CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Twenty-Second versus Sixty-Second Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Small Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Byoung Wook Bang, Tae Hoon Lee, Tae Jun Song, Joung-Ho Han, Hyun Jong Choi, Jong Ho Moon, Chang-Il Kwon, Seok Jeong
Clin Endosc 2015;48(1):59-65.   Published online 2015 January 31    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.59

Excel Download

Twenty-Second versus Sixty-Second Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for the Treatment of Small Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Clinical Endoscopy. 2015;48(1):59   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Su1641 20-Second Versus 60-Second Dilation Duration in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Treatment of Small Bile Duct Stones: Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2014;79(5):AB349   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comment to “Sixty- versus thirty-seconds papillary balloon dilation after sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones: A randomized controlled trial”
Digestive and Liver Disease. 2013;45(8):700   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2004;59(6):614-618   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Author reply: Comment to “Sixty versus thirty seconds papillary balloon dilation after sphincterotomy for the treatment of large bile duct stones: A randomized controlled trial”
Digestive and Liver Disease. 2013;45(8):700-701   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Exam 2: Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones
Gastroenterology. 2013;144(2):e14   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Su1406 Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones Removal: a Comparative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013;77(5):AB313-AB314   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

1059 Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation With Versus Without Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Large Common Bile-Duct Stone: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015;81(5):AB195   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Long-term results of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2001;53(5):AB86   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic papillary regular-balloon dilation for removal of large bile-duct stones
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2013;21(6):405-409   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Clin Endosc has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.