Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia: Initial Results of a Korean Study

Byung Hoo Lee; Kwang Yeun Shim; Su Jin Hong; Gene Hyun Bok; Jun-Hyung Cho; Tae Hee Lee; Joo Young Cho

doi:10.5946/ce.2013.46.2.161

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Clin Endosc > Volume 46(2); 2013 > Article

Original Article Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia: Initial Results of a Korean Study: Byung Hoo Lee¹, Kwang Yeun Shim¹, Su Jin Hong², Gene Hyun Bok¹, Jun-Hyung Cho¹, Tae Hee Lee¹, Joo Young Cho¹; Clinical Endoscopy 2013;46(2):161-167.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.2.161
Published online: March 31, 2013

¹Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

²Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Correspondence: Joo Young Cho. Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 140-743, Korea. Tel: +82-2-709-9581, Fax: +82-2-709-9696, cjy6695@dreamwiz.com

• Received: September 3, 2012 • Revised: October 4, 2012 • Accepted: October 11, 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

11,112 Views
75 Download
52 Crossref
62 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Background/Aims
Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder. Recently, a novel endoscopic technique, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), was introduced as an alternative treatment for achalasia. We report the results and short term outcomes of POEM for patients with achalasia.
Methods
POEM was performed in 13 patients with achalasia. The procedure consisted of creating a submucosal tunnel followed by endoscopic myotomy of circular muscle bundles. The mucosal entry was closed by conventional hemostatic clips. A validated clinical symptom score (Eckardt score) and high resolution manometry were used to evaluate the outcomes.
Results
Both the clinical score of achalasia, as well as the resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, were significantly reduced after POEM. Mean posttreatment Eckardt score was 0.4±0.7, compared to 6.4±1.9 prior to the treatment (p=0.001). The mean pretreatment and posttreatment LES pressure was 30.3 and 15.3 mm Hg, respectively (p=0.007). Following POEM, symptomatic relief from dysphagia without reflux symptoms was observed in all patients (13/13). No serious complications related to POEM were encountered.
Conclusions
Based upon our initial experience, the authors believe that POEM is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment and may possibly substitute established treatments of refractory achalasia.
Keywords: Esophageal achalasia; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; High resolution manometry

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal achalasia is a motility disorder involving failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax in response to swallowing, resulting in aperistalsis of the esophageal body.1 Current treatments include muscle relaxants, endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin, pneumatic balloon dilation, and surgical myotomy.2 These first-line endoscopic treatments of achalasia are limited due to temporary relapse, and complications such as perforation and bleeding.3,4 In addition, surgical myotomy complications include gastroesophageal reflux (GER), stricture formation, and skin scarring.5,6 A potentially less invasive endoscopic method for division of the LES, using a needle-knife to cut the esophageal muscle from the luminal side, was described by Ortega et al.7 in 1980. Efforts to push the boundaries of flexible endoscopy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery led to the development of a novel treatment modality for achalasia. Pasricha et al.8 initially described the feasibility of an endoscopic submucosal esophageal myotomy in a pig model. The first report in humans was by Inoue et al.,9 who coined the term peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), and reported favorable results in 17 achalasia patients, in whom the submucosal route was used to access the muscular layer directly. Complications following POEM were reported by Ren et al.,10 but all complications were reported to be resolved through conservative treatment. We conducted a clinical study and described the technical steps and outcomes of POEM in patients, as a less invasive treatment option for the treatment of achalasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Consecutive patients diagnosed with primary achalasia by high resolution manometry (HRM) were enrolled (Fig. 1). The patients underwent POEM at Soonchunhyang University Hospital in Korea from November 2011 to December 2012. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic achalasia confirmed by contrast fluoroscopy, HRM and esophagoduodenoscopy. The exclusion criteria were active esophagitis, esophageal varices, pregnancy, esophageal stricture, esophageal malignancy, and other coagulopathy. Primary outcome was treatment success defined as symptom relief, based on an Eckardt score ≤3 after treatment.11 Secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events, pre- and post-POEM LES pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), myotomy length, and follow-up periods. The POEM procedure received approval from Institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Hospital (approval number 2010-95, issued on September 29, 2010). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Methods

POEM was performed under general anesthesia. After general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position. A forward-viewing endoscope with an outer diameter of 9.8 mm, which is routinely employed for upper gastrointestinal examination, was used with a transparent distal cap attachment. A Dual Knife (KD-650L; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used to dissect the submucosal layer and to divide circular muscle bundles. Carbon dioxide gas was used for insufflation during the procedure, using a CO2 insufflator. Endoscopic air pressure was controlled by a CO2 insufflation machine (EndoCO2 PRO-500; MIRAEMEDICS, Seongnam, Korea) with a conventional insufflating tube, which maintained insufflation at a constant rate of 2 L per minute. This was used to prevent or decrease subcutaneous emphysema, which can occur when using O₂ gas. For electrosurgery, a VIO 300D electrogenerator (ERBE, Tübingen, Germany) was used. Submucosal injection was performed at the level of the midesophagus, approximately 10 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Approximately 10 mL of saline with 2.5 mL alginate was injected to lift the mucosa and expand the submucosal space, in order to facilitate safe mucosal incision. A 2-cm longitudinal mucosal incision was made on the mucosal surface to create a mucosal entry to the submucosal space using a Dual Knife (ENDO CUT: cut duration 2, cut interval 3, effect 3, Upmax 770 Vp). With the transparent cap attached on the endoscopic tip, we created a submucosal tunnel using the endoscopic submucosal dissection technique. A 2-cm longitudinal incision was performed on the mucosal surface for initiation of an entry point into the submucosal space (Fig. 2A). The tunnel was created ventrally to the 2 cm lower part of the GEJ by a Dual Knife (Fig. 2B). Initial measurement of the GEJ is helpful for optimal orientation. Submucosal tunneling was performed for approximately 12 cm. Upon tunnel completion, we dissected the esophageal circular muscle layer from the esophagus to GEJ at about 2 cm distal to the mucosal entry, approximately 8 cm above the GEJ, by using the Dual Knife and Hook Knife (KD-620LR; Olympus) (SWIFT coagulation: 40 W, effect 3, Upmax 1,210 Vp) (Fig. 2C). Endoscopic myotomy was performed for approximately 10 cm. The circular muscle bundle was cut using Dual Knife and Hook Knife, but the longitudinal muscle bundle was spared (Fig. 2D). The circular layer of muscle was cleanly incised in a distal-to-proximal fashion. Division of the sphincter muscle was continued from the proximal side towards the stomach until the endoscope passed through the narrow segment of the LES (Fig. 2E). When the tip of the endoscope reached the cardia, the submucosal space suddenly became wider. Additionally, changes in muscle structure from clear circular fibers to irregular fibers were also used to identify the cardia. Also, vessels became more irregular and dense at the cardia. After completion of the myotomy, smooth passage of an endoscope through the GEJ with minimal resistance was confirmed by conventional endoluminal endoscopy. After myotomy, the mucosal entry site was closed with seven hemostatic clips (Fig. 2F). At the end of the procedure, the endoscope was again inserted into the natural lumen down to the stomach, to confirm smooth passage through the GEJ. Following POEM the patient was fasted. A clear liquid diet was initiated after normalization of sequential chest X-rays, leukocyte count, and C-reactive protein levels. The mean time unto diet start was 4.4±1.1 days following POEM. Three months after discharge all patients were scheduled to take follow-up symptom score questionnaires, HRM, and esophagography.

Statistical analysis

We used descriptive statistics to report the effectiveness of POEM in patients with achalasia. Mean values between baseline and follow-up were compared using Student's t-test for paired samples. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data were analyzed using commercially available statistical software packages SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

During the study period, POEM was successfully completed in 13 patients with symptomatic achalasia. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the patients. The mean age±standard deviation) was 39.6±15.8 years and the male: female ratio was 3:10. Six patients had received prior treatment for achalasia; balloon dilatation (n=3), botulinum toxin injection (n=2), and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (n=1). On baseline, 11 patients were type 1 achalasia and other patients were type 2 (including 12 nonsigmoid and one sigmoid cases). Endoscopic findings included dilatation of the middle esophagus, and retention of large amounts of foods and water. Resistance of endoscopic passage in GEJ was observed secondary to excessive contraction (Fig. 3A). In the barium swallow study, stenosis was observed in the lower esophagus due to severe contraction of the LES. Additionally, the middle esophagus was dilated in a "bird beak" narrowing appearance, showing retention of barium (Fig. 3B). Barium was excreted slowly into the stomach after 30 minutes. Observed via endoscopic ultrasonography, the inner circular muscle of the lower esophagus demonstrated hypertrophy, with the mean thickest muscle layer measured at 4.0±1.3 mm (normal range, <3). HRM was performed before and after the procedure. According to the manufacturer's data, the normal range for LES pressure with this device is 13 to 43 mm Hg.

The detailed POEM procedure is shown in Fig. 2 and the overall outcome is shown in Table 2. Median submucosal tunnel length was 10.7 cm and median total myotomy length was 8.5 cm (esophageal, 7.0±2.0 cm; gastric, 1.6±0.5 cm). Symptom score follow-up was available for all study patients. Treatment success, as defined by a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3,11 was achieved in 100% of cases. Mean posttreatment Eckardt score was 0.4±0.7, compared to 6.4±1.9 prior to the treatment (p=0.001). Baseline manometry data was available for all study patients. However, manometry follow-up was available in 11/13 cases. The mean LES pressure was 30.3 mm Hg prior to the treatment and 15.3 mm Hg after the treatment (p=0.007). The mean pre- and post-IRP was 26.0 and 10.8 mm Hg, respectively (p=0.008). Two patients refused to undergo follow-up manometry, due to discomfort related to the manometry procedure. A water-soluble esophagogram was obtained after POEM, and there were no incidences of esophageal leakage. Free flow of contrast into the stomach with no retention of barium in the esophagus (Fig. 4A) was observed in all patients. Posttreatment manometry was obtained, where relaxation and passage of LES was seen (Fig. 4B). There were no serious complications related to POEM. During follow-up, no specific complications, problems, or symptoms were encountered.

DISCUSSION

Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus, with an estimated prevalence of 0.5 to 1.0/100,000 population per year.12 It is characterized by dysphagia of solids and liquids. Other features include regurgitation of undigested food, chest pain, weight loss, and respiratory symptoms.13,14 Manometry identifies early disease before esophageal dilatation and food retention are seen. Therefore, it is the most sensitive diagnostic test of esophageal motility, and distinguishes three subtypes of achalasia.15 Findings on esophageal manometry of achalasia include incomplete relaxation of LES on swallowing, absence of esophageal peristalsis, and elevated basal LES pressures.

No known way of preventing or reversing achalasia exists. Therapy is directed at reducing LES pressure to allow gravity and esophageal pressurization to promote esophageal emptying. Peristalsis rarely, if ever, returns. LES pressure can be reduced by pharmacological therapy (calcium channel blockers), forceful dilatation, or surgical myotomy. However, pharmacological therapy provides short-term clinical response with common side effects.16 Botulinum toxin, injected into the LES under endoscopic guidance, inhibits acetylcholine release from nerve endings and improves dysphagia in ~66% of cases, for at least 6 months.17 However, the response is temporary.3 The only durable therapies for achalasia are pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy.18,19 Pneumatic dilatation is an endoscopic technique, using a noncompliant, cylindrical balloon dilator, positioned across the LES, and inflated to a diameter of 3 to 4 cm. Pneumatic dilatation is widely performed because of its relative noninvasiveness, but it has a lower success rate and often causes submucosal microhemorrhages and perforation.4 The most common surgical procedure for achalasia is laparoscopic Heller myotomy, usually performed in conjunction with an antireflux procedure (partial fundoplication).19 The severe complication of both procedures is perforation, with the reported incidence of 1.6% after pneumatic dilatation, versus 0.7% after laparoscopic myotomy.20 Forty-eight percent of patients who had myotomy without a fundoplication suffered from pathologic GER; therefore, myotomy should always be combined with an antireflux procedure.21

POEM is as effective as the current alternative surgery, but requires further evaluation by objective testing. Inoue et al.9 reported a 70% drop in the LES pressure in patients with non-sigmoid esophagus, and a 50% drop in patients with sigmoid esophagus.9 POEM is a permanent procedure, as compared with botulinum toxin injection, so the relapse rate is low. Additionally, this procedure has a lower unexpected perforation risk than that of pneumatic dilatation. POEM resembles Heller's myotomy, but since it is performed endoscopically, selective myotomy over a long distance is possible, vagus nerve injury is prevented, and the operation field is broader than with Heller's myotomy. Additionally, it is less invasive and leaves no scars on the skin.

Our study was performed successfully for the first time in humans in Korea. Our results showed that POEM resulted in a significant decrease in the achalasia symptom score. Both mean LES pressure and IRP were significantly improved in all patients. However, POEM is still in its early stages, and data regarding the long-term results are limited. Therefore, POEM needs long-term follow-up as compared with other treatments. After 2 years of follow-up, laparoscopic Heller's myotomy, as compared with pneumatic dilatation, was not associated with superior rates of therapeutic success.22 Despite laparoscopic Heller's myotomy being an invasive therapy, the treatment follow-up data for both were similar. Thus, POEM follow-up data will be expected. POEM is also indicated in operable young people and refractory achalasia patients who failed to respond to established treatments.

Our study has several limitations. First is the small sample size, with only 13 enrolled patients. Further large scale studies or multicenter studies are required to demonstrate effectiveness of POEM for achalasia patients. However, given the low prevalence of achalasia, multicenter studies in specialized center seems more appealing. Another limitation is that manometry follow-up was not available in all patients. Two patients refused to undergo follow-up manometry, due to discomfort related to the manometry procedure. Finally, our study only included one patient with sigmoid type achalasia. Nevertheless, this study has significance as the first human study in Korea demonstrating the effectiveness of POEM.

In conclusion, POEM seems to be a very effective approach to treat esophageal achalasia. POEM is a less invasive endoscopic procedure for esophageal achalasia, and shows good short-term results without serious complications. Future studies should focus on larger-scale multicenter studies, and long-term results of POEM.

Acknowledgments

We thank the employees of Soonchunhyang University Hospital for their support.

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Achem SR, Crittenden J, Kolts B, Burton L. Long-term clinical and manometric follow-up of patients with nonspecific esophageal motor disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:825–830. 1615935.PubMed
2. Pehlivanov N, Pasricha PJ. Achalasia: botox, dilatation or laparoscopic surgery in 2006. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006;18:799–804. 16918758.Article PubMed
3. Muehldorfer SM, Schneider TH, Hochberger J, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C. Esophageal achalasia: intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin A versus balloon dilation. Endoscopy 1999;31:517–521. 10533734.Article PubMed
4. Karamanolis G, Sgouros S, Karatzias G, et al. Long-term outcome of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:270–274. 15667481.Article PubMed
5. Kilic A, Schuchert MJ, Pennathur A, Gilbert S, Landreneau RJ, Luketich JD. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surgery 2009;146:826–831. 19789044.Article PubMed
6. Eldaif SM, Mutrie CJ, Rutledge WC, et al. The risk of esophageal resection after esophagomyotomy for achalasia. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1558–1562. 19379905.Article PubMed
7. Ortega JA, Madureri V, Perez L. Endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 1980;26:8–10. 7358270.Article PubMed
8. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007;39:761–764. 17703382.Article PubMed
9. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010;42:265–271. 20354937.Article PubMed
10. Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P, et al. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc 2012;26:3267–3272. 22609984.Article PubMed
11. von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:411–417. 22068665.Article PubMed
12. Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson LW. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010;22:e256–e261. 20465592.Article PubMed
13. Hirano I, Tatum RP, Shi G, Sang Q, Joehl RJ, Kahrilas PJ. Manometric heterogeneity in patients with idiopathic achalasia. Gastroenterology 2001;120:789–798. 11231931.Article PubMed
14. Richter JE. Oesophageal motility disorders. Lancet 2001;358:823–828. 11564508.Article PubMed
15. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1526–1533. 18722376.Article PubMed PMC
16. Francis DL, Katzka DA. Achalasia: update on the disease and its treatment. Gastroenterology 2010;139:369–374. 20600038.Article PubMed
17. Annese V, Bassotti G, Coccia G, et al. GISMAD Achalasia Study Group. A multicentre randomised study of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin in patients with oesophageal achalasia. Gut 2000;46:597–600. 10764700.Article PubMed PMC
18. West RL, Hirsch DP, Bartelsman JF, et al. Long term results of pneumatic dilation in achalasia followed for more than 5 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1346–1351. 12094848.Article PubMed
19. Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD, Waring JP. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia. Ann Surg 1997;225:655–664. 9230806.Article PubMed PMC
20. Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2009;249:45–57. 19106675.Article PubMed
21. Richards WO, Torquati A, Holzman MD, et al. Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg 2004;240:405–412. 15319712.Article PubMed PMC
22. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1807–1816. 21561346.Article PubMed

Fig. 1

Esophageal high resolution manometry. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was increased. If swallowing was induced, relaxation of LES was not seen and peristalsis was absent. Type I achalasia exhibited minimal pressurization of the esophageal body.

Fig. 2

(A) A 2-cm longitudinal incision was performed on the mucosal surface for initiation of an entry point into the submucosal space. (B) In the submucosal space, an endoscopic tunnel is created primarily by careful electrocoagulation using a Dual Knife. (C) Endoscopic myotomy was begun 2 cm distal to the mucosal entry using Dual Knife and Hook Knife. (D) After dissection of the circular muscle bundles, outer longitudinal muscle bundles were endoscopically identified. (E) Completion of endoscopic myotomy. Circular muscle bundles were dissected and the 10-cm myotomy was completed. (F) After complete myotomy, the mucosal entry site is closed using standard endoscopic clips.

Fig. 3

(A) Endoscopic findings of achalasia. Note dilatation in the middle esophagus and retention of water in the lower esophagus. (B) Esophagogram. Note achalasia with esophageal dilatation with an air-fluid level, tapering at the esophagogastric junction, providing a "bird beak" narrowing appearance.

Fig. 4

(A) Esophagogram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): barium passed and was excreted quickly through lower esophageal sphincter (LES). (B) High resolution manometry after POEM (3 months later): LES pressure was decreased, and if swallowing was induced, relaxation and passage of LES was seen.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics and Comparison of Patients (n=13)

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Table 2

Clinical Parameters before and after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (n=13)

POD, postoperative day; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure.

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea; ^b)Paired t-test, p=0.001; ^c)Paired t-test, p=0.007; ^d)Paired t-test, p=0.008.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Achalasia: Current therapeutic options
Sebastien Rolland, William Paterson, Robert Bechara
Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
Pietro Familiari, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Rosario Landi, Francesca Mangiola, Ivo Boskoski, Andrea Tringali, Vincenzo Perri, Guido Costamagna
Gut.2023; 72(8): 1442. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) in Achalasia: An Updated Meta-analysis
Afshin Khaiser, Muhammad Baig, David Forcione, Matthew Bechtold, Srinivas R. Puli
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2023; 15(4): 235. CrossRef
Type II achalasia is associated with a comparably favorable outcome following per oral endoscopic myotomy
Yutaka Tomizawa, Nadim Mahmud, Kevin Dasher, Joseph R Triggs, Monica Saumoy, Gary W Falk, Gregory G Ginsberg
Diseases of the Esophagus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Miotomía endoscópica peroral para el tratamiento de acalasia y otros trastornos motores del esófago. Resultados a corto y mediano plazo en un centro de referencia en México
O.V. Hernández-Mondragón, O.M. Solórzano-Pineda, M.A. González-Martínez, J.M. Blancas-Valencia, C. Caballero-Luengas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México.2019; 84(1): 1. CrossRef
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and other esophageal motor disorders: Short-term and medium-term results at a Mexican tertiary care center
O.V. Hernández-Mondragón, O.M. Solórzano-Pineda, M.A. González-Martínez, J.M. Blancas-Valencia, C. Caballero-Luengas
Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition).2019; 84(1): 1. CrossRef
Bridging the Gap between Advancements in the Evolution of Diagnosis and Treatment towards Better Outcomes in Achalasia
Seng-Kee Chuah, Chee-Sang Lim, Chih-Ming Liang, Hung-I Lu, Keng-Liang Wu, Chi-Sin Changchien, Wei-Chen Tai
BioMed Research International.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Preliminary study of 1940 nm thulium laser usage in peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia
J Liu, Y Jiao, Y Niu, L Yu, M Ji, S Zhang
Diseases of the Esophagus.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
POEM in the Treatment of Esophageal Disorders
Nasim Parsa, Mouen A. Khashab
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology.2018; 16(1): 27. CrossRef
Current Status of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
Young Kwan Cho, Seong Hwan Kim
Clinical Endoscopy.2018; 51(1): 13. CrossRef
Safety and efficacy of POEM for treatment of achalasia: a systematic review of the literature
Oscar M. Crespin, Louis W. C. Liu, Ambica Parmar, Timothy D. Jackson, Jemila Hamid, Eran Shlomovitz, Allan Okrainec
Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(5): 2187. CrossRef
Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy
Yuki B. Werner, Daniel von Renteln, Tania Noder, Guido Schachschal, Ulrike W. Denzer, Stefan Groth, Jan F. Nast, Jan F. Kersten, Martin Petzoldt, Gerhard Adam, Oliver Mann, Alessandro Repici, Cesare Hassan, Thomas Rösch
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 85(4): 708. CrossRef
A multicenter international registry of redo per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after failed POEM
Amy Tyberg, Stefan Seewald, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Guadalupe Martinez, Amit P. Desai, Nikhil A. Kumta, Arnon Lambroza, Amrita Sethi, Kevin M. Reavis, Ketisha DeRoche, Monica Gaidhane, Michael Talbot, Payal Saxena, Felipe Zamarripa, Maximilien Barret, Nicholas
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 85(6): 1208. CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia: a retrospective single-center study
H. Guo, H. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. Lv, X. Zou, T. Ling
Diseases of the Esophagus.2017; 30(5): 1. CrossRef
Per-Oral Esophageal Myotomy
Eric S. Hungness, Juaquito M. Jorge
Advances in Surgery.2017; 51(1): 193. CrossRef
Comparison of the Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia According to Manometric Subtype
Won Hee Kim, Joo Young Cho, Weon Jin Ko, Sung Pyo Hong, Ki Baik Hahm, Jun-Hyung Cho, Tae Hee Lee, Su Jin Hong
Gut and Liver.2017; 11(5): 642. CrossRef
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis
K. Patel, N. Abbassi-Ghadi, S. Markar, S. Kumar, P. Jethwa, G. Zaninotto
Diseases of the Esophagus.2016; 29(7): 807. CrossRef
Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: Analysis of clinical, procedural and functional factors, associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis
Pietro Familiari, Santi Greco, Giovanni Gigante, Anna Calì, Ivo Boškoski, Graziano Onder, Vincenzo Perri, Guido Costamagna
Digestive Endoscopy.2016; 28(1): 33. CrossRef
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia
Pietro Familiari, Giovanni Gigante, Michele Marchese, Ivo Boskoski, Andrea Tringali, Vincenzo Perri, Guido Costamagna
Annals of Surgery.2016; 263(1): 82. CrossRef
Surgery or Peroral Esophageal Myotomy for Achalasia
Luigi Marano, Giovanni Pallabazzer, Biagio Solito, Stefano Santi, Alessio Pigazzi, Raffaele De Luca, Francesco Giuseppe Biondo, Alessandro Spaziani, Maurizio Longaroni, Natale Di Martino, Virginia Boccardi, Alberto Patriti
Medicine.2016; 95(10): e3001. CrossRef
Prospective evaluation of CT esophagram findings after peroral endoscopic myotomy
Davinderbir Pannu, Dennis Yang, Patricia L. Abbitt, Peter V. Draganov
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2016; 84(3): 408. CrossRef
Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years
Yuki B Werner, Guido Costamagna, Lee L Swanström, Daniel von Renteln, Pietro Familiari, Ahmed M Sharata, Tania Noder, Guido Schachschal, Jan F Kersten, Thomas Rösch
Gut.2016; 65(6): 899. CrossRef
Double-Scope Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Esophageal Achalasia: The First Trial of a New Double-Scope POEM
Hee Jin Hong, Ga Won Song, Weon Jin Ko, Won Hee Kim, Ki Baik Hahm, Sung Pyo Hong, Joo Young Cho
Clinical Endoscopy.2016; 49(4): 383. CrossRef
Achalasia: from diagnosis to management
Michael F. Vaezi, Valter N. Felix, Roberto Penagini, Aurelio Mauro, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Leonardo Zorrón Cheng Tao Pu, Jan Martínek, Erwin Rieder
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2016; 1381(1): 34. CrossRef
Complications of submucosal endoscopy
Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Alban Benezech, Marc Barthet
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2016; 30(5): 783. CrossRef
Update on the endoscopic treatments for achalasia
Dushant S Uppal, Andrew Y Wang
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(39): 8670. CrossRef
Gestion des complications de l’endoscopie interventionnelle œsophagienne
C. Lorenceau-Savale, G. Rahmi
Acta Endoscopica.2015; 45(3): 90. CrossRef
Greater curvature myotomy is a safe and effective modified technique in per-oral endoscopic myotomy (with videos)
Manabu Onimaru, Haruhiro Inoue, Haruo Ikeda, Chiaki Sato, Hiroki Sato, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Esperanza Grace Santi, Kevin L. Grimes, Hiroaki Ito, Shin-ei Kudo
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 81(6): 1370. CrossRef
Peroral Esophageal Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller's Myotomy for Achalasia: A Meta-analysis
Mingtian Wei, Tinghan Yang, Xuyang Yang, Ziqiang Wang, Zongguang Zhou
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2015; 25(2): 123. CrossRef
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rupjyoti Talukdar, Haruhiro Inoue, D. Nageshwar Reddy
Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(11): 3030. CrossRef
Is Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Effective for the Treatment of Spastic Esophageal Disorders Refractory to Medical Therapy?
Jae Pil Han
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2015; 15(2): 143. CrossRef
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on peroral endoscopic myotomy
Vinay Chandrasekhara, David Desilets, Gary W. Falk, Haruhiro Inoue, John R. Romanelli, Thomas J. Savides, Stavros N. Stavropoulos, Lee L. Swanstrom
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2015; 81(5): 1087. CrossRef
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treating Achalasia and Esophageal Motility Disorders
Young Hoon Youn, Hitomi Minami, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Hyojin Park
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2015; 22(1): 14. CrossRef
Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy on Esoph ageal Motor Function
Su Jin Hong
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2015; 22(1): 1. CrossRef
Achalasia: current treatment options
Pietro Familiari, Santi Greco, Ance Volkanovska, Giovanni Gigante, Anna Cali, Ivo Boškoski, Guido Costamagna
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2015; 9(8): 1101. CrossRef
Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia
Lavinia A Barbieri, Cesare Hassan, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Loredana Correale, Alessandro Repici
United European Gastroenterology Journal.2015; 3(4): 325. CrossRef
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary
Stavros N. Stavropoulos, David J. Desilets, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Christopher J. Gostout, Gregory Haber, Haruhiro Inoue, Michael L. Kochman, Rani Modayil, Thomas Savides, Daniel J. Scott, Lee L. Swanstrom, Melina C. Vassiliou
Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(7): 2005. CrossRef
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia
A. J. Bredenoord, T. Rösch, P. Fockens
Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2014; 26(1): 3. CrossRef
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: Establishing a New Program
Nikhil A. Kumta, Shivani Mehta, Prashant Kedia, Kristen Weaver, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Norio Fukami, Hitomi Minami, Fernando Casas, Monica Gaidhane, Arnon Lambroza, Michel Kahaleh
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(5): 389. CrossRef
Introduction of the per-oral endoscopic myotomy technique to pediatric surgical practice
Stephanie Chao, Michael Russo, Robert Wright, Homero Rivas, James Wall
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2014; 2(6): 313. CrossRef
International Digestive Endoscopy Network 2014: Turnpike to the Future
Eun Young Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Ji Kon Ryu, Ki Baik Hahm
Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(5): 371. CrossRef
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary
Stavros N. Stavropoulos, David J. Desilets, Karl-Hermann Fuchs, Christopher J. Gostout, Gregory Haber, Haruhiro Inoue, Michael L. Kochman, Rani Modayil, Thomas Savides, Daniel J. Scott, Lee L. Swanstrom, Melina C. Vassiliou
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2014; 80(1): 1. CrossRef
Effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: A pilot trial in Chinese Han population with a minimum of one‐year follow‐up
Ting Sheng Ling, Hui Min Guo, Tian Yang, Chun Yan Peng, Xiao Ping Zou, Rui Hua Shi
Journal of Digestive Diseases.2014; 15(7): 352. CrossRef
Jackhammer Esophagus Treated by a Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy
Weon Jin Ko, Byoung Moo Lee, Won Young Park, Jin Nyoung Kim, Jun-Hyung Cho, Tae Hee Lee, Su Jin Hong, Joo Young Cho
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 64(6): 370. CrossRef
Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with failure of prior pneumatic dilation: A prospective case–control study
Tingsheng Ling, Huimin Guo, Xiaoping Zou
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2014; 29(8): 1609. CrossRef
Medical and Endoscopic Management of Achalasia
Jae Pil Han, Su Jin Hong
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2014; 14(2): 82. CrossRef
EndoFLIP system for the intraoperative evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy
Pietro Familiari, Giovanni Gigante, Michele Marchese, Ivo Boskoski, Vincenzo Bove, Andrea Tringali, Vincenzo Perri, Graziano Onder, Guido Costamagna
United European Gastroenterology Journal.2014; 2(2): 77. CrossRef
Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM): Review of Current Techniques and Outcomes (Including Postoperative Reflux)
David Friedel, Rani Modayil, Stavros N. Stavropoulos
Current Surgery Reports.2013; 1(4): 203. CrossRef
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: An Analysis
Dennis Yang, Mihir S. Wagh
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef
Therapeutic flexible endoscopy replacing surgery: Part 3—Peroral esophageal myotomy
Ezra N. Teitelbaum, Eric S. Hungness
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2013; 15(4): 211. CrossRef
Highlights of International Digestive Endoscopy Network 2013
Kwang An Kwon, Il Ju Choi, Eun Young Kim, Seok Ho Dong, Ki Baik Hahm
Clinical Endoscopy.2013; 46(5): 425. CrossRef
Perorale endoskopische Myotomie zur Therapie der Achalasie
B.H.A. von Rahden, J. Filser, S. Reimer, H. Inoue, C.-T. Germer
Der Chirurg.2013;[Epub] CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia: Initial Results of a Korean Study

Clin Endosc. 2013;46(2):161-167. Published online March 31, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.2.161

XML Download

Figure

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia: Initial Results of a Korean Study

Fig. 1 Esophageal high resolution manometry. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was increased. If swallowing was induced, relaxation of LES was not seen and peristalsis was absent. Type I achalasia exhibited minimal pressurization of the esophageal body.

Fig. 2 (A) A 2-cm longitudinal incision was performed on the mucosal surface for initiation of an entry point into the submucosal space. (B) In the submucosal space, an endoscopic tunnel is created primarily by careful electrocoagulation using a Dual Knife. (C) Endoscopic myotomy was begun 2 cm distal to the mucosal entry using Dual Knife and Hook Knife. (D) After dissection of the circular muscle bundles, outer longitudinal muscle bundles were endoscopically identified. (E) Completion of endoscopic myotomy. Circular muscle bundles were dissected and the 10-cm myotomy was completed. (F) After complete myotomy, the mucosal entry site is closed using standard endoscopic clips.

Fig. 3 (A) Endoscopic findings of achalasia. Note dilatation in the middle esophagus and retention of water in the lower esophagus. (B) Esophagogram. Note achalasia with esophageal dilatation with an air-fluid level, tapering at the esophagogastric junction, providing a "bird beak" narrowing appearance.

Fig. 4 (A) Esophagogram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): barium passed and was excreted quickly through lower esophageal sphincter (LES). (B) High resolution manometry after POEM (3 months later): LES pressure was decreased, and if swallowing was induced, relaxation and passage of LES was seen.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia: Initial Results of a Korean Study

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics and Comparison of Patients (n=13)

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Table 2

Clinical Parameters before and after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (n=13)

POD, postoperative day; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure.

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea; ^b)Paired t-test, p=0.001; ^c)Paired t-test, p=0.007; ^d)Paired t-test, p=0.008.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics and Comparison of Patients (n=13)

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Table 2 Clinical Parameters before and after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (n=13)

POD, postoperative day; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure.

^a)Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea; ^b)Paired t-test, p=0.001; ^c)Paired t-test, p=0.007; ^d)Paired t-test, p=0.008.