Abstract

Background
Conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy with papillotome(CES) is an established method of management for patients with biliary obstruction from various causes. However, an alternative treatment to CES must be considered when antecedent cholangiagraphy is unsuccessful or when cannulatian with the conventional papillotome fails. The needle-knife papillotomy(NKP) is one of the alternative methods to CES. Recently, it has been suggested that NKP can be used to achieve diagnostic cholangiography. But NKP is controversial because results from studies assessing its efficacy and safety are conflicting. The current study was undertaken to assess retrospectively the efficacy and safety of NKP and CES. Methods: All enrolled patients(CES group 113, NKP group 105) underwent ERCP between September 1993 and August 1996 at Korea Univeisity Guro Hospital. NKP for cannulation was used only when biliary tract disease was suspected but deep canulation failed inspite of several attempts. The efficacy and safety of NKP and CES were evaluated according to the rate of success of performing purposes(removal of common bile duct stones, inser tion of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage or endoprosthesis, treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and cannulation) and complications(bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis). (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 17: 380-389, 1997) (continue)

• Keywords: Needle - knife papiliotomy , Efficacy , Safety , Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography , Endoscopic sphincterotomy