Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Samuel Han"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Brief Reports
Use of an endoscopic powered debridement device for treatment of post-surgical fatty pancreatic necrosis
Judy Daboul, Shiab Mussad, Anna Cecilia Amaral, Waleed K. Hussain, Peter J. Lee, Samuel Han
Clin Endosc 2024;57(3):412-414.   Published online February 23, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.120
PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
  • 2,180 View
  • 119 Download
Close layer
Feasibility of single-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant recipients with abnormal liver function tests
Samuel Han, Sajid Jalil, Jeffery R. Groce, Somashekar G. Krishna, Luis Lara, Peter J. Lee, Georgios I. Papachristou, Khalid Mumtaz
Clin Endosc 2023;56(6):823-826.   Published online March 13, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.134
PDFPubReaderePub

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy is Safe and Effective in Post Liver Transplant Patients
    Joshua L Hudson, Amy Brownlee, Neil D Shah, Todd H Baron
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endo-Hepatology: The Buzz Goes Much beyond Liver Biopsy—A Narrative Review
    Rajesh Puri, Zubin Sharma, Swapnil Dhampalwar, Abhishek Kathuria, Bimal Sahu
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(04): 227.     CrossRef
  • 1,600 View
  • 101 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Quality Indicators in Barrett’s Esophagus: Time to Change the Status Quo
Samuel Han, Sachin Wani
Clin Endosc 2018;51(4):344-351.   Published online July 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.099
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The push for high quality care in all fields of medicine highlights the importance of establishing and adhering to quality indicators.In response, several gastrointestinal societies have established quality indicators specific to Barrett’s esophagus, which serve to createthresholds for performance while standardizing practice and guiding value-based care. Recent studies, however, have consistentlydemonstrated the lack of adherence to these quality indicators, particularly in surveillance (appropriate utilization of endoscopy andobtaining biopsies using the Seattle protocol) and endoscopic eradication therapy practices. These findings suggest that innovativeinterventions are needed to address these shortcomings in order to deliver high quality care to patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders
    Alexander T Reddy, Joshua P Lee, David A Leiman
    Diseases of the Esophagus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Residing in Below Median Household Income Districts on Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Barrett’s Esophagus
    Suqing Li, Yusuke Fujiyoshi, Sechiv Jugnundan, Gary May, Norman Marcon, Jeffrey Mosko, Christopher Teshima
    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.2023; 6(4): 137.     CrossRef
  • Clinical variation in surveillance and management of Barrett’s esophagus: A cross-sectional study of gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons
    Jamielyn DC Cruz, David Paculdo, Divya Ganesan, Meredith Baker, Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne, Nicholas J Shaheen, Sachin Wani, John W Peabody
    Medicine.2022; 101(51): e32187.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Self-Expandable Metal Stent Complications in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Connor K. Wilson, Sara R. Frankowski, Susan C. Steelman, Issam Makhoul
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2020; 2(8): 1163.     CrossRef
  • 5,873 View
  • 102 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP