Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Insertion"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Focused Review Series: Training in Endoscopy
Training in Endoscopy: Enteroscopy
Jinsu Kim
Clin Endosc 2017;50(4):328-333.   Published online July 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.089
AbstractAbstract PDF
The balloon-assisted enteroscope has been regarded as the standard device for direct visualization of deep small bowels and allows for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disease. At the beginning, its application was focused on the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, and small bowel tumor. However, the indications are being expanded to various therapeutic procedures, not only confined to bleeding control. With the expansion of the indications, the need to perform enteroscopy effectively and safely is increasing. Recent studies have been focused on the diagnostic yield, therapeutic yield, and long-term outcomes of the device. However, with the increasing number of procedures, procedural guidelines and quality indicators are also needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical applications of device-assisted enteroscopy: a comprehensive review
    Kambiz S. Kadkhodayan, Shayan Irani
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025; 101(5): 950.     CrossRef
  • Cordless Miniature Robots from Centimeter to Nanometer Scale: Recent Progress and Future Challenges in Biomedicine Field
    Xiaowen Wang, Yingnan Gao, Changyou Liu, Yaping Wang, Anqin Liu, Wenguang Yang
    Advanced Materials Technologies.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Performance of pan‐enteroscopy in children with intestinal failure due to short bowel syndrome: A single‐center retrospective study
    Jonathan A. Salazar, Christina Chan, Enju Liu, Fatima Hamroud, Amit S. Grover, Victor L. Fox, Peter D. Ngo, Lissette Jimenez, Christopher P. Duggan, Alexandra N. Carey
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2024; 79(4): 915.     CrossRef
  • Research Progress of the Use of Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy (BAE) in Small Bowel Diseases
    芸玲 李
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(09): 555.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Pathology in Children
    Amornluck Krasaelap, Diana G. Lerner, Salvatore Oliva
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2023; 33(2): 423.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of symptomatic hamartomas of the jejunum and ileum
    N Farkas, M Conroy, M Baig
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2022; 104(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features of Small Bowel Tumors Diagnosed by Video Capsule Endoscopy and Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Single Center Experience
    Ah Young Yoo, Beom Jae Lee, Won Shik Kim, Seong Min Kim, Seung Han Kim, Moon Kyung Joo, Hyo Jung Kim, Jong-Jae Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Device-assisted enteroscopy training. A rapid review
    Federico Soria Gálvez, Octavio López-Albors, Pilar Esteban Delgado, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado Robles, Rafael Latorre Reviriego
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Retrieval of Small Intestinal Foreign Bodies: A KASID Multicenter Study
    Jeongseok Kim, Beom Jae Lee, Nam Seok Ham, Eun Hye Oh, Kee Don Choi, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Chang Soo Eun, Jin Su Kim, Dong-Hoon Yang
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Enteroscopy in children and adults with inflammatory bowel disease
    Giovanni Di Nardo, Gianluca Esposito, Chiara Ziparo, Federica Micheli, Luigi Masoni, Maria Pia Villa, Pasquale Parisi, Maria Beatrice Manca, Flavia Baccini, Vito Domenico Corleto
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(39): 5944.     CrossRef
  • Enteroscopy in children
    Giovanni Di Nardo, Carlo Calabrese, Roberto Conti Nibali, Arianna De Matteis, Emanuele Casciani, Luigi Martemucci, Giuseppe Pagliaro, Nico Pagano
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018; 6(7): 961.     CrossRef
  • Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy for Occult Bleeding
    Laura Mans, Marianna Arvanitakis, Horst Neuhaus, Jacques Devière
    Digestive Diseases.2018; 36(4): 325.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive review of outcomes of endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding
    Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2018; 7(3): 123.     CrossRef
  • Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy and Capsule Endoscopy in Suspected Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease
    Hsu-Heng Yen, Chen-Wang Chang, Jen-Wei Chou, Shu-Chen Wei
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(5): 417.     CrossRef
  • 10,942 View
  • 279 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Introduction to Starting Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Proper Insertion, Complete Observation, and Appropriate Photographing
Kyung Sik Park
Clin Endosc 2015;48(4):279-284.   Published online July 24, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.4.279
AbstractAbstract PDF

Diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the most basic of endoscopy procedures and is the technique that trainee doctors first learn. Mastering the basics of endoscopy is very important because when this process is imprecise or performed incorrectly, it can severely affect a patient's health or life. Although there are several guidelines and studies that consider these basics, there are still no standard recommendations for endoscopy in Korea. In this review, basic points, including proper endoscope insertion, precise observation without blind spots, and appropriate photographing, for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy will be discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Oral Breathing Facilitates Endoscopic Operability Compared With Nasal Breathing in Peroral Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Keitaro Takahashi, Takuya Iwama, Momotaro Muto, Kazuyuki Tanaka, Yu Kobayashi, Katsuyoshi Ando, Shin Kashima, Nobuhiro Ueno, Kentaro Moriichi, Hiroki Tanabe, Kazumichi Harada, Takashi Teramoto, Mikihiro Fujiya
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 120(4): 799.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends
    Caesar Ferrari, Micheal Tadros
    Gastroenterology Insights.2023; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Performed by Gastroenterologists: Opportunistic Screening Strategy for Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancers
    Chih-Wei Yang, Yueng-Hsiang Chu, Hsin-Chien Chen, Wei-Chen Huang, Peng-Jen Chen, Wei-Kuo Chang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Redundant Electromagnetic Control of an Endoscopic Magnetic Capsule Driven by Multiple Electromagnets Configuration
    Jayoung Kim, Han-Sol Lee, Manh Cuong Hoang, Seonghwan Jeong, Jae-Seung Kim, Cheong Lee, Byungjeon Kang, Jonghee Lee, Young-Don Son, Seungmin Bang, Eunpyo Choi, Jong-Oh Park, Chang-Sei Kim
    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.2022; 69(11): 11370.     CrossRef
  • Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training
    Hasan Maulahela, Nagita Gianty Annisa, Tiffany Konstantin, Ari Fahrial Syam, Roy Soetikno
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 14(9): 512.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of CYP2C19 polymorphism in Bogotá, Colombia: The first report of allele *17
    Azucena Arévalo-Galvis, William A. Otero-Regino, Gloria N. Ovalle-Celis, Eliana R. Rodríguez-Gómez, Alba A. Trespalacios-Rangel, Jed N. Lampe
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(1): e0245401.     CrossRef
  • Highlights from the 52nd Seminar of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Eun Young Kim, Il Ju Choi, Kwang An Kwon, Ji Kon Ryu, Ki Baik Hahm
    Clinical Endoscopy.2015; 48(4): 269.     CrossRef
  • 19,622 View
  • 510 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of Previous Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery on Colonoscopy
Chang Wook Jeong, M.D., Sang Goon Shim, M.D., Geon Tae Park, M.D., Ji Eun Oh, M.D., Ji Eun Yi, M.D., Jae Gon Woo, M.D., Dae Hyeon Cho, M.D. and Gil Jong Yoo, M.D.
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2011;42(5):283-288.   Published online May 28, 2011
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background/Aims: A number of studies have reported wide variability in the colonoscope insertion time among patients who had prior abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of abdominal surgery on colonoscope insertion time.

Methods: The subjects were 192 patients with prior abdominal surgery, among 3,600 patients who underwent a colonoscopy at Samsung Changwon Hospital from May 2008 to May 2010. We collected the following data: insertion time, age, gender, height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, method of abdominal surgery, and the degree of bowel cleanliness. Previous abdominal operations were divided into colectomy, non-colectomy abdominal surgery, pelvic surgery, and laparoscopic surgery groups.

Results: The average colonoscope insertion time in patients with prior abdominal surgery (7.73±5.95 min) was longer than that of the non-surgery group (6.4±3.88 min). Patients in the colectomy groups were older and had a shorter insertion time (5.11±3.32 min) than patients in the other groups.

Conclusions: Insertion of a colonoscope in patients with previous abdominal surgery was more difficult than that in the control group, except the colectomy group. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2011;42:283-288)

  • 2,813 View
  • 23 Download
Close layer
A Case of Afferent Loop Syndrome after Inserting a Double-Layered Pyloric Stent for Gastric Outlet Obstruction in a Patient with Stump Gastric Cancer after Undergoing Billroth II Radical Subtotal Gastrectomy
Seok Lee, M.D., Yu Jeong Hwang, M.D., Seong Hun Kim, M.D., In Hee Kim, M.D., Sang Wook Kim, M.D., Seung Ok Lee, M.D., Dae Ghon Kim, M.D. and Soo Teik Lee, M.D.
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2009;38(3):147-150.   Published online March 30, 2009
AbstractAbstract PDF
Stent insertion is an effective method for treating a patient with gastric outlet obstruction that's caused by recurred cancer at the anastomosis site. There are some complications associated with stent insertion, such as perforation, bleeding, ulceration and obstruction. There are only rare Korean case reports of afferent loop syndrome after stent insertion. We report here on a case of afferent loop syndrome that occurred after insertion of a double-layered pyloric stent for gastric outlet obstruction in a patient with stump gastric cancer after undergoing Billroth II radical subtotal gastrectomy.(Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2009;38:147-150)
  • 2,346 View
  • 11 Download
Close layer
The Effect of Self-Expanding Metallic Stent Insertion for the Treatment ofMalignant Colorectal Obstruction
Kee Myung Lee, M.D., Tae Il Kim, M.D.*, Bong Min Ko, M.D., Sung Jae Shin, M.D., Won Ho Kim, M.D.*, Jin Hong Kim, M.D., Moon Sung Lee, M.D., Hyun Soo Kim, M.D., Young Soo Park, M.D.§, Ka
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2008;36(5):274-281.   Published online May 30, 2008
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of the use of stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction as compared with performing emergency surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 201 patients. Malignant colorectal obstructions caused by a resectable tumor were treated with preoperative stenting followed by surgery (group A, n=55) or emergency surgery (group B, n=59). Malignant obstructions caused by an unresectable cancer were treated with palliative stenting (group C, n=58) or palliative emergency surgery (group D, n=29). Results: The one-staged radical resection rate was significantly higher in group A patients than in group B patients (87.3% vs. 52.5%, p<0.05). Post-operative complications were more frequent in group A patients than in group B patients (9.1% vs. 32.2%, p<0.05). The admission period was significantly shorter for group A patients than for group B patients (25.0 days vs. 33.7 days, p<0.05). The medical cost was not different for group A and group B patients. Life-long stoma formation was necessary for 15.5% of group C patients and 69% of group D patients, respectively. The admission period was significantly shorter for group C patients than group D patients (10.5 days vs. 22.7 days, p<0.05). The medical cost was not different for group C and D patients. Conclusions: Stent insertion was an effective treatment modality for malignant colorectal obstruction. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2008;36:274- 281)
  • 3,034 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
증례 : 유두부로 개구하는 담낭관 급성 췌장염 - 증례보고 - ( Cystic Duct Insertion at the Ampulla of Vater and Acute Pancreatitis - A Case Report - )
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2000;20(6):496-498.   Published online November 30, 1999
AbstractAbstract PDF
The two most common causes of acute pancreatitis are alcohol and cholelithiasis. Acute recurrent pancreatitis can result from a variety of abnormalities involving the terminal end of the distal choledochus, pancreatic duct, ampulla of Vater and the major duodenal papilla, which in turn may include a papillary stenosis, periampullary neoplasm, choledochocele, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Recently a case of recurrent acute pancreatitis associated with aberrant cystic duet insertion at the ampulla of Vater was experienced. Biliary-pancreatic reflux was speculated to be the mechanism responsible for causing this anomalous, recurrent, acute pancreatitis. Another case of acute pancreatitis associated with aberrant cystic duct insertion at the ampulla of Vater was also experienced in a 29-year-old man, 1Jnlike the previous report, our case showed cholestatic features on the initial blood chemistry. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancre-atography performed after recovry revealed only aberrant cystic duct insertion at the ampulla of Vater. This anomaly also seems to have played a role in causing acute pancreatitis in this patient. This interesting case is herein reported with a review of the relevant literature. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2000;20:496-498)
  • 2,213 View
  • 7 Download
Close layer
대장내시경검사 시 내시경 삽입 시간에 영향을 미치는 인자 ( Factors Affecting Insertion Time during Colonoscopy )
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1999;19(4):567-573.   Published online November 30, 1998
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
/Aims: The goal of this study was to examine whether certain variables are associated with insertion time during colonoscopy. Methods: A total of 703 consecutive subjects underwent colonoscopy by a single endoscopist from April of 1998 to August of 1998. The insertion time during colonoscopy was checked and the factors that may affect insertion time were analyzed. Results: The indications for colonoscopy were bowel habit change (34.8%), the diagnosis of and follow up for colonic neoplastic disease (31.6%), abdominal pain (22.8%), thin stool caliber (19.2%), hematochezia (16.1%), routine examination (10.7%), inflammatory bowel disease (9.4%), tenesmus (8.8%) and a family history of colonic disease (3.1%). Of 703 subjects, complete colonoscopy was possible in 678 (96.4%). Reasons for incomplete insertion included inadequate bowel cleaning (n=11), pain (n=6), a history of operations (n=3), and others (n=5). Therefore, the adjusted completion rate was 97.9% (678/692). The mean insertion time in complete colonoscopy was 7.07 4.26 min (range; 2∼35 min). Multivariable analysis revealed that inadequacy of bowel preparation was significantly associated with prolonged (>10 min) insertion time (p=0.005), whereas the history of colorectal resection was inversely associated with prolonged insertion time (p=0.010). Conclusions: Among the factors affecting insertion time during colonoscopy, cleanness of the bowels is the only correctable factor. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 19: 567∼573, 1999)
  • 1,830 View
  • 13 Download
Close layer

Close layer
TOP