Korean J Gastrointest Endosc > Volume 37(3); 2008 > Article
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008;37(3): 179-184.
내시경 점막절제술 후 발생한 의인성 궤양치료와 지연출혈 예방을 위한 Famotidine과 Pantoprazole의 효과 비교
황호인ㆍ박창환ㆍ염상민ㆍ이석ㆍ이완식ㆍ김현수ㆍ최성규ㆍ유종선
전남대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
Famotidine versus Pantoprazole for the Prevention of Delayed Bleeding and Healing of Iatrogenic Ulcers after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Ho In Hwang, M.D., Chang Hwan Park, M.D., Sang Min Yum, M.D., Seok Lee, M.D., Wan Sik Lee, M.D., Hyun Soo Kim, M.D., Sung Kyu Choi, M.D. and Jong Sun Rew, M.D.
Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
Abstract

Background/Aims:
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) currently serves as the minimally invasive treatment of choice for early gastric cancer and premalignant lesions of the stomach. There have been few studies addressing whether a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine 2-receptor antagonist is the most effective treatment for iatrogenic ulcers after EMR. We compared the effectiveness of pantoprazole and famotidine in treating iatrogenic ulcers and preventing bleeding after EMR without endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Methods:
Between March 2006 and April 2007, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of famotidine (40 mg/day) and pantoprazole (40 mg/day) on the healing of iatrogenic ulcers and control of bleeding after EMR.
Results:
During the study period, 126 patients underwent EMR. Eighty-one received famotidine, and 45 received pantoprazole. The mean duration of drug therapy was 44 days in each group. The stages of ulcers at 1 to 3 months after EMR were mostly scar stage, and there was no specific difference between the groups. Delayed bleeding was seen after EMR in one patient (1.2%) from the famotidine group and in one patient (2.2%) from the pantoprazole group. There were no other major complications after EMR.
Conclusions:
Famotidine was no different than pantoprazole in its effectiveness toward preventing delayed bleeding and promoting healing of iatrogenic ulcers after EMR. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 37:179-184)
Key Words: Endoscopic mucosal resection, Famotidine, Pantoprazole
주요어: 내시경 점막절제술, Famotidine, Pantoprazole
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
CrossRef TDM  CrossRef TDM
  E-Mail
Share:      
METRICS
1,227
View
10
Download
Related articles
Endoscopic Suturing for the Prevention and Treatment of Complications Associated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Duodenal Adenomas  
Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Healing of Ulcers after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection  2019 September;52(5)
Usefulness of the Forrest Classification to Predict Artificial Ulcer Rebleeding during Second-Look Endoscopy after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection  2016 May;49(3)
Preventing and Controlling Bleeding in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection  2013 September;46(5)
Editorial Office
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#817, 156 Yanghwa-ro(LG Palace, Donggyo-dong), Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04050, Korea
TEL: +82-2-335-1552   FAX: +82-2-335-2690    E-mail: ce@kams.or.kr
Copyright © Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer