Esophageal Stent for Cervical Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction

Chan Sup Shim

doi:10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.235

Abstract

Tumors in the cervical portion of the esophagus have traditionally been more difficult to manage. The implantation in the cervical esophagus is a technically demanding procedure. The implantation of modified self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) was very effective perorally under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Experience with SEMS has revealed an increased risk of migration when either covered stents are used or a stent is implanted across the gastroesophageal junction. The modified, covered, esophageal stents appear to prevent stent migration and improve dysphagia in patients with malignant tumor stenosis at the esophagogastric junction. Besides heartburn, regurgitation is sometimes very distressing to patients and may lead to fatal aspiration due to reflux after stenting in esophagogastric junction. These symptoms can be reduced by the use of valved stent. The long S-shape valve is very effective in preventing acid reflux and valve inversion.

Keywords: Antimigration stent; Antireflux stent; Cervical esophageal stent

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic endoprosthesis has been well established as a fast and durable procedure for palliation of malignant dysphagia. An ideal esophageal endoprosthesis should have the following characteristics: an optimal internal diameter, flexible and non-traumatic but sufficient radial force, a compact and easy-to-use delivery system, ability to reposition or remove if necessary, and long-term patency without ingrowth or migration.1 Currently, stent selection should be individualized on the basis of operator preference and experience, proximal or distal tumor location, presence of fistulas, degree of tumor shelf, and whether obstruction is intrinsic or extrinsic.

ESOPHAGEAL STENTING FOR CERVICAL ESOPHAGUS

Tumors in the cervical portion of the esophagus (7% to 10% of all esophageal cancer) have traditionally been more difficult to manage. Palliative resection, radiotherapy, and laser therapy are frequently associated with local treatment failure. The use of esophageal stents in this area was considered to be relatively contraindicated because of concerns about an increased risk of perforation, pulmonary aspiration, migration of the prosthesis into hypopharynx, and perhaps most importantly, an intolerable foreign body sensation.

Today, there is no doubt that the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is a well-established palliative treatment for stenotic malignant disease of esophagus. However, their implantation in the cervical esophagus is a technically demanding procedure and only a few successful cases are reported in the literature. Macdonald et al.2 reported 22 patients treated for malignant stricture of cervical esophagus using SEMS. They reported 93% of technical success but 28% of patient reported foreign body sensation.

We modified the SEMS for cervical esophageal cancer stenting. In order to decrease the foreign body sensation and to prevent migration of the stent, we reduced the length of its proximal funnel to 7 mm with fully expanded diameter of 18 mm (Fig. 1). We had experience in six patients with inoperable cervical esophageal stricture by implantation of modified SEMS inserted perorally under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance (Fig. 2). The placement of the stent was successful in all patients. Five of six patients had no serious complications such as perforation, pulmonary aspiration, stent migration, and foreign body sensation (Table 1).3

ESOPHAGEAL STENTING FOR ESOPHAGOGASTRIC (GE) JUNCTION

Anti-migration stent

Experience with SEMS has revealed an increased risk of migration when either covered stents are used or a stent is implanted across the gastroesophageal junction. Data from several studies evaluating various types of SEMS indicated that the overall migration rate ranges from 2% to 8%, but the migration rate with membrane covered metal stents was higher, presumably due to reduced friction between the membrane and the esophageal wall. The migration rate with these stents ranges from 10% to 35% in reported series.4 Recently, various types of new stents and several methods to prevent stent migration have been tried.

To prevent the migration of the stent, we made a modified, covered, self-expandable esophageal metal stent that could be fixated by using a silk thread attached on the edge of proximal end of the stent to the patient's ear via the nares (Fig. 3).

In our study, no stent migration occurred during the mean follow-up period of 7.5 months (range, 1 to 17) among 61 patients.5 This result is very remarkable and an important point in our study. We think that this modified stent effectively prevented the distal migration.5 In conclusion, modified, covered, esophageal stents appear to prevent stent migration and improve dysphagia in patients with malignant tumor stenosis at the GE junction, a short segment of tumor stricture less than 5 cm in length, a soft tumor stenosis, and a tracheoesophageal fistula.

There was another esophageal stent designed for the prevention of migration by Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea. The Niti-S stent consists of an inner polyurethane layer to prevent tumor ingrowth and an outer uncovered nitinol wire tube to allow the mesh of the stent to embed itself in the esophageal wall (Fig. 4).

Its double-layered design is probably important in preventing migration. However the prevention of stent migration was note complete. The stent migration was 7% (3 of 42 patients).6

Anti-reflux stent

Are the antireflux stents necessary for stenting in gastroesophageal junction? The main criticism was that reflux was rare and could be readily treated by proton pump inhibitors. Also there was no effort to detect symptomatic reflux and underreport of reflux after stenting in GE junction. Besides heartburn, regurgitation is sometimes very distressing to patients and may lead to fatal aspiration. These symptoms can be reduced by the use of valved stent. There were a few attempts to develop antireflux stent.

Dua et al.7 designed the modified self expanding metal esophageal Z-stents to prevent reflux. It was modified by extending the polyurethane coating beyond the lower metal cage so as to form a "windsock"-type valve.

Dua stent was effective in preventing reflux without interfering with ante-grade flow. However it has some limitations such as difficult placement of stent and inversion of antireflux valve under high pressure gradients (e.g., belching, vomiting, and coughing). The FerX-Ella antireflux stent failed to prevent GE reflux due to obstruction by inverted membrane and migration at 7 of 30 cases.8

We evaluated the usefulness of previous antireflux esophageal stent (Dostent; M.I. Tech., Seoul, Korea). It is a fully covered esophageal stent with a tricuspid antireflux valve in a larger distal band. Most patients were relieved of the reflux symptoms, but some of them had an evidence of acid reflux on 24 hours pH monitoring and a reversed or broken valve upon endoscopic examination. So we designed the new model. The modified antireflux stent (Shim's Hanarostent; M.I. Tech.) is a fully covered esophageal stent that has a S-type antireflux valve with long leaflet inside the stent's body, and we fixed the antireflux valve at stent wall in order to minimize acid reflux and to prevent inversion of the valve (Fig. 5). We compared it with conventional SEMSs and Dostent in terms of reflux symptom, dysphagia score and ambulatory 24 hours pH monitoring. The dysphagia score improved significantly with all stents. After ambulatory 24 hours pH monitoring, the newly designed S-type antireflux valve, among the three stents, was found to the best for preventing acid reflux. These modifications do not appear to interfere with the primary function of the stent, that is, relieving dysphagia. From our little experience with the new antireflux valve stents, we believe the long S-shape valve is most effective in preventing acid reflux and valve inversion (Table 2).9

Recently a few skirt type antireflux stents have been introduced on the market (Fig. 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Insertion of stents is virtually always successful, with relatively few complications and excellent palliation of patient's symptoms. It is a field of rapid technological advances, and self-expandable metallic stents have made a significant contribution to the management and palliation of symptoms in a group of patients that has traditionally been proved extremely difficult to treat.