Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Evaluation of Abdominal Lymphadenopathy of Unknown Etiology
Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Kotchakon Maipang, Tassanee Sriprayoon, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
Clin Endosc 2022;55(2):279-286.   Published online January 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.218-IDEN
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a standard procedure for obtaining tissue from lesions near the gastrointestinal lumen. However, there is a scarcity of information on the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown causes. To assess the accuracy of EUS-FNA in diagnosing abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology.
Methods
The EUS records of patients with undiagnosed abdominal lymphadenopathy between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed.
Results
A total of 42 patients were included in this study. Adequate specimens were obtained from 40 patients (95%). The final diagnoses were metastatic cancer (n=16), lymphoma (n=9), tuberculosis (n=8), inflammatory changes (n=6), and amyloidosis (n=1). For diagnosing malignancy, EUS-FNA had a sensitivity of 84.6%, specificity of 95.7%, positive predictive value of 91.7%, negative predictive value of 91.7%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.901. For the diagnosis of lymphoma, EUS-FNA was 100% accurate when combined with cytologic evaluation and immunohistochemical staining. The diagnostic sensitivity decreased to 75%, whereas the specificity remained 100%, for tuberculosis. The overall AUROC was 0.850. No procedure-related complications occurred.
Conclusions
EUS-FNA showed high diagnostic performance for abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown causes, especially malignancy, lymphoma, and tuberculosis. Therefore, it is a crucial diagnostic tool for this patient population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pancreatobiliary Lymphadenopathy: Etiology, Location, and Factors Predicting Good Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biopsy
    Taha Yaseen, Abbas Ali Tasneem, Syed Mudassir Laeeq, Zain Majid, Nasir Hassan Luck
    Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology.2024; 14(1): 40.     CrossRef
  • Choosing needles wisely: 19-G conventional vs. Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for malignant lymphoma diagnosis and classification
    Kajornvit Raghareutai, Worapoth Yingyongthawat, Nonthalee Pausawasdi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(4): 473.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology
    Wenli Wang, Chaoqun Han, Xin Ling, Xianwen Guo, Jun Liu, Rong Lin, Zhen Ding
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Detection of Lymphadenopathy as a Precursor to Autoimmune Liver Diseases Before Clinical Hepatitis Became Apparent: A Report of Two Cases
    Hiroshi Okano, Hiroki Tanaka, Shimpei Matsusaki, Katsumi Mukai, Akira Nishimura, Kana Asakawa, Youichirou Baba, Tetsuya Murata
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mediastinal Nodal Staging Performance of Combined Endobronchial and Esophageal Endosonography in Lung Cancer Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiaozhen Liu, Kun Yang, Weihong Guo, Muqi Ye, Shaozhong Liu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current role of endoscopic ultrasound for gastrointestinal and abdominal tuberculosis
    Hasan Maulahela, Achmad Fauzi, Kaka Renaldi, Qorina P Srisantoso, Amirah Jasmine
    JGH Open.2022; 6(11): 745.     CrossRef
  • 3,760 View
  • 249 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Common Bile Duct Dilatation without Identifiable Etiology Detected from Cross-Sectional Imaging
Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Penprapai Hongsrisuwan, Lubna Kamani, Kotchakon Maipang, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
Clin Endosc 2022;55(1):122-127.   Published online January 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.122
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is warranted when cross-sectional imaging demonstrates common bile duct (CBD) dilatation without identifiable causes. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of EUS in CBD dilatation of unknown etiology.
Methods
Retrospective review of patients with dilated CBD without definite causes undergoing EUS between 2012 and 2017.
Results
A total of 131 patients were recruited. The mean age was 63.2±14.1 years. The most common manifestation was abnormal liver chemistry (85.5%). The mean CBD diameter was 12.2±4.1 mm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of EUS-identified pathologies, including malignancy, choledocholithiasis, and benign biliary stricture (BBS), was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.00). The AUROC of EUS for detecting malignancy, choledocholithiasis, and BBS was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97), 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99), respectively. Male sex, alanine aminotransferase ≥3× the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≥3× the ULN, and intrahepatic duct dilatation were predictors for pathological obstruction, with odds ratios of 5.46 (95%CI, 1.74-17.1), 5.02 (95% CI, 1.48-17.0), 4.63 (95% CI, 1.1-19.6), and 4.03 (95% CI, 1.37-11.8), respectively.
Conclusions
EUS provides excellent diagnostic value in identifying the etiology of CBD dilatation detected by cross-sectional imaging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Incidental findings of gallbladder and bile ducts – Management strategies: Normal findings, anomalies, “silent gallstones” and bile duct dilatation - A World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) position paper
    Christian Jenssen, Christian P. Nolsøe, Torben Lorentzen, Jae Young Lee, Nitin Chaubal, Kathleen Möller, Caroline Ewertsen, Xin Wu Cui, Edda Leonor Chaves, Alina Popescu, Yi Dong, Christoph F. Dietrich
    WFUMB Ultrasound Open.2024; 2(1): 100034.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound in dilated common bile duct with non-diagnostic cross-sectional imaging
    Ankit Mahajan, Kshaunish Das, Kishalaya, Debashis Misra, Kausik Das, Gopal Krishna Dhali
    BMC Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of unexplained extrahepatic bile duct dilatation
    Long-Jiang Chen, Xiao-Yi Wang, Jian-Hua Dai, Zhi-Gang Tang
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 35(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound Connection: Unity Is Strength, or the Endoscopic Ultrasonography Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Concept
    Claudio Giovanni De Angelis, Eleonora Dall’Amico, Maria Teresa Staiano, Marcantonio Gesualdo, Mauro Bruno, Silvia Gaia, Marco Sacco, Federica Fimiano, Anna Mauriello, Simone Dibitetto, Chiara Canalis, Rosa Claudia Stasio, Alessandro Caneglias, Federica Me
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(20): 3265.     CrossRef
  • Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Evaluating Unexplained Isolated Common Bile Duct Dilation on Imaging
    Seifeldin Hakim, Amrita Sethi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • 4,227 View
  • 206 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP