patients with a pacemaker, and nine were performed in six patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. There were one gastric and 44 colon snare polypectomies, five gastric and one colon ESDs, and eight ERCPs with EST. Fifty-five cases of electrical follow-up were noted, with two postprocedural changes not caused by EE. Thirty-one pacemaker interrogations had procedure recordings, with two cases of asymptomatic tachycardia. All patients were asymptomatic with no adverse events.
Conclusions
Our study reports no adverse events from EE in patients with CIED, suggesting that this procedure is safe. However, because of the possibility of EMI, recommendations on EE should be followed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Electrosurgical unit in GI endoscopy: the proper settings for practice
Anuraag Jena, Shubham Jain, Sridhar Sundaram, Anupam Kumar Singh, Sanjay Chandnani, Pravin Rathi
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 17(8): 825. CrossRef
2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery
Sigrun Halvorsen, Julinda Mehilli, Salvatore Cassese, Trygve S Hall, Magdy Abdelhamid, Emanuele Barbato, Stefan De Hert, Ingrid de Laval, Tobias Geisler, Lynne Hinterbuchner, Borja Ibanez, Radosław Lenarczyk, Ulrich R Mansmann, Paul McGreavy, Christian Mu
European Heart Journal.2022; 43(39): 3826. CrossRef
EHRA consensus on prevention and management of interference due to medical procedures in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Markus Stühlinger, Haran Burri, Kevin Vernooy, Rodrigue Garcia, Radoslaw Lenarczyk, Arian Sultan, Michael Brunner, Avi Sabbag, Emin Evren Özcan, Jorge Toquero Ramos, Giuseppe Di Stolfo, Mahmoud Suleiman, Florian Tinhofer, Julian Miguel Aristizabal, Ivan C
Europace.2022; 24(9): 1512. CrossRef
Electromagnetic interference on cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators during endoscopy as reported to the US Federal Drug Administration
Jason M. Samuels, Douglas M. Overbey, Krzysztof J. Wikiel, Teresa S. Jones, Thomas N. Robinson, Edward L. Jones
Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(7): 3796. CrossRef
SAFETY IN THE GASTROENTEROLOGY SETTING

Gastroenterology Nursing.2021; 44(6): 467. CrossRef
Practice Advisory for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillators 2020

Anesthesiology.2020; 132(2): 225. CrossRef
Safety and outcomes of noncardiac surgery in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
Bahman Akhondi, Mohammadmostafa Ansari-Ramandi, Mona Heidarali, Farzad Kamali, Majid Haghjoo
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine.2019; 8(3): 76. CrossRef
Critical analysis of guidelines for providing sedation to patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
Basavana Goudra, PreetMohinder Singh
Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.2019; 13(4): 601. CrossRef
Is It Safe to Perform Therapeutic Endoscopic Procedures in Patients with Implanted Electronic Cardiac Devices?
Eun Young Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(2): 104. CrossRef

12,259 View
156 Download
9 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Performance and Clinical Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Intramural Lesions: Hea Jung Sung, Yu Kyung Cho, Eun Young Park, Sung Jin Moon, Chul Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Kyu Yong Choi; Clin Endosc 2013;46(6):627-632. Published online November 19, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.627

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions.

Methods

Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging.

Results

Forty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 males) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Feasibility and clinical value of linear endoscopic ultrasonography imaging in the lower gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
Li Tao, Yajun Chen, Qianqian Fang, Fan Xu, Qianwei Yu, Lijiu Zhang, Xiangpeng Hu
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumors: Impact of rapid onsite evaluation and correlation with histopathologic follow‐up
Syed M. Gilani, Thiruvengadam Muniraj, Harry R. Aslanian, Guoping Cai
Diagnostic Cytopathology.2021; 49(2): 203. CrossRef
Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: Focusing on Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(1): 9. CrossRef
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy without Rapid On-Site Cytologic Examination: A Time to Change the Paradigm?
Yeon Suk Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(3): 207. CrossRef

6,511 View
59 Download
4 Crossref

Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps: Chul-Hyun Lim, Myung-Gyu Choi, Won Chul Kim, Jin Soo Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Jae Myung Park, In Seok Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Kyu Yong Choi, In-Sik Chung; Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):62-66. Published online March 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62

Abstract PDF PubReader ePub

Background/Aims

It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy.

Methods

Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue.

Results

Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps.

Conclusions

Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption
Alessandro Repici, Kareem Khalaf, Edoardo Troncone, Sharmila Subramaniam, Cesare Hassan, Pradeep Bhandari, Lars AABAKKEN, Sarah ABERE, Maisam W. AKROUSH, Abed AL-LEHIBI, Eduardo ALBÉNIZ, Asma ALKANDARI, Majid A. ALMADI, Andrea ANDERLONI, Amol BAPAYE, Napo
Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(2): 322. CrossRef
Single‐use accessories and endoscopes in the era of sustainability and climate change—A balancing act
Zaheer Nabi, Raymond S. Y. Tang, Sridhar Sundaram, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(1): 7. CrossRef
Ressourcenschonung aus Sicht der Hygiene
Susanne Kolbe-Busch, Iris F. Chaberny
Die Chirurgie.2023; 94(3): 220. CrossRef
An Economic Analysis of Direct Costs of Distal Radius Fixation and the Implications of a Disposable Distal Radius Kit
Jonathan Lans, Ritsaart F. Westenberg, Svenna H.W.L. Verhiel, Rohit Garg, Jesse B. Jupiter, Neal C. Chen
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2021; 35(9): e346. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories
Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(3): 276. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guidelines for Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories; Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean College of Helicobact
Dae Young Cheung, Byung Ik Jang, Sang Wook Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Hyung Keun Kim, Jeong Eun Shin, Won Jae Yoon, Yong Kang Lee, Kwang Hyun Chung, Soo-Jeong Cho, Hyun Phil Shin, Sun Young Cho, Woon Geon Shin, Kee Don Choi, Byung-Wook Kim, Joong Goo Kwon, Hee Ch
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2020; 95(5): 325. CrossRef
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
Byoung Kwan Son, Byung-Wook Kim, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(2): 143. CrossRef
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing
Byung-Wook Kim, Byoung Kwan Son, Won Hee Kim, Dae-Sung Myung, Young-Seok Cho, Byung Ik Jang
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2017; 92(3): 239. CrossRef
Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps
J.A. Cartwright, T.L. Hill, S. Smith, D. Shaw
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2016; 30(4): 1002. CrossRef
Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea
Young-Seok Cho
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(1): 1. CrossRef
Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection
Ji Kon Ryu, Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ki Baik Hahm
Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(5): 351. CrossRef
High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing
King-Wah Chiu
World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2015; 5(1): 33. CrossRef
Is non-woven fabric a useful method of packaging instruments for operation theatres in resource constrained settings?
GS Devadiga, VMP Thomas, S Shetty, MS Setia
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology.2015; 33(2): 243. CrossRef
Steps of Reprocessing and Equipments
Yong Kook Lee, Jeong Bae Park
Clinical Endoscopy.2013; 46(3): 274. CrossRef

8,279 View
108 Download
14 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search