| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
Clin Endosc > Volume 51(6); 2018 > Article
Osawa, Miura, Takezawa, Ino, Khurelbaatar, Sagara, Lefor, and Yamamoto: Linked Color Imaging and Blue Laser Imaging for Upper Gastrointestinal Screening


White light imaging (WLI) may not reveal early upper gastrointestinal cancers. Linked color imaging (LCI) produces bright images in the distant view and is performed for the same screening indications as WLI. LCI and blue laser imaging (BLI) provide excellent visibility of gastric cancers in high color contrast with respect to the surrounding tissue. The characteristic purple and green color of metaplasias on LCI and BLI, respectively, serve to increase the contrast while visualizing gastric cancers regardless of a history of Helicobacter pylori eradication.
LCI facilitates color-based recognition of early gastric cancers of all morphological types, including flat lesions or those in an H. pylori-negative normal background mucosa as well as the diagnosis of inflamed mucosae including erosions. LCI reveals changes in mucosal color before the appearance of morphological changes in various gastric lesions. BLI is superior to LCI in the detection of early esophageal cancers and abnormal findings of microstructure and microvasculature in close-up views of upper gastrointestinal cancers. Excellent images can also be obtained with transnasal endoscopy. Using a combination of these modalities allows one to obtain images useful for establishing a diagnosis. It is important to observe esophageal cancers (brown) using BLI and gastric cancers (orange) surrounded by intestinal metaplasia (purple) and duodenal cancers (orange) by LCI.


It is difficult to differentiate early-stage gastrointestinal cancers from inflamed mucosa using white light imaging (WLI) alone despite the high resolution of endoscopic images. Image-enhanced endoscopy has progressed since the early 2000s and includes narrow band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and i-Scan. The usefulness of these endoscopic methods in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lesions with/without magnification has been discussed. FICE yields bright and high-contrast images of gastrointestinal lesions [1,2]. However, the imaging of irregular microvessels in malignant lesions is insufficient at high magnification. NBI is excellent in demonstrating the irregular microvessels of gastrointestinal cancers at high magnification [3-5]. This technique does have limitations, producing dark images of distant lesions in a large luminal organ such as the stomach and poor visualization of mucosal microstructure on the tumor surface [6], which is not appropriate for screening endoscopy. The advent of new endoscopic systems is expected to resolve these problems. Recently, multilight imaging technology using linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser (light) imaging (BLI) systems (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan) has been developed to resolve the limitations of existing image-enhanced endoscopic modalities. The push of a single button during endoscopy allows one to switch between LCI and BLI. In addition, they facilitate both screening and detailed observations of the gastrointestinal tract because of a longer observable distance than that provided by NBI. LCI and BLI use a simpler procedure than NBI, enabling widespread use of this system [6]. These new endoscopic imaging modalities facilitate new diagnostic approaches in gastrointestinal lesions [7,8].
In this review, we carried out a search of the PubMed database for studies published until July 2018 using the keywords “LCI, linked color imaging, BLI, blue laser imaging, Helicobacter pylori eradication” and identified relevant literature for this review. The references cited in these papers were also checked to complement the search. LCI and BLI are the latest imaging modalities but have only been reported sporadically in the English language literature for their usefulness in identifying upper gastrointestinal lesions, despite an extensive search of existing literature. This review was undertaken to describe the potential applications of LCI and BLI. We review LCI and BLI as well as the present and future status of these imaging modalities and describe their usefulness in clinical practice.


Wavelength and color information in endoscopic systems

The characteristics of LCI, BLI, and WLI are shown in Table 1. The emission intensity at short wavelengths in LCI and BLI is much higher than that in WLI. LCI and BLI clearly depict the mucosal surface including the microstructure because of the high intensity at short wavelengths including 410 nm (blue violet) and 450 nm (blue). Particularly, 410 nm wavelength reflects microstructure and microvasculature in the superficial layer of the mucosa. LCI is obtained from BLI-bright by computerized image processing. Therefore, the emission intensities (in descending order) at this wavelength are the highest with BLI, followed by BLI-bright (LCI) and WLI. Differences in emission intensity largely influence the color and structure seen in mucosal surface images. BLI, with the highest intensity, visualizes the surface pattern with the greatest detail.
BLI and BLI-bright have blue and green color information, while LCI has additional red information. LCI shows mucosal color similar to WLI but interestingly produces more color patterns of the mucosa due to emission intensity at wavelengths different from WLI. The brightness (in descending order) of these modalities is greatest in LCI, followed by WLI, BLI-bright, and BLI. LCI is the brightest and thus most useful when screening for gastrointestinal lesions even at a distant view in a wide-lumen organ such as the stomach.

Color recognition of upper gastrointestinal lesions for screening

LCI and BLI produce several color images and yield detailed information about structure and vessels, neither of which is achieved with ease when using WLI. LCI expands small differences in colors, making them easy to recognize, which may be due to differences in reflectance at short wavelengths from the superficial layer of the mucosa. The reflectance at short wavelengths is different among tissues with various histological changes in the gastrointestinal mucosa [9]. For example, the color of malignant gastric lesions is similar to that of the surrounding mucosa using WLI, but their reflectance at short wavelengths is extremely different. Both LCI and BLI have high emission intensity at short wavelengths, especially 410 nm [7,8], and thus highlight differences in spectral reflectance among tissues with various histological changes in the images produced, leading to high color contrast between those areas resulting in easier recognition of lesions (Table 1).

Selecting LCI or BLI for screening

Laser and LED endoscopy are important for screening and performing detailed examinations of upper gastrointestinal lesions. Image-enhanced endoscopy has not been commonly used for screening, and most endoscopists have little experience using it despite the benefits for patients. One must first decide whether to use LCI or BLI (BLI-bright) to identify lesions when screening. No data have been reported showing a comparison of images from LCI and BLI, but it is essential to detect cancers more effectively in a short time during endoscopy when screening. If one mode is more effective in screening for esophageal cancers than another mode, it is not necessary to discuss their effectiveness, comparing images from the two modes. Based on our extensive clinical experience to date with upper gastrointestinal lesions, we summarize the use of these modes in Fig. 1.
Detecting early gastric cancers through screening may allow endoscopic resection, thus obviating the need for surgical resection, resulting in improved patient quality of life [10]. LCI is brighter than WLI, and BLI is brighter than NBI [7,8]. LCI produces particularly bright images in a wide-lumen organ such as the stomach and are useful when screening for gastric lesions, whereas BLI-bright and BLI are also useful in displaying mucosal structure and vessels in close-up views inside the stomach. However, endoscopists should be aware that relatively close views using BLI allows screening even in the stomach, especially the antrum, because the images are brighter than that in NBI.
In contrast, the larynx, pharynx, and esophagus all have narrow lumens with squamous cell epithelium [11]. Endoscopic findings for these epithelia are characterized by microvessels on the mucosal surface rather than microstructure. Intrapapillary capillary loops in the superficial mucosa are important in the diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. BLI has higher emission intensity at short wavelengths and is more suitable in the diagnosis of intrapapillary capillary loops in such areas than LCI.

The importance of color to establish a diagnosis

Some characteristic colors of upper gastrointestinal lesions observed on LCI and BLI are shown in Table 1. The apparent color of lesions using these modes can be determined not only with one color but also by mixing two colors in the respective gastrointestinal organ. The advent of bright image-enhanced endoscopy with modalities such as LCI and BLI requires the endoscopist to carefully observe and recognize mucosal colors during screening endoscopy. These colors allow endoscopists to diagnose a variety of lesions, including malignancies, and areas of inflammation because of the high color contrast with surrounding mucosa.
LCI can reveal new colors for gastric intestinal metaplasia, gastric erosions, and malignant lesions [12-14]. Endoscopists need to understand the association between apparent colors and histopathological findings before performing endoscopy using LCI and BLI.


Superiority of BLI in detecting squamous cell carcinoma

In squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, BLI reveals a higher color contrast between brown lesions with intrapapillary capillary loops and the surrounding area in detail [15]. BLI has been used for early recognition of esophageal cancers in screening programs [8,16,17]. BLI images may seem similar to images obtained by NBI; however, there is a great difference in the composition of wavelengths of these two modalities. An NBI image consists of spectral images alone, whereas BLI images are created from both spectral and white light images. The difference in these characteristics may influence brightness, far-field of view [6], depth of focus, and demonstration of microvessels in the esophageal mucosa. BLI is reported to be useful in the recognition of early esophageal cancers as brownish areas and dot-forming vessels without magnification [8]. In addition, the ranking score for detection and mean color difference score of BLI-bright were significantly higher than that of WLI and NBI [17]. Images of early cancer in the mid-portion of the esophagus are compared using WLI, LCI, and BLI in Fig. 2. WLI does not show abnormal features suspicious of malignancy. However, BLI can enable visualization of a brown malignant lesion distinct from the surrounding mucosa, but LCI cannot. Although experience using image-enhanced endoscopy is not yet based on rigorous data, BLI can detect early brown esophageal cancers, but LCI cannot in some cases, suggesting that BLI may be superior to LCI and WLI. Most esophageal cancers have a similar color pattern in BLI during screening. Some endoscopists may prefer to use BLI-bright, which display images of more distant mucosa as well [17]. BLI (BLI-bright) use is strongly recommended in screening for early esophageal cancers with transoral endoscopy and even with transnasal endoscopy. Endoscopists should keep in mind that some early esophageal cancers cannot be detected using LCI or WLI.

Findings in Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma

Existing image-enhanced endoscopy modalities are useful in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus [18]. LCI also improves the visibility of short-segment Barrett’s esophagus compared with WLI, especially for trainees, when evaluated both subjectively and objectively [19]. The extent of Barrett’s esophagus is easily shown on images with high color contrast with the gastric mucosa using LCI and BLI. In addition, BLI facilitates the early detection of synchronous adenocarcinomas in patients with Barrett’s esophagus [16], although data in LCI has not yet been reported.


Early gastric cancer with chronic H. pylori infection

Most gastric cancers occur in the background of chronically inflamed mucosa due to H. pylori infection. The early detection of gastric cancer is difficult in such background mucosa, even for well-trained endoscopists, and early gastric cancers are frequently missed in WLI [20]. Precise diagnosis and growth of these lesions have been well studied because of the development of magnifying and image-enhanced endoscopy. However, the usefulness of image-enhanced endoscopy in the early detection of gastric cancer in the distant view remains unknown to many endoscopists. LCI shows a difference in color between a malignant lesion and the surrounding mucosa, allowing enhanced recognition of early gastric cancers without magnification (Figs. 3-6) [13,14]. Most early gastric cancers are seen as orange-red, orange or orange-white in LCI. Orange-red or orange areas changed from the color similar to the surrounding mucosa in WLI. Orange-white areas changed from discolored mucosa in WLI. The colors of gastric cancer in LCI produce high color contrast with the surrounding purple mucosa.
A few cancers with a more intense red color appear to be purple. These color patterns are important for the early detection of gastric cancers. LCI can detect multiple flat cancers that had been missed by WLI alone [13]. Flat cancers may be surrounded by purple mucosa with high color contrast. Color patterns are useful for metachronous gastric cancers that have been reported following curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer [21]. In addition, it is surprising to detect even quintuple small early gastric cancers using LCI.

Detecting early gastric cancers in areas of intestinal metaplasia

Most gastric cancers develop in areas of background chronic gastritis, especially with intestinal metaplasia (Figs. 3-6). Ash-colored nodular changes are an endoscopic sign of gastric intestinal metaplasia using WLI. However, the sensitivity of endoscopic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia using WLI is lower compared to the sensitivity of histopathological diagnosis [22]. It is difficult to diagnose gastric intestinal metaplasia in areas of chronic gastritis despite the high risk for gastric cancer [7,22-24]. Preliminary data from LCI and BLI show that gastric intestinal metaplasia can be seen as a purple and green mucosa with a patchy distribution on screening examinations, respectively [7,8,25]. These modalities help to identify gastric intestinal metaplasia that occurs in a focal area (Fig. 7) and spreads over a broad area (Fig. 3).
LCI images metaplasia as deep or pale purple mucosa even in the distant view. Endoscopists should be aware that strong color (tone) enhancement (C2–C3) by the processor can produce a deep purple color in areas of gastric intestinal metaplasia, which is recognized with ease. If endoscopists cannot judge whether the mucosal color is pale purple or another color, changing to BLI allows for the recognition of green mucosa, strongly suggestive of intestinal metaplasia [7,8].
Purple and green mucosal areas seen in LCI and BLI are important for the following two reasons, respectively: (1) Early gastric cancer can be detected in a background of intestinal metaplasia with high color contrast. (2) Gastric intestinal metaplasia can be diagnosed in a depressed area with morphological features similar to gastric cancer, ruling out malignancy.
Malignant lesions are surrounded by intestinal metaplasia in most endoscopically resected specimens [7,12-14]. These types of mucosae have been reported to lie adjacent to each other in surgically resected specimens [26-28]. Therefore, a finding of purple mucosa is likely to correspond histologically to intestinal metaplasia. These features may facilitate recognition of early gastric cancers during screening examinations.
Purple mucosae are consistent with areas of green mucosa demonstrated by BLI. BLI can also produce high color contrast between malignant gastric lesions and the surrounding mucosa (Figs. 3-6) [7,8] and is useful in screening for gastric cancers especially in the antrum (Figs. 3, 4). Endoscopists should notice that the volume of the antrum is smaller than that of the gastric body. At close-up and in magnified views, BLI can produce high color contrast between a malignant lesion and the surrounding mucosa and exhibit microstructural and microvascular patterns in detail [7,8]. The degree of color contrast is remarkably different between C1 and C2 using the image processor color (tone) enhancement function (Fig. 4). C2 color enhancement results in strong green enhancement, which appears as deep green mucosa, especially in areas of gastric intestinal metaplasia. In addition, deep green intestinal metaplasia shows a patchy and flat-sheet pattern of distribution in the background mucosa and surrounds gastric cancers (Figs. 3-6) [7,8]. The apparent line of demarcation between a brown malignant lesion and the surrounding green mucosa allows endoscopists to recognize cancers and mark the site precisely before performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for complete resection. Purple and green gastric intestinal metaplasias play an important role in the recognition of early gastric cancers using LCI and BLI, respectively.
It is also important for endoscopists to rule out malignancy and definitively diagnose the inflammatory mucosa. Endoscopists must consider what precedes the establishment of a diagnosis of a gastric lesion-changes in color or morphology. On screening endoscopy, a diagnosis of a gastric lesion is established based, mainly, on the distinctive morphology of a lesion with respect to the surrounding mucosa. However, this method sometimes leads to a misdiagnosis. The spectral reflectance of a malignant lesion differs from that of a benign lesion [9], based on a physiological mechanism that cause a difference in mucosal color. In a recent report, LCI was shown to provide more information to endoscopists, and allows for the differential diagnosis of a lesion based on mucosal color [13,14,29]. This characteristic suggests that LCI may rule out a malignancy based on color even for a morphologically abnormal lesion that looks like a malignancy imaged with WLI. For example, with the image shown in Fig. 8, most endoscopists would diagnose the depressed lesion as suggestive of gastric cancer or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma using WLI. However, LCI shows a relatively homogenous purple mucosa in the entire depressed area, suggesting gastric intestinal metaplasia. All three biopsy specimens revealed intestinal metaplasia. Endoscopists should be aware that the alterations in the mucosal color of lesions precedes changes in morphology in LCI, which may be a new approach to differentiate lesions with abnormal morphology.

Early gastric cancer after H. pylori eradication

Successful H. pylori eradication brings dramatic changes in inflammation and acid-related molecules in the gastric mucosa [22,30,31]. Prophylactic eradication of H. pylori after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer should be performed to prevent the development of metachronous gastric carcinoma [32]. However, gastric cancers may be found in patients who were treated for H. pylori eradication [33,34], and endoscopists may have difficulty in establishing the diagnosis endoscopically. Surprisingly, early gastric cancers may have a surface pattern similar to the pattern of changes noticed with chronic gastritis. This results from a gastritis-like appearance, due to the non-neoplastic epithelium covering the malignant tissue, resulting in an indistinct border or lack of obviously malignant characteristics [35,36]. NBI magnifying endoscopy can demonstrate pattern differences relative to the surrounding non-malignant mucosa, and it is important to detect this difference [36]. However, these findings make it difficult for many endoscopists to diagnose such lesions even with NBI magnifying endoscopy. Endoscopists need a new diagnostic method to make it easier to detect such malignancies.
LCI and BLI have not been discussed in relation to gastric cancer after successful H. pylori eradication. However, early gastric cancers are encountered after successful eradication and have been precisely diagnosed as cancer with an apparent demarcation line using LCI and BLI. Interestingly, the color contrast between early gastric cancers and the surrounding mucosa in H. pylori-eradicated mucosa is similar to what is observed in H. pylori-infected mucosa. In Fig. 6, slightly pale mucosa can be seen along the greater curvature at the gastric angle on WLI. LCI shows orange-red mucosa surrounded by purple mucosa at a distant view. BLI also shows brown mucosa surrounded by green mucosa at a close view. The exact line of demarcation can be determined by examining both images with high color contrast. However, the close-up and magnified views obtained using BLI reveals gastritis-like features on the mucosal surface, with a brown malignant area, similar to that of the surrounding green mucosa. Therefore, the surface pattern features make it difficult to differentiate malignant lesions from changes due to chronic gastritis. Endoscopists should pay attention to the color images obtained by LCI and BLI without magnification, both of which clearly show a difference in the color of the mucosa in malignant and surrounding areas. It is important to understand that color findings may precede morphological findings of malignant lesions when diagnosing them in H. pylori-eradicated mucosa.

Detecting early gastric cancers among erosions or multiple tiny gastric lesions

Gastric lesions appear in various forms and colors in acute and chronically inflamed mucosae. These lesions may appear as mucosal roughness, erosions, plaques, abnormal colors, bumps, or pitting when observed by conventional endoscopy. Image-enhanced endoscopy with magnification may be useful in differentiating such inflamed mucosae from early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions [37]. LCI and BLI have the advantage of showing distinctive findings, making it possible to differentiate these lesions without magnification. The effectiveness of LCI in areas of erosive inflamed mucosa has not been reported. Small regenerative changes in gastric erosions and small gastric cancers have a similar color and morphology when imaged with WLI, and biopsy is often necessary to differentiate them with precision. Endoscopists may not be able to recognize the difference in these lesions using WLI because they are too small to differentiate definitively. However, even such small lesions can be recognized using LCI based on their difference in color. In Fig. 9, two small lesions (Fig. 9A, C) seem to be erosive inflamed mucosae when imaged with WLI. Malignant lesions are characterized by an orange-reddish depressed form (Fig. 9B) and erosive inflamed mucosae by a purple depressed form (Fig. 9D). LCI may be useful in detecting cancer among such small lesions, but a prospective study is warranted to evaluate this conclusively.
It is difficult to detect cancer among multiple depressed lesions of the stomach, which are often encountered in areas of chronic gastritis on screening endoscopy, using WLI alone. A malignant lesion may be hidden in such areas, but until recently, no endoscopic method for detection was available. Chronic gastritis appears in several color patterns in LCI and BLI [7,12-14]. However, LCI has the potential to detect malignant lesion among such lesions, distinct from inflammatory changes. In Fig. 10, at a distant view, the malignant lesion is recognized as orange mucosa, distinct from multiple inflammatory depressed areas of the mucosa, which appear as purple mucosa. Orange-colored lesions could be identified as early gastric cancers, supported by BLI magnification. The ESD specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. On screening, endoscopists should be mindful of the different colors among irregularly shaped areas of the gastric mucosa when using LCI rather than WLI.

Early gastric cancer without H. pylori infection

No data is available regarding the detection of early gastric cancers using LCI and BLI in normal background mucosa that is not infected with H. pylori. However, we have observed the effectiveness of LCI in some patients in the clinical practice. Endoscopists must know whether the color of a cancer is similar to the color of a H. pylori-infected background mucosa. In Fig. 11, an elevated lesion similar to that observed with erosive changes is seen near the pyloric ring in WLI. BLI magnification shows a relatively regular surface pattern in the central portion. However, LCI demonstrates an orange lesion on the surface mucosa, suggesting a malignant lesion. Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Undifferentiated gastric cancer

Magnified BLI reveals irregular and distinctive microvessels, which are present in undifferentiated gastric carcinoma [7,8]. A key fret pattern or “frizzy” vessel is a characteristic feature in an unstructured area [7]. High-resolution images in good focus are greatly useful in diagnosing uneven malignant areas in BLI [8], but no data have been reported regarding the detection of undifferentiated cancers during screening. Endoscopists need to evaluate the images of undifferentiated gastric cancer using LCI without magnification. In Fig. 12, it is difficult to identify malignant lesions using WLI alone. LCI reveals a small orange-reddish lesion on the lesser curvature similar to that observed with a differentiated carcinoma. The surface pattern of most areas seems to be normal. The earliest undifferentiated carcinoma may have a normal surface pattern when viewed without magnification. Magnifying BLI in a slightly depressed area shows irregular microvessels in an unstructured area suspicious for undifferentiated carcinoma. LCI has the potential to detect undifferentiated gastric carcinomas based on their color in the mucosa seen as a suspicious malignant lesion although histology cannot be determined from endoscopic findings without magnification.

Transnasal endoscopy with LCI in detecting early gastric cancer

Small-caliber endoscopy has progressed with improved technology to deliver high-resolution images and is commonly used in Japan to screen for upper gastrointestinal lesions. LCI and BLI have been available with one small-caliber endoscope (e.g., EG-L580NW; Fujifilm Co.) using a laser endoscopic system since 2014 and with one (e.g., EG-740N; Fujifilm Co.) using an LED endoscopy system since 2018. These endoscopes are characterized by a small radius at the tip, which allows observation of upper gastrointestinal lesions with a frontal view [38,39]. A recent report showed that WLI using small-caliber endoscopy did not allow the diagnosis of a small red lesion as cancer, but BLI showed a discolored area around the red lesion with irregular vessels, resulting in the accurate diagnosis of an early case of gastric cancer [39]. Further studies of small-caliber endoscopy are warranted in the future.


Colonoscopic resection of adenomatous polyps reduces the mortality from colorectal cancer because of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence [40,41]. The efficacy of removing sporadic duodenal adenomas is unknown. Duodenal neoplasms are the second leading cause of death in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [42], and therefore, the resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas may be recommended. The use of endoscopic treatment for duodenal neoplasms has been increasing in Japan. ESD has been attempted for complete resection [43,44]. However, this technique is difficult, and recent reports recommend the use of simple and safe endoscopic methods, including underwater resection and cold snare polypectomy [45,46]. Therefore, endoscopists need accurate diagnoses before using these treatments. BLI detects not only vascular and surface patterns of duodenal cancer with magnification, but also the minute white opaque substance of possible fatty deposits on the tumor surface [8]. However, no data have been reported for LCI. Images of duodenal cancer are shown in Fig. 13. LCI shows an orange image in the area where histopathological findings reveal cancer in an adenoma and enhances the white opaque substance in the peripheral areas of the lesion, suggesting only an adenoma. However, some duodenal adenomas may appear to be orange in color. Further studies to characterize the imaging of duodenal neoplasms are necessary.


LCI may allow for a new endoscopic approach to screening, based on the premise that color changes precede morphological changes in the mucosa during visualization of gastric lesions. LCI can detect early gastric cancer in high color contrast with respect to the surrounding mucosa, irrespective of H. pylori status, and helps in the diagnosis of inflamed mucosa including erosions, distinct from cancers, based on color. LCI also shows duodenal cancers as orange-colored. BLI is superior to LCI in the detection of early esophageal cancer and provides microstructural and microvascular images at near and in magnified views. It is important to obtain both types of images alternately to establish a diagnosis.


Conflicts of Interest:Hiroyuki Osawa and Hironori Yamamoto received honoraria from Fujifilm Corporation and Fujifilm Medical Corporation. Other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Fig. 1.
Different applications of linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI, or BLI-bright) in upper gastrointestinal cancer screening. BLI is better for visualizing the regions from the pharynx to lower esophagus. LCI is better for the visualizing the area from the esophagogastric junction (e.g., Barrett’s esophagus) to the duodenum where BLI (or BLI-bright) is also useful at near views.
Fig. 2.
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. (A) White light imaging and (B) linked color imaging do not demonstrate abnormal features suggestive of a malignancy. (C) Blue laser imaging highlights a brown malignant lesion, distinct from the surrounding mucosa. (D) Magnifying blue laser imaging shows irregular intrapapillary capillary loops suggestive of cancer.
Fig. 3.
Early gastric cancer in the antrum where intestinal metaplasia spreads over broad areas. (A) White light imaging does not demonstrate findings suggestive of malignancy. (B) Linked color imaging shows an orange lesion (arrow), suggestive of cancer, surrounded by purple mucosa. (C) Blue laser imaging-bright shows a brown lesion (arrow) surrounded by green mucosa. (D) Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (black line) adjacent to intestinal metaplasia (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Fig. 4.
Comparison between C1 and C2 green enhancement of mucosa surrounding an early gastric cancer. (A) White light imaging shows a slightly discolored lesion. (B) Linked color imaging shows an orange lesion partially surrounded by purple mucosa. In addition, purple areas have a patchy distribution in the background mucosa. (C) Blue laser imaging with C1 color enhancement shows that the purple mucosae demonstrated by linked color imaging have changed to pale green. (D) Blue laser imaging with C2 color enhancement changes the mucosal color to dense green which highlights the apparent line of demarcation between the brown malignant lesion and surrounding mucosa.
Fig. 5.
Early gastric cancer near the cardia. (A) White light imaging shows slightly irregular surface mucosa that has the same color as the surrounding mucosa. (B) Linked color imaging shows an orange lesion surrounded by purple mucosa. (C) Blue laser imaging shows a brown lesion surrounded by green mucosa. (D) Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (black line) adjacent to intestinal metaplasia (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Fig. 6.
Early gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication. (A) White light imaging shows a slightly irregular lesion on the greater curvature. (B) Linked color imaging shows an orange lesion surrounded by purple mucosa. In addition, purple areas have patchy and flat-sheet distributions in the background mucosa. Blue laser imaging (C) at close and (D) magnified views shows a brown lesion surrounded by green mucosa. However, the surface patterns are similar in the brown malignant lesion and the surrounding mucosa because this malignant lesion occurred after H. pylori eradication.
Fig. 7.
Intestinal metaplasia near the pyloric ring. (A) White light imaging does not demonstrate abnormal features. (B) Linked color imaging shows purple mucosa near the pyloric ring. (C) Blue laser imaging-bright and (D) blue laser imaging visualize a green lesion, suggesting intestinal metaplasia.
Fig. 8.
Gastric intestinal metaplasia. (A) White light imaging shows an irregular depressed lesion, suggesting advanced gastric cancer or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma on the greater curvature. However, (B) linked color imaging shows a purple lesion homogenously spreading in the depressed area, suggesting intestinal metaplasia. (C) Blue laser imaging shows a regular surface pattern with green circle lines corresponding to the marginal crypt epithelium, suggesting intestinal metaplasia. (D) Pathological evaluation of the biopsy specimen shows intestinal metaplasia (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Fig. 9.
Differentiating gastric cancer and an erosion by linked color imaging. The erosion is observed in the antrum by (A) white light imaging and changes to (B) orange-reddish mucosa using linked color imaging, suggesting cancer. Similarly, an erosion is observed in the antrum by (C) white light imaging but changes to (D) purple mucosa using linked color imaging, suggesting inflamed mucosa.
Fig. 10.
Detection of gastric cancer among multiple depressed lesions by linked color imaging. (A) White light imaging shows multiple depressed lesions in the gastric body. (B) Linked color imaging shows many depressed purple lesions suspicious for inflamed mucosa such as intestinal metaplasia and only one orange lesion suspicious for cancer (central portion of the image). (C) The orange lesion changes to brown with an irregular surface pattern surrounded by green mucosa using blue laser imaging, suggesting cancer. (D) Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (black line) adjacent to intestinal metaplasia (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Fig. 11.
Early gastric cancer in normal background mucosa not infected with Helicobacter pylori using linked color imaging. (A) White light imaging shows an elevated lesion near the pyloric ring. (B) Blue laser imaging at low magnification shows a relatively regular surface pattern in the central portion. However, (C) linked color imaging shows an orange lesion on the mucosal surface, suggestive of cancer. (D) Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (black line) (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Fig. 12.
Diagnosis of undifferentiated gastric carcinoma by linked color imaging and blue laser imaging. (A) It is difficult to identify malignant lesions using white light imaging. (B) Linked color imaging demonstrates a small orange-reddish lesion with a normal surface pattern. (C) Blue laser imaging shows a brown lesion with an irregular surface pattern surrounded by green mucosa. (D) Magnifying blue laser imaging shows irregular microvessels in an unstructured area suggesting undifferentiated carcinoma.
Fig. 13.
Imaging of early duodenal cancer and multiple adenomas in the descending portion of the duodenum using linked color imaging. (A) White light imaging shows an elevated lesion in the descending portion, which accompanies a central red area and peripheral white area. (B) Linked color imaging shows an orange main lesion in the central area, suggesting cancer, and two enhanced white lesions in the satellite areas, suggesting adenoma (white arrows). (C) Blue laser imaging of the main lesion shows a brown lesion in the central area, suggesting cancer. (D) Pathological evaluation of the resected specimen shows well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (black line) in the elevated portion of the main lesion (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40).
Table 1.
Comparison of Blue Laser Imaging, Linked Color Imaging and White Light Imaging
Blue laser imaging Linked color imaging White light imaging
Color information Blue Green Blue Green Red Blue Green Red
Intensity at 410 nm (Violet blue) Highest High Weak
Brightness Slightly dark Brightest Bright
Visibility of structures and vasculature Most clearly observed Clearly observed Not clearly
Color enhancement recommended C1: Pharynx~Esophagus C2: Stomach~Duodenum C2 or C3
Distant, Close-up and Magnified view Close-up view Distant view
Magnified view Close-up view
Normal mucosa
 Esophagus Green vessels Purple vessels Vermilion vessels
 Stomach Brown Light orange Coral
 Duodenum Brown Light orange Coral
Intestinal metaplasia Green Purple Ash
 Pharynx, Larynx Brown
 Esophagus Brown and others Red violet and others Red and others
 Stomach Brown and others Orange-red and others Red, discolored
 Duodenum Brown and others Orange-red and others Red, discolored

C1, color enhancement (tone) level 1; C2, color enhancement (tone) level 2; C3, color enhancement (tone) level 3.


1. Osawa H, Yoshizawa M, Yamamoto H, et al. Optimal band imaging system can facilitate detection of changes in depressed-type early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:226-234.
crossref pmid
2. Yoshizawa M, Osawa H, Yamamoto H, et al. Diagnosis of elevated-type early gastric cancers by the optimal band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:19-28.
crossref pmid
3. Yao K, Oishi T, Matsui T, Yao T, Iwashita A. Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture in intramucosal gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:279-284.
crossref pmid
4. Nakayoshi T, Tajiri H, Matsuda K, Kaise M, Ikegami M, Sasaki H. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging system for early gastric cancer: correlation of vascular pattern with histopathology (including video). Endoscopy 2004;36:1080-1084.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Kaise M, Kato M, Urashima M, et al. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of superficial depressed gastric lesions. Endoscopy 2009;41:310-315.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Kaneko K, Oono Y, Yano T, et al. Effect of novel bright image enhanced endoscopy using blue laser imaging (BLI). Endosc Int Open 2014;2:E212-E219.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Osawa H, Yamamoto H. Present and future status of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and blue laser imaging technology. Dig Endosc 2014;26 Suppl 1:105-115.
crossref pmid
8. Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Miura Y, et al. Blue laser imaging provides excellent endoscopic images of upper gastrointestinal lesions. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 2014;1:607-610.
9. Mouri R, Yoshida S, Tanaka S, Oka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K. Evaluation and validation of computed virtual chromoendoscopy in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1052-1058.
crossref pmid
10. Ono H. Early gastric cancer: diagnosis, pathology, treatment techniques and treatment outcomes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:863-866.
crossref pmid
11. Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T, et al. Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1566-1572.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Ono S, Abiko S, Kato M. Linked color imaging enhances gastric cancer in gastric intestinal metaplasia. Dig Endosc 2017;29:230-231.
crossref pmid
13. Fukuda H, Miura Y, Hayashi Y, et al. Linked color imaging technology facilitates early detection of flat gastric cancers. Clin J Gastroenterol 2015;8:385-389.
crossref pmid
14. Kanzaki H, Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, et al. Linked color imaging (LCI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technology, emphasizes the color of early gastric cancer. Endosc Int Open 2017;5:E1005-E1013.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Diao W, Huang X, Shen L, Zeng Z. Diagnostic ability of blue laser imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy for early esophageal cancer. Dig Liver Dis 2018;50:1035-1040.
crossref pmid
16. Iwashita C, Miura Y, Osawa H, et al. Laser imaging facilitates early detection of synchronous adenocarcinomas in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Endosc 2017;50:81-86.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Tomie A, Dohi O, Yagi N, et al. Blue laser imaging-bright improves endoscopic recognition of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016;2016:6140854.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Osawa H, Yamamoto H, Yamada N, et al. Diagnosis of endoscopic Barrett’s esophagus by transnasal flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. J Gastroenterol 2009;44:1125-1132.
crossref pmid
19. Takeda T, Nagahara A, Ishizuka K, et al. Improved visibility of Barrett’s esophagus with linked color imaging: inter- and intra-rater reliability and quantitative analysis. Digestion 2018;97:183-194.
crossref pmid
20. Raftopoulos SC, Segarajasingam DS, Burke V, Ee HC, Yusoff IF. A cohort study of missed and new cancers after esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1292-1297.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Abe S, Oda I, Minagawa T, et al. Metachronous gastric cancer following curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Clin Endosc 2018;51:253-259.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Kaminishi M, Yamaguchi H, Nomura S, et al. Endoscopic classification of chronic gastritis based on a pilot study by the research society for gastritis. Dig Endosc 2002;14:138-151.
23. Eda A, Osawa H, Yanaka I, et al. Expression of homeobox gene CDX2 precedes that of CDX1 during the progression of intestinal metaplasia. J Gastroenterol 2002;37:94-100.
crossref pmid
24. Osawa H, Inoue F, Yoshida Y. Inverse relation of serum Helicobacter pylori antibody titres and extent of intestinal metaplasia. J Clin Pathol 1996;49:112-115.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Chen H, Liu Y, Lu Y, et al. Ability of blue laser imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Lasers Med Sci 2018;33:1757-1762.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Nakamura K, Sugano H, Takagi K. Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances. Gan 1968;59:251-258.
27. Matsukura N, Suzuki K, Kawachi T, et al. Distribution of marker enzymes and mucin in intestinal metaplasia in human stomach and relation to complete and incomplete types of intestinal metaplasia to minute gastric carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;65:231-240.
28. Kohli Y, Pfeiffer CJ, Kutty KP, Barrowman JA, Heughan C, Kepkay DL. Endoscopic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia in Canada and Japan. J Clin Gastroenterol 1981;3 Suppl 1:29-33.
crossref pmid
29. Yoshifuku Y, Sanomura Y, Oka S, et al. Evaluation of the visibility of early gastric cancer using linked color imaging and blue laser imaging. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17:150.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Osawa H, Nakazato M, Date Y, et al. Impaired production of gastric ghrelin in chronic gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:10-16.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Osawa H, Kita H, Ohnishi H, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication induces marked increase in H+/K+-adenosine triphosphatase expression without altering parietal cell number in human gastric mucosa. Gut 2006;55:152-157.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Fukase K, Kato M, Kikuchi S, et al. Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:392-397.
crossref pmid
33. Kamada T, Hata J, Sugiu K, et al. Clinical features of gastric cancer discovered after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori: results from a 9-year prospective follow-up study in Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:1121-1126.
crossref pmid
34. Kobayashi M, Hashimoto S, Nishikura K, et al. Magnifying narrow-band imaging of surface maturation in early differentiated-type gastric cancers after Helicobacter pylori eradication. J Gastroenterol 2013;48:1332-1342.
crossref pmid
35. Ito M, Tanaka S, Takata S, et al. Morphological changes in human gastric tumours after eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori in a shortterm follow-up. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:559-566.
crossref pmid
36. Saka A, Yagi K, Nimura S. Endoscopic and histological features of gastric cancers after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Gastric Cancer 2016;19:524-530.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Shi J, Jin N, Li Y, Wei S, Xu L. Clinical study of autofluorescence imaging combined with narrow band imaging in diagnosing early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. J BUON 2015;20:1215-1222.
38. Toma S, Osawa H, Yoshizawa M, et al. Diagnosis of small flat early gastric cancer by flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. Clin J Gastroenterol 2010;3:88-91.
crossref pmid
39. Takahashi H, Miura Y, Osawa H, et al. Blue laser imaging with a small-caliber endoscope facilitates detection of early gastric cancer. Clin Endosc 2018 Aug 14;[Epub]. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.100.
crossref pdf
40. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-696.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death. Gastroenterology 2017;153:98-105.
crossref pmid
42. Johnson JC, DiSario JA, Grady WM. Surveillance and treatment of periampullary and duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2004;7:79-89.
crossref pmid
43. Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2009;21:270-274.
crossref pmid
44. Miura Y, Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method. Endoscopy 2017;49:8-14.
crossref pmid pdf
45. Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, Bhat YM, Kane SD. “Underwater” EMR of sporadic laterally spreading nonampullary duodenal adenomas (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013;78:496-502.
crossref pmid
46. Hamada K, Takeuchi Y, Ishikawa H, et al. Safety of cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective exploratory study. Endoscopy 2018;50:511-517.
Editorial Office
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#817, 156 Yanghwa-ro(LG Palace, Donggyo-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04050, Korea
TEL: +82-2-335-1552   FAX: +82-2-335-2690    E-mail: ksge@gie.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.