Background /Aims: Endoscopic biliary drainage using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant biliary strictures occasionally induces acute cholecystitis (AC). This study evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic gallbladder stents (GBS) during SEMS placement.
Methods Among 158 patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures between January 2018 and March 2023, 30 patients who attempted to undergo prophylactic GBS placement before SEMS placement were included.
Results Technical success was achieved in 21 cases (70.0%). The mean diameter of the cystic duct was more significant in the successful cases (6.5 mm vs. 3.7 mm, p<0.05). Adverse events occurred for 7 patients (23.3%: acute pancreatitis in 7; non-obstructive cholangitis in 1; perforation of the cystic duct in 1 with an overlap), all of which improved with conservative treatment. No patients developed AC when the GBS placement was successful, whereas 25 of the 128 patients (19.5%) without a prophylactic GBS developed AC during the median follow-up period of 357 days (p=0.043). In the multivariable analysis, GBS placement was a significant factor in preventing AC (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–0.99; p=0.045).
Conclusions GBS may contribute to the prevention of AC after SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Technical challenges and safety of prophylactic gallbladder stenting with metallic biliary stenting Masood Muhammad Karim, Om Parkash Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(6): 841. CrossRef
Background /Aims: We aimed to investigate (1) promising clinical findings for the recognition of focal type autoimmune pancreatitis (FAIP) and (2) the impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) on the diagnosis of FAIP.
Methods Twenty-three patients with FAIP were involved in this study, and 44 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were included in the control group.
Results (1) Multivariate analysis revealed that homogeneous delayed enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography was a significant factor indicative of FAIP compared to PDAC (90% vs. 7%, p=0.015). (2) For 13 of 17 FAIP patients (76.5%) who underwent EUS-TA, EUS-TA aided the diagnostic confirmation of AIPs, and only one patient (5.9%) was found to have AIP after surgery. On the other hand, of the six patients who did not undergo EUS-TA, three (50.0%) underwent surgery for pancreatic lesions.
Conclusions Homogeneous delayed enhancement on contrast-enhanced computed tomography was the most useful clinical factor for discriminating FAIPs from PDACs. EUS-TA is mandatory for diagnostic confirmation of FAIP lesions and can contribute to a reduction in the rate of unnecessary surgery for patients with FAIP.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A multidisciplinary approach is essential for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma Sung-Hoon Moon Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(4): 457. CrossRef
Background /Aims: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of pancreatic duct lavage cytology combined with a cell-block method (PLC-CB) for possible pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs).
Methods This study included 41 patients with suspected PDACs who underwent PLC-CB mainly because they were unfit for undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration. A 6-Fr double lumen catheter was mainly used to perform PLC-CB. Final diagnoses were obtained from the findings of resected specimens or clinical outcomes during surveillance after PLC-CB.
Results Histocytological evaluations using PLC-CB were performed in 87.8% (36/41) of the patients. For 31 of the 36 patients, final diagnoses (invasive PDAC, 12; pancreatic carcinoma in situ, 5; benignancy, 14) were made, and the remaining five patients were excluded due to lack of surveillance periods after PLC-CB. For 31 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PLC-CB for detecting malignancy were 94.1%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively. In addition, they were 87.5%, 100%, and 94.1%, respectively, in 17 patients without pancreatic masses detectable using endoscopic ultrasonography. Four patients developed postprocedural pancreatitis, which improved with conservative therapy.
Conclusions PLC-CB has an excellent ability to detect malignancies in patients with possible PDACs, including pancreatic carcinoma in situ.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer via pancreatic juice cytology with a cell-block method in a patient with altered anatomy Yasuo Otsuka, Kosuke Minaga, Akane Hara, Kentaro Yamao, Mamoru Takenaka, Takaaki Chikugo, Masatoshi Kudo Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(06): E764. CrossRef
Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer Yasutaka ISHII, Masahiro SERIKAWA, Shinya NAKAMURA, Juri IKEMOTO, Shiro OKA Suizo.2024; 39(4): 247. CrossRef
Cell block created from pancreatic duct lavage is another jigsaw puzzle to diagnose early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Rungsun Rerknimitr Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(3): 313. CrossRef
Background /Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of sedation with propofol as an alternative to benzodiazepine drugs in outpatient endoscopy.
Methods In this prospective study, examinees who underwent outpatient endoscopy under propofol sedation and submitted a nextday questionnaire with providing informed consent were evaluated. Periprocedural acute responses, late adverse events within 24 hours, and examinee satisfaction were evaluated.
Results Among the 4,122 patients who received propofol in the 17,978 outpatient-based endoscopic examinations performed between November 2016 and March 2018, 2,305 eligible examinees (esophagogastroduodenoscopy for 1,340, endoscopic ultrasonography for 945, and total colonoscopy for 20) were enrolled, and their responses to a questionnaire were analyzed. The mean propofol dose was 69.6±24.4 mg (range, 20–200 mg). Diazepam, midazolam, and/or pentazocine in combination with propofol was administered to 146 examinees. Mild oxygen desaturation was observed in 59 examinees (2.6%); and mild bradycardia, in 2 (0.09%). Other severe reactions or late events did not occur. After eliminating 181 invalid responses, 97.7% (2,065/2,124) of the patients desired propofol sedation in future examinations.
Conclusions Propofol sedation was found to be safe—without severe adverse events or accidents—for outpatient endoscopy on the basis of the patients’ next-day self-evaluation. Given the high satisfaction level, propofol sedation might be an ideal tool for painless endoscopic screening.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia Matthew Brohan, Janette Brohan, Basavana Goudra Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4362. CrossRef
How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopy Tom G. Moreels Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(1): 89. CrossRef
Propofol Alone versus Propofol in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients with Paradoxical Reactions to Midazolam Ji Hyung Nam, Dong Kee Jang, Jun Kyu Lee, Hyoun Woo Kang, Byung-Wook Kim, Byung Ik Jang Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(2): 234. CrossRef
Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy Jun Kyu Lee Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735. CrossRef
Background /Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of inside plastic stents (iPSs) versus those of metal stents (MSs) for treating unresectable perihilar malignant obstructions.
Methods For all patients who underwent endoscopic suprapapillary placement of iPS(s) or MS(s) as the first permanent biliary drainage for unresectable malignant perihilar obstructions between January 2014 and August 2019, clinical outcomes using iPSs (n=20) and MSs (n=85), including clinical efficacy, adverse events, and time to recurrence of biliary obstruction (RBO), were retrospectively evaluated.
Results There were no differences in clinical effectiveness (95% for the iPS group vs. 92% for the MS group, p=1.00). Procedure-related adverse events, including pancreatitis, acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, and death, were observed for 8% of the MS group, although no patient in the iPS group developed such adverse events. The median time to RBO was 561 days (95% confidence interval, 0–1,186 days) for iPSs and 209 days (127–291 days) for MSs, showing a significant difference (p=0.008).
Conclusions Time to RBO after iPS placement was significantly longer than that after MS placement. IPSs, which are removable, unlike MSs, were an acceptable option.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Unilateral drainage and chemotherapy prolong the patency of a plastic stent placed above the sphincter of Oddi in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction Fumimasa Tomooka, Koh Kitagawa, Akira Mitoro, Yukihisa Fujinaga, Norihisa Nishimura, Tadashi Namisaki, Takemi Akahane, Kosuke Kaji, Shohei Asada, Shinya Sato, Jun‐Ichi Hanatani, Hitoshi Mori, Yuki Motokawa, Tomihiro Iwata, Hiroki Kachi, Yui Osaki, Hitoshi DEN Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of unilateral and bilateral intraductal plastic stent placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction: A propensity score‐matched cohort analysis Mitsuru Okuno, Keisuke Iwata, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Yuhei Iwasa, Shinya Uemura, Kensaku Yoshida, Akinori Maruta, Takuji Iwashita, Ichiro Yasuda, Masahito Shimizu Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2024; 31(4): 284. CrossRef
A Novel Method of Calculating the Drained Liver Volume Using a 3D Volume Analyzer for Biliary Drainage of Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction Naoto Imagawa, Mitsuharu Fukasawa, Shinichi Takano, Satoshi Kawakami, Yoshimitsu Fukasawa, Hiroyuki Hasegawa, Natsuhiko Kuratomi, Shota Harai, Naruki Shimamura, Dai Yoshimura, Shoji Kobayashi, Takashi Yoshida, Mitsuaki Sato, Yuichiro Suzuki, Nobuyuki Enom Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024; 69(3): 969. CrossRef
Partial Stent-in-Stent Method with an Uncovered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Bile Duct Obstruction Takuya Shimosaka, Yohei Takeda, Taro Yamashita, Yuta Seki, Shiho Kawahara, Takayuki Hirai, Noriyuki Suto, Yuri Sakamoto, Wataru Hamamoto, Hiroki Koda, Takumi Onoyama, Kazuya Matsumoto, Kazuo Yashima, Hajime Isomoto, Naoyuki Yamaguchi Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(3): 820. CrossRef
Current status of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for distal and hilar biliary obstruction Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Junya Sato, Hiroki Sakamoto, Takuya Doi, Hiroyuki Ono Digestive Endoscopy.2024; 36(9): 969. CrossRef
Biliary drainage in hilar and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: 25-year experience at a tertiary cancer center Ahmad Al Nakshabandi, Faisal S. Ali, Iyad Albustami, Hyunsoo Hwang, Wei Qiao, Nicole C. Johnston, Abdullah S. Shaikh, Emmanuel Coronel, Phillip S. Ge, William Ross, Brian Weston, Jeffrey H. Lee Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 99(6): 938. CrossRef
Safety and efficacy of biliary suprapapillary metal and plastic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Saqr Alsakarneh, Mahmoud Y. Madi, Fouad Jaber, Kamal Hassan, Yassine Kilani, Omar Al Ta’ani, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Amir H. Sohail, Laith Numan, Mohammad Bilal, Wissam Kiwan Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(8): 4186. CrossRef
Evaluating safety and efficacy of plastic versus metal stenting in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Xinjie Luo, Zhicheng Huang, Kamran Ali, Khizar Hayat Postgraduate Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Development of novel biliary metal stent with coil-spring structure and its application in vivo swine biliary stricture model In Rae Cho, Sang Hyub Lee, Jin Ho Choi, Namyoung Park, Min Woo Lee, Joo Seong Kim, Seok Jeong, Don Haeng Lee, Tae-Won Jeong, Byoung-Yun Ki, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic retrograde stent drainage therapies for malignant biliary obstruction: the distal opening of stent location above or across the duodenal papilla? A systematic review and meta-analysis Dong Fang, Yi Han, Chenglin Zhu, Zhenwang Shi, Deming Bao, Liming Wang, Qin Xu Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(9): 1071. CrossRef
Double‐scope method is helpful to rescue a retrieval thread attached to a stent caught on the duodenoscope forceps elevator Kengo Matsumoto, Dai Nakamatsu, Tsutomu Nishida Digestive Endoscopy.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The feasibility of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a single center Akihisa Ohno, Nao Fujimori, Toyoma Kaku, Masayuki Hijioka, Ken Kawabe, Naohiko Harada, Makoto Nakamuta, Takamasa Oono, Yoshihiro Ogawa Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(6): 784. CrossRef
Self‐expandable metal stents have longer patency and less cholangitis than inside stents in malignant perihilar biliary obstruction Akinobu Koiwai, Morihisa Hirota, Tomofumi Katayama, Ryo Kin, Keita Kawamura, Katsuya Endo, Takayuki Kogure, Atsuko Takasu, Takayoshi Meguro, Kennichi Satoh JGH Open.2022; 6(5): 317. CrossRef
Two-devices-in-one-channel method for preventing the preceding stent migration in case of multiple indwelling biliary inside plastic stents Tesshin Ban, Yoshimasa Kubota, Takuya Takahama, Shun Sasoh, Tomoaki Ando, Makoto Nakamura, Takashi Joh Endoscopy.2022; 54(S 02): E948. CrossRef
Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633. CrossRef
Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: When and how? Tudor Mocan, Adelina Horhat, Emil Mois, Florin Graur, Cristian Tefas, Rares Craciun, Iuliana Nenu, Mihaela Spârchez, Zeno Sparchez World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2021; 13(12): 2050. CrossRef
Changing Trends in Biliary Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Perihilar Obstructions Lubna Kamani, Muhammad Arshad Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(6): 636. CrossRef
Background /Aims: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of localized stenosis of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) for early detection of pancreatic cancer.
Methods Among 689 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde pancreatography from January 2008 to September 2018, 19 patients with MPD findings were enrolled. These patients showed findings for indicating suspicious pancreatic cancer at an early stage (FiCE); FiCE was defined as a single, localized stenosis in the MPD without a detectable mass (using any other imaging methods) and without other pancreatic diseases, such as definite chronic pancreatitis, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, and autoimmune pancreatitis. Final diagnoses were established by examining resected specimens or through follow-up examinations after an interval of >5 years.
Results Among 19 patients with FiCE, 11 underwent surgical resection and 8 were evaluated after a >5-year observation period. The final diagnosis of the MPD stenosis was judged to be pancreatic cancer in 9 patients (47%), including 3 with intraepithelial cancer, and to be a non-neoplastic change in 10. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of preoperative pancreatic juice cytology were 75%, 100%, and 88%, respectively.
Conclusions The predictive value of FiCE for pancreatic cancer prevalence was 47%. Histological confirmation with pancreatic juice cytology is necessary before surgical resection.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficient Assessment of Tumor Vascular Shutdown by Photodynamic Therapy on Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Using High-Speed Wide-Field Waterproof Galvanometer Scanner Photoacoustic Microscopy Jaeyul Lee, Sangyeob Han, Til Bahadur Thapa Magar, Pallavi Gurung, Junsoo Lee, Daewoon Seong, Sungjo Park, Yong-Wan Kim, Mansik Jeon, Jeehyun Kim International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(6): 3457. CrossRef
Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer Yasutaka ISHII, Masahiro SERIKAWA, Shinya NAKAMURA, Juri IKEMOTO, Shiro OKA Suizo.2024; 39(4): 247. CrossRef
Difference of Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in New-Onset Diabetes and Long-standing Diabetes: A Population-based Cohort Study Hee Seung Lee, Wonjeong Chae, Min Je Sung, Jiyoung Keum, Jung Hyun Jo, Moon Jae Chung, Jeong Youp Park, Seung Woo Park, Si Young Song, Eun-Cheol Park, Chung Mo Nam, Sung-In Jang, Seungmin Bang The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2023; 108(6): 1338. CrossRef
Pancreatic duct lavage cytology combined with a cell-block method for patients with possible pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, including pancreatic carcinoma in situ Hiroaki Kusunose, Shinsuke Koshita, Yoshihide Kanno, Takahisa Ogawa, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Hideyuki Anan, Kazuki Endo, Haruka Okano, Masaya Oikawa, Takashi Tsuchiya, Takashi Sawai, Yutaka Noda, Kei Ito Clinical Endoscopy.2023; 56(3): 353. CrossRef
Diagnostic Ability and Safety of Repeated Pancreatic Juice Cytology Using an Endoscopic Nasopancreatic Drainage Catheter for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study Shinya Nakamura, Yasutaka Ishii, Masahiro Serikawa, Keiji Hanada, Noriaki Eguchi, Tamito Sasaki, Yoshifumi Fujimoto, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Shinichiro Sugiyama, Bunjiro Noma, Michihiro Kamigaki, Tomoyuki Minami, Akihito Okazaki, Masanobu Yukutake, Teruo Mouri Diagnostics.2023; 13(16): 2696. CrossRef
Endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of high‐grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia Keiji Hanada, Akihiro Shimizu, Keisuke Kurihara, Morito Ikeda, Takuya Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Okuda, Susumu Tazuma Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(5): 927. CrossRef
Current Screening Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer Petr Vanek, Ondrej Urban, Vincent Zoundjiekpon, Premysl Falt Biomedicines.2022; 10(9): 2056. CrossRef
Pre-Operative Imaging and Pathological Diagnosis of Localized High-Grade Pancreatic Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia without Invasive Carcinoma Ryota Sagami, Kentaro Yamao, Jun Nakahodo, Ryuki Minami, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Kazunari Murakami, Yuji Amano Cancers.2021; 13(5): 945. CrossRef
New-Onset or Exacerbation of Diabetes Mellitus Is a Clue to the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Tetsuya Takikawa, Kazuhiro Kikuta, Kiyoshi Kume, Shin Hamada, Shin Miura, Naoki Yoshida, Seiji Hongo, Yu Tanaka, Ryotaro Matsumoto, Takanori Sano, Mio Ikeda, Masahiro Iseki, Michiaki Unno, Atsushi Masamune The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine.2020; 252(4): 353. CrossRef
Can Localized Stenosis of the Main Pancreatic Duct be a Predictive Factor for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer? Mamoru Takenaka, Kentaro Yamao, Masatoshi Kudo Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(6): 523. CrossRef
Background /Aims: It is often difficult to manage acute cholecystitis after metal stent (MS) placement in unresectable malignant biliary strictures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) for acute cholecystitis.
Methods The clinical outcomes of 10 patients who underwent EUS-GBD for acute cholecystitis after MS placement between January 2011 and August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The procedural outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) with tube placement (n=11 cases) and aspiration (PTGBA) (n=27 cases) during the study period were evaluated as a reference.
Results The technical success and clinical effectiveness rates of EUS-GBD were 90% (9/10) and 89% (8/9), respectively. Severe bile leakage that required surgical treatment occurred in one case. Acute cholecystitis recurred after stent dislocation in 38% (3/8) of the cases. Both PTGBD and PTGBA were technically successful in all cases without severe adverse events and clinically effective in 91% and 63% of the cases, respectively.
Conclusions EUS-GBD after MS placement was a feasible option for treating acute cholecystitis. However, it was a rescue technique following the established percutaneous intervention in the current setting because of the immature technical methodology, including dedicated devices, which need further development.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk factors and treatment strategies for cholecystitis after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study Akihiro Matsumi, Hironari Kato, Taiji Ogawa, Toru Ueki, Masaki Wato, Masakuni Fujii, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Ryo Harada, Yuki Ishihara, Masahiro Takatani, Hirofumi Tsugeno, Naoko Yunoki, Takeshi Tomoda, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Motoyuki Otsuka Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024; 100(1): 76. CrossRef
The updated Asia-Pacific consensus statement on the role of endoscopic management in malignant hilar biliary obstruction Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Santi Kulpatcharapong, Alan Chuncharunee, Christopher Khor, Benedict Devereaux, Jong Ho Moon, Thawee Ratanachu-ek, Hsiu Po Wang, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Amit Maydeo, Takao Itoi, Ryan Ponnudurai, Mohan Ramchandani, Yousuke Nakai, D Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(09): E1065. CrossRef
Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis induced after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary strictures: a retrospective study in Japan Fumisato Kozakai, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Haruka Okano, Yuto Matsuoka, Kento Hosokawa, Hidehito Sumiya, Kei Ito Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(5): 647. CrossRef
Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Recurrent Cholecystitis after Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent Placement for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction Akinori Maruta, Takuji Iwashita, Kaori Banno, Takuya Koizumi, Soichi Iritani, Kensaku Yoshida, Shogo Shimizu, Masahito Shimizu Internal Medicine.2023; 62(2): 237. CrossRef
Treatment Strategy for Acute Cholecystitis Induced by a Metallic Stent Placed in Malignant Biliary Strictures: Role of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Aspiration Fumisato Kozakai, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Takahisa Ogawa, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Hideyuki Anan, Haruka Okano, Kei Ito Internal Medicine.2023; 62(5): 673. CrossRef
Prospective feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel spiral dilator for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage Takahisa Ogawa, Yoshihide Kanno, Shinsuke Koshita, Hiroaki Kusunose, Toshitaka Sakai, Keisuke Yonamine, Kazuaki Miyamoto, Fumisato Kozakai, Haruka Okano, Hideyuki Anan, Kento Hosokawa, Kei Ito DEN Open.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cholecystostomy versus percutaneous cholecystostomy (PTC) in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Matheus Candido Hemerly, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Epifanio Silvino do Monte Junior, Igor Mendonça Proença, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Erika Yuki Yvamoto, Pedro Henrique Boraschi Vieira Ribas, Sergio A. Sánchez-Luna, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Eduardo G Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(4): 2421. CrossRef
Trial sequential analysis of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis Alessandro Cucchetti, Cecilia Binda, Elton Dajti, Monica Sbrancia, Giorgio Ercolani, Carlo Fabbri Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 95(3): 399. CrossRef
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: A Bridge to Less Morbidity Anil Kumar Singh The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology.2022; 06(01): 003. CrossRef
Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression Carlo Fabbri, Cecilia Binda, Monica Sbrancia, Elton Dajti, Chiara Coluccio, Giorgio Ercolani, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Cucchetti Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(11): 7974. CrossRef
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystogastrostomy as an alternative biliary drainage route in malignant obstructions Marco A. D’Assuncao, Fernando P. Marson, Saverio T. N. Armellini, Fernando L. Mota, Fernando J. S. de Oliveira, Eduardo M. A. Pereira Junior Endoscopy.2021; 53(07): E277. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting in high-risk surgical patients Hyung Ku Chon, Chan Park, Dong Eun Park, Tae Hyeon Kim Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2021; 20(5): 478. CrossRef
Endoscopic Management of Acute Cholecystitis Following Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Biliary Strictures: A View from the Inside Looking in Sean Bhalla, Ryan Law Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(3): 209. CrossRef
Background /Aims: This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for inaccurate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes without rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation.
Methods Eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for abdominal or mediastinal lymph nodes from January 2008 to June 2017 were included from a prospectively maintained EUS-FNA database and retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the detection of neoplastic diseases were calculated. Candidate factors for inaccurate diagnosis (lymph node size and location, needle type, puncture route, number of passes, and causative disease) were evaluated by comparison between accurately diagnosed cases and others.
Results The final diagnosis of the punctured lymph node was classified as neoplastic (65 cases: a metastatic lymph node, malignant lymphoma, or Crow-Fukase syndrome) or non-neoplastic (18 cases: a reactive node or amyloidosis). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, small size of the lymph node was the sole predictive factor for inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis with a significant difference (odds ratios, 19.8; 95% confidence intervals, 3.15–124; p=0.0015).
Conclusions The lymph node size of <16 mm was the only independent factor associated with inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Role of EBUS‐TBNA/EUS‐FNA and mass spectrometry for diagnosis and typing of lymph node amyloidosis: 10‐year experience in two tertiary care academic centers Asghar Naqvi, Michael Bonert, Christian Finley, Katarzyna Czarnecka‐Kujawa, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Joerg Schwock, Vathany Kulasingam, Rohan John, Hyang‐Mi Ko Cancer Cytopathology.2023; 131(11): 724. CrossRef
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Deep-Seated Lymphadenopathies and Spleen Lesions: A Monocentric Experience Flaminia Bellisario, Fabia Attili, Fabrizia Campana, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Silvia Bellesi, Elena Maiolo, Eleonora Alma, Rosalia Malafronte, Giuseppe Macis, Luigi Maria Larocca, Salvatore Annunziata, Francesco D’Alò, Stefan Hohaus Diagnostics.2023; 13(17): 2839. CrossRef
Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories Vladislav V. Makarenko, Michelle E. DeLelys, Robert P. Hasserjian, Amy Ly Cancer Cytopathology.2022; 130(2): 144. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT)-positive mediastinal lymphadenopathies in patients with thoracic or extra-thoracic mali Dominique Béchade, Carine Bellera, Lisa Gauquelin, Isabelle Soubeyran, Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau, Marc Debled, François Chomy, Guilhem Roubaud, Marianne Fonck, Simon Pernot, Alexandre Roch, Anne-Laure Cazeau Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology.2022; 46(5): 101912. CrossRef
High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Linbin Chen, Yin Li, Xiaoyan Gao, Shiyong Lin, Longjun He, Guangyu Luo, Jianjun Li, Chunyu Huang, Guobao Wang, Qing Yang, Hongbo Shan Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(8): 2763. CrossRef
Primary localized gastric amyloidosis: A scoping review of the literature from clinical presentations to prognosis Xin-Yu Lin, Dan Pan, Li-Xuan Sang, Bing Chang World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(12): 1132. CrossRef
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy Device for Lymphadenopathy Yuki Tanisaka, Masafumi Mizuide, Akashi Fujita, Tomoya Ogawa, Ryuichiro Araki, Masahiro Suzuki, Hiromune Katsuda, Youichi Saito, Kazuya Miyaguchi, Tomoaki Tashima, Yumi Mashimo, Masami Yasuda, Shomei Ryozawa, Konstantinos Triantafyllou Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
How to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of EUS-FNA in Abdominal and Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy? Tae Hyeon Kim Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(2): 93. CrossRef