Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
11 "Esophageal stenosis"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Health-Care Utilization and Complications of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilation in a National Population
Abhinav Goyal, Kshitij Chatterjee, Sujani Yadlapati, Shailender Singh
Clin Endosc 2017;50(4):366-371.   Published online March 17, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.155
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Esophageal stricture is usually managed with outpatient endoscopic dilation. However, patients with food impaction or failure to thrive undergo inpatient dilation. Esophageal perforation is the most feared complication, and its risk in inpatient setting is unknown.
Methods
We used National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for 2007–2013. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify patients with esophageal strictures. Logistic regression was used to assess association between hospital/patient characteristics and utilization of esophageal dilation.
Results
There were 591,187 hospitalizations involving esophageal stricture; 4.2% were malignant. Endoscopic dilation was performed in 28.7% cases. Dilation was more frequently utilized (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; p<0.001), had higher in-hospital mortality (3.1% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001), and resulted in longer hospital stays (5 days vs. 4 days, p=0.01), among cases of malignant strictures. Esophageal perforation was more common in the malignant group (0.9% vs. 0.5%, p=0.007). Patients with malignant compared to benign strictures undergoing dilation were more likely to require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy (PEG/J) tube (14.1% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001). Palliative care services were utilized more frequently in malignant stricture cases not treated with dilation compared to those that were dilated.
Conclusions
Inpatient endoscopic dilation was utilized in 29% cases of esophageal stricture. Esophageal perforation, although infrequent, is more common in malignant strictures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Safety of a Novel Upper Esophageal Sphincter Balloon Dilator
    Grace M. Wandell, Janeth Garcia Swartwood, Ashar Singh Brar, Gregory N. Postma, Peter C. Belafsky
    The Laryngoscope.2025; 135(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Diffuse Esophageal Spasm: An Alternative Treatment Approach
    McKenzie K Allen , Wayne Frei
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adverse events associated with EGD and EGD-related techniques
    Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, Nauzer Forbes, Nirav C. Thosani, Andrew C. Storm, Swati Pawa, Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Larissa L. Fujii-Lau, Sherif Elhanafi, Audrey H. Calderwood, James L. Buxbaum, Richard S. Kwon, Stuart K. Amateau, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad, Bashar J.
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 96(3): 389.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Update 2020
    Gregorios A. Paspatis, Marianna Arvanitakis, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Marc Barthet, Brian Saunders, Stine Ydegaard Turino, Angad Dhillon, Maria Fragaki, Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Alessandro Repici, Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Jeanin E. van Hooft
    Endoscopy.2020; 52(09): 792.     CrossRef
  • Acute coronary syndromes in the peri‐operative period after kidney transplantation in United States
    Abhinav Goyal, Kevin Bryan Lo, Kshitij Chatterjee, Roy O. Mathew, Peter A. McCullough, Sripal Bangalore, Janani Rangaswami
    Clinical Transplantation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Five-year single-centre experience of carcinoma of the oesophagus from Blantyre, Malawi
    John David Chetwood, Peter J Finch, Anstead Kankwatira, Jane Mallewa, Melita A Gordon, Leo Masamba
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2018; 5(1): e000232.     CrossRef
  • Safe and Proper Management of Esophageal Stricture Using Endoscopic Esophageal Dilation
    Jae Jin Hwang
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(4): 309.     CrossRef
  • 12,738 View
  • 133 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
An Intractable Caustic Esophageal Stricture Successfully Managed with Sequential Treatment Comprising Incision with an Insulated-Tip Knife, Balloon Dilation, and an Oral Steroid
Woong Ki Lee, Byung Sun Kim, Min A Yang, So Hee Yun, Young Jae Lee, Ji Woong Kim, Jin Woong Cho
Clin Endosc 2016;49(6):560-563.   Published online August 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.048
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Bougie or balloon dilation is a good short-term treatment for caustic esophageal strictures, although recurrence after dilation occurs in approximately 30% of these cases. Therefore, long-term treatment options are required in some cases, and endoscopic incisional therapy has been used for patients with an anastomotic stricture in the gastrointestinal tract. A 58-year-old woman presented with severe swallowing difficulty because of a caustic esophageal stricture, which was caused by accidental exposure to anhydrous acetic acid at infancy. She had undergone several previous bougie and balloon dilations but the stricture did not improve. We performed sequential treatment comprising incision with an insulated-tip knife, balloon dilation, and an oral steroid, which resulted in the patient’s symptoms markedly improving. Thus, we report this case of an intractable caustic esophageal stricture, which was successfully treated using combined endoscopic sequential treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A new simple endoscopic incision therapy for refractory benign oesophageal anastomotic stricture
    Jeongmin Choi, Soo In Choi
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(3): e239798.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic incision for treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures
    Chengbai Liang, Yuyong Tan, Jiaxi Lu, Meixian Le, Deliang Liu
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2020; 14(6): 445.     CrossRef
  • 8,022 View
  • 194 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Deepanshu Jain, Shashideep Singhal
Clin Endosc 2016;49(3):241-256.   Published online March 7, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.099
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Advances in diagnostic modalities and improvement in surveillance programs for Barrett esophagus has resulted in an increase in the incidence of superficial esophageal cancers (SECs). SEC, due to their limited metastatic potential, are amenable to non-invasive treatment modalities. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are some of the new modalities that gastroenterologists have used over the last decade to diagnose and treat SEC. However, esophageal stricture (ES) is a very common complication and a major cause of morbidity post-ESD. In the past few years, there has been a tremendous effort to reduce the incidence of ES among patients undergoing ESD. Steroids have shown the most consistent results over time with minimal complications although the preferred mode of delivery is debatable, with both systemic and local therapy having pros and cons for specific subgroups of patients. Newer modalities such as esophageal stents, autologous cell sheet transplantation, polyglycolic acid, and tranilast have shown promising results but the depth of experience with these methods is still limited. We have summarized case reports, prospective single center studies, and randomized controlled trials describing the various methods intended to reduce the incidence of ES after ESD. Indications, techniques, outcomes, limitations, and reported complications are discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors of refractory post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal strictures
    Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado Robles, Tom G. Moreels , Hubert Piessevaux , Ralph Yeung, Tarik Aouattah , Pierre H. Deprez
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Esophageal Cancer
    Mike T. Wei, Shai Friedland
    Gastroenterology Clinics of North America.2021; 50(4): 791.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Resection in the Management of Esophageal Neoplasia
    Don C. Codipilly, Prasad G. Iyer
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2020; 18(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Short-Term Efficacy Between Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treatment of Wide Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Early Stage
    Yuan Li, Keyi Wang, Yanyan Shi, Jin Zhu, Rongli Cui, Hejun Zhang, Shigang Ding
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 54(6): 512.     CrossRef
  • Retrograde percutaneous transgastric esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a peculiar endoscopic submucosal dissection technique for therapy of esophageal cancer with esophageal stenosis after chemoradiation therapy
    Yugo Suzuki, Toshiro Iizuka, Daisuke Kikuchi, Masaki Ueno, Shu Hoteya
    VideoGIE.2020; 5(11): 527.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett’s neoplasia: a meta-analysis
    Dennis Yang, Fei Zou, Sican Xiong, Justin J. Forde, Yu Wang, Peter V. Draganov
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(6): 1383.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of long-segment Barrett’s adenocarcinoma by complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection: a case report
    Miki Kaneko, Akira Mitoro, Motoyuki Yoshida, Masayoshi Sawai, Yasushi Okura, Masanori Furukawa, Tadashi Namisaki, Kei Moriya, Takemi Akahane, Hideto Kawaratani, Mitsuteru Kitade, Kousuke Kaji, Hiroaki Takaya, Yasuhiko Sawada, Kenichiro Seki, Shinya Sato,
    BMC Gastroenterology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Treatment for Esophageal Cancer
    Yang Won Min
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 71(3): 116.     CrossRef
  • Effect of polyglycolic acid sheet plus esophageal stent placement in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early-stage esophageal cancer: A randomized, controlled trial
    Ning-Li Chai, Jia Feng, Long-Song Li, Sheng-Zhen Liu, Chen Du, Qi Zhang, En-Qiang Linghu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(9): 1046.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with better clinical outcomes
    Byeong Geun Song, Yang Won Min, Ra Ri Cha, Hyuk Lee, Byung-Hoon Min, Jun Haeng Lee, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Jae J. Kim
    BMC Gastroenterology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett’s early neoplasia: a multicenter study in the United States
    Dennis Yang, Roxana M. Coman, Michel Kahaleh, Irving Waxman, Andrew Y. Wang, Amrita Sethi, Ashish R. Shah, Peter V. Draganov
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 86(4): 600.     CrossRef
  • Esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection treated successfully by temporary stent placement
    Takahisa Yamasaki, Toshihiko Tomita, Mayu Takimoto, Yoshio Ohda, Tadayuki Oshima, Hirokazu Fukui, Jiro Watari, Hiroto Miwa
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 9(6): 337.     CrossRef
  • Esophageal subepithelial tumor: why tunneling?
    Jong-Jae Park
    Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 10,087 View
  • 188 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Predictors of Esophageal Stricture Formation Post Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Bashar Qumseya, Abraham M. Panossian, Cynthia Rizk, David Cangemi, Christianne Wolfsen, Massimo Raimondo, Timothy Woodward, Michael B. Wallace, Herbert Wolfsen
Clin Endosc 2014;47(2):155-161.   Published online March 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.2.155
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Stricture formation is a common complication after endoscopic mucosal resection. Predictors of stricture formation have not been well studied.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study by using a prospective endoscopic mucosal resection database in a tertiary referral center. For each patient, we extracted the age, sex, lesion size, use of ablative therapy, and detection of esophageal strictures. The primary outcome was the presence of esophageal stricture at follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the primary outcome and predictors.

Results

Of 136 patients, 27% (n=37) had esophageal strictures. Thirty-two percent (n=44) needed endoscopic dilation to relieve dysphagia (median, 2; range, 1 to 8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the lesion excised is associated with increased odds of having a stricture (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.3; p=0.01), when controlling for age, sex, and ablative modalities. Similarly, the number of lesions removed in the index procedure was associated with increased odds of developing a stricture (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.2; p=0.007).

Conclusions

Stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection is common. Risk factors for stricture formation include large mucosal resections and the resection of multiple lesions on the initial procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Simplified Versus Standard Radiofrequency Ablation Protocols for Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sagar Shah, Mary Kathryn Roccato, Samuel Ji, Neil Jariwalla, Spencer Kozik, Ronald Dungca Ortizo, Anastasia Chahine, Jennifer M. Kolb, Jason B. Samarasena
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • A reliable nomogram model for predicting esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Guodong Yang, Zhao Mu, Ke Pu, Yulin Chen, Luoyao Zhang, Haiyue Zhou, Peng Luo, Xiaoying Zhang
    Medicine.2022; 101(5): e28741.     CrossRef
  • Management of esophageal strictures after endoscopic resection for early neoplasia
    Einas Abou Ali, Arthur Belle, Rachel Hallit, Benoit Terris, Frédéric Beuvon, Mahaut Leconte, Anthony Dohan, Sarah Leblanc, Solène Dermine, Lola-Jade Palmieri, Romain Coriat, Stanislas Chaussade, Maximilien Barret
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lesion size and circumferential range identified as independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Meihong Chen, Yini Dang, Chao Ding, Jiajia Yang, Xinmin Si, Guoxin Zhang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(9): 4065.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for serious adverse events associated with multiband mucosectomy in Barrett’s esophagus: an international multicenter analysis of 3827 endoscopic resection procedures
    Kamar Belghazi, Norman Marcon, Christopher Teshima, Kenneth K. Wang, Reza V. Milano, Nahid Mostafavi, Michael B. Wallace, Pujan Kandel, Lady Katherine Mejía Pérez, Michael J. Bourke, Farzan Bahin, Martin A. Everson, Rehan Haidry, Gregory G. Ginsberg, Gene
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 92(2): 259.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Resection in the Management of Esophageal Neoplasia
    Don C. Codipilly, Prasad G. Iyer
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2020; 18(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Issues and controversies in esophageal inlet patch
    Adriana Ciocalteu, Petrica Popa, Mircea Ionescu, Dan Ionut Gheonea
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(30): 4061.     CrossRef
  • Radiofrequency ablation in patients with large cervical heterotopic gastric mucosa and globus sensation: Closing the treatment gap
    Ivan Kristo, Erwin Rieder, Matthias Paireder, Katrin Schwameis, Gerd Jomrich, Werner Dolak, Thomas Parzefall, Martin Riegler, Reza Asari, Sebastian F. Schoppmann
    Digestive Endoscopy.2018; 30(2): 212.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett’s neoplasia: a meta-analysis
    Dennis Yang, Fei Zou, Sican Xiong, Justin J. Forde, Yu Wang, Peter V. Draganov
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(6): 1383.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett’s esophagus: Adverse outcomes, patient values, and cost-effectiveness
    Swarup Kumar, Prasad G. Iyer
    Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 20(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in Barrett's esophagus
    John Inadomi, Hani Alastal, Luigi Bonavina, Seth Gross, Richard H. Hunt, Hiroshi Mashimo, Massimiliano di Pietro, Horace Rhee, Marmy Shah, Salvatore Tolone, David H. Wang, Shao‐Hua Xie
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2018; 1434(1): 227.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal cancer: Where do we go from here?
    Tavankit Singh, Madhusudhan R Sanaka, Prashanthi N Thota
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 10(9): 165.     CrossRef
  • Ablation Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus: New Rules for Changing Times
    Nour Hamade, Prateek Sharma
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Resection and Ablation for Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer
    Stephanie Worrell, Steven R. DeMeester
    Thoracic Surgery Clinics.2016; 26(2): 173.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus
    Ashley H. Davis-Yadley, Kevin G. Neill, Mokenge P. Malafa, Luis R. Peña
    Cancer Control.2016; 23(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection
    Joo Ha Hwang, Vani Konda, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, Shailendra S. Chauhan, Brintha K. Enestvedt, Larissa L. Fujii-Lau, Sri Komanduri, John T. Maple, Faris M. Murad, Rahul Pannala, Nirav C. Thosani, Subhas Banerjee
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 82(2): 215.     CrossRef
  • When Is Pre-Emptive Treatment Necessary after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Early Esophageal Neoplasm?
    Hyung Gil Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(2): 124.     CrossRef
  • 8,832 View
  • 64 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Intralesional Steroid Injection to Prevent Stricture after Near-Circumferential Endosopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer
Wook Jin Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Do Hoon Kim, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Jin-Ho Kim
Clin Endosc 2013;46(6):643-646.   Published online November 19, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.6.643
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Stricture frequently occurs after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal carcinoma with near- or whole-circumferential mucosal defects, and post-ESD stricture is difficult to treat and usually requires multiple sessions of endoscopic balloon dilatation. Intralesional steroid injection has previously been used to prevent stricture; however, there have been few experiences with this method after near- or whole-circumferential ESD. We present a case of a single session of intralesional steroid injection performed immediately after near-circumferential ESD to prevent post-ESD stricture. After a follow-up period of 6 months, the patient showed good outcome without dysphagia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent Advances of Biomedical Materials for Prevention of Post-ESD Esophageal Stricture
    Yuchen Bao, Zhenguang Li, Yingze Li, Tao Chen, Yu Cheng, Meidong Xu
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of human keratinocyte sheets transplanted onto porcine excised esophagus after submucosal dissection in an ex vivo model
    Yosuke Kawai, Ryo Takagi, Takeshi Ohki, Masakazu Yamamoto, Masayuki Yamato
    Regenerative Therapy.2020; 15: 323.     CrossRef
  • White coat status is a predictive marker for post-esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection stricture: a retrospective study
    Keitaro Takahashi, Mikihiro Fujiya, Nobuhiro Ueno, Takeshi Saito, Yuya Sugiyama, Yuki Murakami, Takuya Iwama, Takahiro Sasaki, Masami Ijiri, Kazuyuki Tanaka, Aki Sakatani, Katsuyoshi Ando, Yoshiki Nomura, Shin Kashima, Mitsuru Goto, Kentaro Moriichi, Tosh
    Esophagus.2019; 16(3): 258.     CrossRef
  • Roles of Steroids in Preventing Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Resection
    Yu Qiu, Ruihua Shi
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes of a primary complete endoscopic resection strategy for short-segment Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and/or early esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Farzan F. Bahin, Mahesh Jayanna, Luke F. Hourigan, Reginald V. Lord, David Whiteman, Stephen J. Williams, Eric Y.T. Lee, Michael J. Bourke
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 83(1): 68.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for a large esophageal subepithelial leiomyoma to prevent postprocedural stenosis
    Wen‐Hsin Hsu, Meng‐Shun Sun, Hoi‐Wan Lo, Ching‐Yang Tsai, Yu‐Jou Tsai
    Advances in Digestive Medicine.2016; 3(3): 115.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasm: A Growing Body of Evidence
    Eun Jeong Gong, Hwoon-Yong Jung
    Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Deepanshu Jain, Shashideep Singhal
    Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(3): 241.     CrossRef
  • Ten-year experience of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms in a single center
    Hyung Chul Park, Do Hoon Kim, Eun Jeong Gong, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Wook Jung, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Jin-Ho Kim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2016; 31(6): 1064.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review: the prevention of oesophageal stricture after endoscopic resection
    M. Barret, B. Beye, S. Leblanc, F. Beuvon, S. Chaussade, F. Batteux, F. Prat
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2015; 42(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic cell sheet transplantation device developed by using a 3-dimensional printer and its feasibility evaluation in a porcine model
    Masanori Maeda, Nobuo Kanai, Shinichiro Kobayashi, Takahiro Hosoi, Ryo Takagi, Takashi Ohki, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Masayuki Yamato, Susumu Eguchi, Fumio Fukai, Teruo Okano
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 82(1): 147.     CrossRef
  • 6,485 View
  • 92 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A Case of Esophageal Carcinoma after an Esophageal Reconstruction Operation for Sulfuric Acid Injury
Eun Seo Park, M.D., Suck-Ho Lee, M.D., Chang Kyun Lee, M.D., Bo Yong Jung, M.D., Il-Kwun Chung, M.D., Sun-Joo Kim, M.D., Sang Byung Bae, M.D. and Ji-Hye Lee, M.D.*
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41(4):214-218.   Published online October 30, 2010
AbstractAbstract PDF
Patients with corrosive esophageal strictures have a high risk of developing carcinoma of the esophagus. For this reason, it is often recommended that resection of the esophagus should be considered for chronic caustic strictures in order to prevent the development of carcinoma. A 49-year-old woman who had undergone an esophagogastrectomy due to esophageal caustic stricture at the age of 23 was admitted with a 2-month history of dysphagia. Esophagoscopy showed a benign postoperative stricture in the remnant esophagus. After endoscopic balloon dilation of the stricture, which was about 5 cm in length, an ulcerative mass was noted distal to the stricture. This mass was diagnosed as squamous cell carcionoma. Nearly all the patients with corrosive carcinomas in the published literature had consumed an alkali drink, but our patient had a history of sulfuric acid ingestion. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;41:214-218)
  • 2,224 View
  • 11 Download
Close layer
수술 후 문합부 식도 협착에서 내시경적 중재술 후 재협착에 영향을 주는 인자들
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2003;27(5):407-407.   Published online November 20, 2003
PDF
  • 1,535 View
  • 2 Download
Close layer
A Case of Congenital Esophageal Stenosis Due to Tracheobronchial Remnants in Adult
Won Seok Jeong, M.D., Yoon Tae Jeen, M.D., Hoon Jai Chun, M.D., Du Rang Kim, M.D.,
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2003;26(1):21-25.   Published online January 30, 2003
AbstractAbstract PDF
Congenital stenosis of the esophagus is a rare form of esophageal stenosis in adults. The main causes of congenital esophageal stenosis are the esophageal web, esophageal stricture due to tracheobronchial remnants, and idiopathic esophageal muscular hypertrophy. Recently we have experienced a 32-year-old male with dysphagia, indigestion, postprandial chest discomfort who was diagnosed as congenital esophageal stenosis due to tracheobronchial remnant. The esophagogram showed stricture of the distal esophagus with secondary proximal dilatation and endoscopic finding revealed marked stenosis on the distal esophagus with normal surrounding mucosa. The esophageal manometric finding showed decreased body peristalsis and incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. The patient was treated by surgical resection of the stenotic segment with end to end anastomosis. We report this rare case of adult type tracheobronchial remnant with analysis of various worldwide report and with brief review of literature. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2003;26:21⁣25)
  • 2,296 View
  • 10 Download
Close layer
증례 : 식도 위장관 ; 악성 식도협착에서의 금속제 확장형 Wallstent 인공식도삽관술 ( Case Reports : Esophagus , Stomach & Intestine ; Self - expanding Wallstent for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Esophageal Stenosis )
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1995;15(4):704-711.   Published online November 30, 1994
AbstractAbstract PDF
The main objective of palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis is rapid restoration of passage of fluid and solids. Endoscopic intubation with plastic endoprosthesis may lead to prompt relief of dysphagia and is a effective procedure for the palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis. However, the insertion procedure, which necessitates prior dilatation, is traumatic and associated with considerable risk for perforation and bleeding. Tumor overgrowth, stent migration and stent blockage are frequent complications. Recently, self expanding metal stents woven in the form of tubular mesh made from surgical grade stainless steel alloy filaments(Wallstent), have been developed to offer possible advatage over conventional plastic tubes. The small diameter of introducer system carrying the compressed stent(18Fr) allows a relatively easy insertion procedure that dose not require prior dilatation. This stent is pliable. self-expanding and flexible in the longitudinal axis. We experienced a case of a 74-year-old male with malignant esophageal stenosis in whom self-expanding Wallstent was implanted with successful oral nutrition and much improvement of dysphagia. (Kor J Gastrointest Endosc 15: 704-709, 1995)
  • 1,300 View
  • 2 Download
Close layer
증례 : 악성 식도협착에서의 금속제 확장형 EsophaCoilTM 인공식도삽관술 ( Case Reports : Self - Expanding EsophaCoilTM Esophageal Prosthesis for Malignant Esophageal Stenosis )
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1995;15(1):63-71.   Published online November 30, 1994
AbstractAbstract PDF
Endoscopic endoprosthesis is well established as a cheap, fast and durable procedure for palliation of malignant dysphagia. But the placement of conventional endoprosthesis is difficult and is associated with significant complications such as hemorrhage, perforation and dysfunction of the prosthesis. Recently, self -expand- able metal prosthesis have also been utilized for malignant esophageal stenosis, and palliation of this modality seems to be more effective than other modalities. However the main problems with these metal stents are tumor ingrowth leading to reobstruction, migration, and eophageal trauma by the distal, hard skirt of the stent. EsophaCoil stent is a simple coil with close loops made from a single flat wire of nickel titanium alloy. The radial force of this material is much stronger than stainless steel, expansion time is faster and the stent is able to dilate even extremely resistant strictures. This new metalic stent seems to have several advantages over the current commnerically available ones. We report our experiences with this EsophaCoil stent and review of literature.
  • 1,429 View
  • 2 Download
Close layer
악성 식도협착에서의 금속제 확장형 UltraflexTM 인공식도삽관술 ( Self - Expanding UltraflexTM Esophageal Prosthesis of Malignant Esophageal Stenosis )
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1993;13(1):31-35.   Published online November 30, 1992
AbstractAbstract PDF
Endoscopic intubation is well established as a cheap, fast and durable procedure for palliation of malignant dysphagia. However, the placement of conventional esophageal endopros-thesis is difficult in some cases and this procedure is associated with significant complications such as perforation, hemorrhage and dysfunetion of the prosthesis in the long term. The self-expanding metallic stents offer an attractive alternative to conventional esophageal stents. These can be compressed into and inserted through a small lumen catheter, making placement easier, safer and less painful to patients. But, open mesh of self-expanding metallic stent such as Wallstent allows tumor ingrowth, unfinished wire ends can lead to perforation and bleeding, and immense stent shortening makes precise positioning difficult. Inflammatory response at site of the metal strut, difficulty in retrieving prostheses that place and very expensiveness in cost-benefit analysis are also problems. Recently developed Ultraflex" esophageal prosthesis is knitted from single strand of Elastalloy' wire, undulates to conform with normal esophageal peristalsis, maintaining patency and promoting patient comfort. Unlike other metallic stent that have sharp, bare-wire ends, the Ultraflex' Stent has smooth looped ends, with Teco-flex coating, which provide an atraumatic transition from the stent to the esophageal wall. We experienced a case of a 60-year old male with malignant stenosis of esophageal cancer in whom Ultraflex esophageal prosthesis was implanted with successful oral nutrition.
  • 1,560 View
  • 2 Download
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP