Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Recommendation"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Perception of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Personnel on Society Recommendations on Personal Protective Equipment, Case Selection, and Scope Cleaning During Covid-19 Pandemic: An International Survey Study
Parit Mekaroonkamol, Kasenee Tiankanon, Rapat Pittayanon, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Fariha Shams, Ghias Un Nabi Tayyab, Julia Massaad, Saurabh Chawla, Stanley Khoo, Siriboon Attasaranya, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Qiang Cai, Thawee Ratanachu-ek, Pradermchai Kongkham, Rungsun Rerknimitr
Clin Endosc 2022;55(2):215-225.   Published online September 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.051
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: The Thai Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published recommendations on safe endoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to assess the practicality and applicability of the recommendations and the perceptions of endoscopy personnel on them.
Methods
A validated questionnaire was sent to 1290 endoscopy personnel globally. Of these, the data of all 330 responders (25.6%) from 15 countries, related to the current recommendations on proper personal protective equipment (PPE), case selection, scope cleaning, and safety perception, were analyzed. Ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between the variables.
Results
Despite an overwhelming agreement with the recommendations on PPE (94.5%) and case selection (95.5%), their practicality and applicability on PPE recommendations and case selection were significantly lower (p=0.001, p=0.047, p<0.001, and p=0.032, respectively). Factors that were associated with lower sense of safety in endoscopy units were younger age (p=0.004), less working experience (p=0.008), in-training status (p=0.04), and higher national prevalence of COVID-19 (p=0.003). High prevalent countries also had more difficulty implementing the guidelines (p<0.001) and they considered the PPE recommendations less practical and showed lower agreement with them (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively). A higher number of in-hospital COVID-19 patients was associated with less agreement with PPE recommendations (p=0.039).
Conclusions
Using appropriate PPE and case selection in endoscopic practice during a pandemic remains a challenge. Resource availability and local prevalence are critical factors influencing the adoption of the current guidelines.
  • 9,917 View
  • 260 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
Close layer
Review
Evidence-Based Recommendations on Colorectal Stenting: A Report from the Stent Study Group of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Kwang Jae Lee, Sang Woo Kim, Tae Il Kim, Jong-Hoon Lee, Bo-In Lee, Bora Keum, Dae Young Cheung, Chang Heon Yang, The Stent Study Group of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Clin Endosc 2013;46(4):355-367.   Published online July 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.355
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Recently, placement of self-expandable metallic stents has been used for the treatment of colorectal obstruction. As domestic awareness of colorectal cancer has increased, the number of colorectal stenting procedures performed has also increased. We aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for colorectal stenting to aid gastroenterologists in making informed decisions regarding the management of patients who present with colorectal obstruction. The working group consisted of eight gastroenterologists who actively practice and conduct research in the field of colorectal stenting and are the members of the Stent Study Group of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, KoreaMed, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant articles published between January 2001 and June 2012. Based on the modified Delphi process, 10 recommendation statements regarding indications, usefulness, methodology and complications of colorectal stenting, and alternative treatments for malignant colorectal obstruction were determined. The contents will be widely distributed, and periodically revised to reflect the latest knowledge. These evidence-based recommendations for colorectal stenting will provide gastroenterologists and patients with appropriate and balanced information, and will improve the quality of care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Influence of Polymer Composition on the Controlled Release of Docetaxel: A Comparison of Non-Degradable Polymer Films for Oesophageal Drug-Eluting Stents
    Paris Fouladian, Franklin Afinjuomo, Mohammad Arafat, Amanda Bergamin, Yunmei Song, Anton Blencowe, Sanjay Garg
    Pharmaceutics.2020; 12(5): 444.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic stenting for malignant tumors in the area of the bauginium fl ap
    A. S. Vodoleev, M. S. Burdyukov, S. S. Pirogov, E. S. Karpova, D. G. Sukhin, I. B. Perfiliev, V. V. Veselov, A. D. Kaprin
    Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 174(5): 78.     CrossRef
  • Development and In Vitro Evaluation of 5-Fluorouracil-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer-Related Obstruction
    Mohammad Arafat, Paris Fouladian, Anthony Wignall, Yunmei Song, Ankit Parikh, Hugo Albrecht, Clive A. Prestidge, Sanjay Garg, Anton Blencowe
    Pharmaceutics.2020; 13(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Optimal management of malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction: do international guidelines agree?
    Peter John Webster, Joanna Aldoori, Dermot Anthony Burke
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Drug-eluting non-vascular stents for localised drug targeting in obstructive gastrointestinal cancers
    Mohammad Arafat, Paris Fouladian, Anton Blencowe, Hugo Albrecht, Yunmei Song, Sanjay Garg
    Journal of Controlled Release.2019; 308: 209.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative colonic stentsvsemergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Meta-analysis with systematic review of the literature
    Belinda De Simone, Fausto Catena, Federico Coccolini, Salomone Di Saverio, Massimo Sartelli, Arianna Heyer, Nicola De Angelis, Gian Luigi De Angelis, Luca Ansaloni
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis.2017; 5(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Management of Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing a Colonic Stenting
    Bejo Utomo, Carmen Alvarez, Ricardo F. Baldonedo
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2017; 40(5): 342.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based Clinical Management of Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction
    Takaya Shimura, Takashi Joh
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2016; 50(4): 273.     CrossRef
  • Colonic perforation either during or after stent insertion as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction increases the risk of peritoneal seeding
    Su Jin Kim, Hyung Wook Kim, Su Bum Park, Dae Hwan Kang, Cheol Woong Choi, Byeong Jun Song, Joung Boom Hong, Dong Jun Kim, Byung Soo Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(12): 3499.     CrossRef
  • Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes
    Tian-Zhi Lim, Dedrick Chan, Ker-Kan Tan
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(10): 1267.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic stenting for recurrence-related colorectal anastomotic site obstruction: Preliminary experience
    Jung Ho Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 20(38): 13936.     CrossRef
  • 10,730 View
  • 114 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP