Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer
Article information
See “Long-Term Survival and Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Superficial Esophageal Cancer after Complete Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection: A Single-Center Case Series” by Ji Wan Lee, Charles J. Cho, Do Hoon Kim, et al., on page [Related article:] 470-477.
The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing, and the disease prognosis is not good [1,2]. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are used for the management of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) [3]. Endoscopic resection can maintain esophageal integrity and avoid morbidity and mortality in esophagectomy. However, endoscopic resection is limited in that it cannot approach lymph node metastases, although lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in esophageal cancer.
Multiple studies have shown that SCCs limited to the epithelial layer (m1) and lamina propria mucosa (m2) without lymphovascular involvement have a low risk of lymph node metastasis [4]. If esophageal lesions are confined to m1 or m2, endoscopic resection may be considered [5,6]. However, if SCCs invade the muscularis mucosa (m3) or the upper 200 μm of the submucosa (sm1), the probability of lymph node metastasis is increased [7]. The Japan Esophageal Society has suggested absolute indications for endoscopic resection of lesions confined to the m1 or m2, and relative indications for endoscopic resection of lesions confined to the m3 or sm1 [8]. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has also recommended endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal SCCs classified as m1 or m2 at very low risk of lymph node metastasis [9]. SCCs that invade deeper than the upper 200 μm of the submucosa carried a high risk of lymph node metastasis and should not be considered for endoscopic resection [7,10].
In a recent Japanese study, the authors reported that during a 3-year follow-up period, the relapse-free survival rates of patients who received (n=26) or did not receive additional treatments (n=17) for superficial esophageal cancer with submucosal invasion were 88% and 64%, respectively, and the result was significantly different (95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.76; p=0.04) [11]. However, they included patients who underwent non-complete resection and had a positive resection margin. In a recent issue of Clinical Endoscopy, Lee et al. analyzed long-term survival and tumor recurrence in patients with superficial esophageal cancer after complete non-curative endoscopic resection [12]. In their study, non-curative resection was defined as the presence of submucosal and/or lymphovascular invasion on endoscopic resection pathology. Patients who were margin positive were excluded from the non-complete resection group. The 5-year overall survival rate was 72.9% in the close observation group (n=10) and 82.1% in the additional treatment group (n=14; p=0.958) [12]. In addition, they reported similar 5-year cumulative incidences of primary esophageal cancer recurrence (10.0% vs. 16.4%, p=0.558) and metachronous esophageal cancer recurrence (16.7% vs. 26.7%, p=0.667) between the two groups [12]. Given these results, the authors concluded that if the esophageal lesion was resected completely, even though it was non-curatively resected, close observation might be an option for patients who are medically unfit to receive additional therapy.
The possibility of lymph node metastasis and tumor recurrence, however, should remain a concern when observing patients with non-curatively resected esophageal cancer. The risk of lymph node metastasis could be increased according to the depth of invasion of esophageal cancer. It increases to up to approximately 20% for lesions invading the m3, up to approximately 40%–50% for lesions invading the sm1, and up to 54% for deeper lesions (sm2) [9]. A recent study that analyzed 43 patients with T1 esophageal SCC reported lymph node metastasis rates and no lymph node metastasis in m1 and m2 esophageal lesions. The lymph node metastasis rates increased according to the depth of invasion [13]. No hematologic recurrence was observed in m1, m2, m3, and sm1 lesions. However, the incidence rate of hematologic recurrence were 9% and 13% in the sm2 and sm3 cases, respectively [13]. They discerned that if the tumor depth was greater than the sm2, patients showed higher rates of lymph node involvement and hematological recurrence, such as liver or lung metastases [13]. Meanwhile, the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 100% in mucosal lesions. However, the survival rates were decreased according to the depth of tumor invasion in submucosal cancer as follows: 90.0% (sm1), 78.8% (sm2), and 68.6% (sm3) [13]. In another study, Yamashina et al. investigated the survival and metastasis rates after endoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma [14]. The 5-year overall survival rates of the patients were decreased according to the depth of tumor invasion as follows: approximately 90% for m1/m2, 71% for m3, and 70% for submucosal cancer (p=0.007) [14]. In a multivariate analysis, the depth of tumor invasion and age were independent factors of survival; the hazard ratio was 3.6 for muscularis mucosal cancer and 3.2 for the submucosal cancer, as compared with m1/m2 cancer, and 1.07 per year of age [14]. The cumulative 5-year metastasis rates were increased according to tumor depth as follows: 0.4% for m1/m2, and approximately 8% for m3, 7% for sm1, and 36% for sm2 (p<0.001) [14]. In a multivariate analysis, the depth of invasion was an independent risk factor of metastasis, and the hazard ratio was 13.1 for muscularis mucosal cancer, 40.2 for SM1, and 196.3 for SM2, as compared with m1/m2 cancer [14].
With non-curative resection of esophageal cancer, no additional treatment has been established yet. However, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can be considered in non-curative resection cases. Kawaguchi et al. reported the pros and cons of ESD in addition to CRT for superficial esophageal cancer treatment [15]. In this study, they divided the enrolled patients to a “CRT after ESD” group (ESD-CRT group) and a CRT-only group (dCRT group). The patients in the ESD-CRT group were defined as those with lesions invading the muscularis mucosa (m3) or submucosal layer (T1b) with vascular invasion. The patients in the dCRT group were defined as those who received definitive CRT only. Sixteen patients were enrolled in the ESDCRT group; and 31, in dCRT group [15]. The results showed that 6 patients in the dCRT group had a local recurrence (19%), whereas none of the patients in the ESD-CRT group had a local recurrence (p=0.029) [15]. Hamada et al. also reported that endoscopic resection followed by CRT attained survival rates (5-year overall survival rate, 75%) comparable with those with esophagectomy or definitive CRT [16]. In their study, cancers without lymphovascular involvement showed favorable outcomes [16]. None of the 30 patients without lymphovascular involvement had a metastatic recurrence, whereas 6 of the 36 patients with lymphovascular involvement showed a metastatic recurrence (p=0.0098) [16]. These results suggest that CRT after ESD could be an effective method for non-curatively resected lesions. However, further studies would be needed to demonstrate the efficacy of CRT after non-curative resection of esophageal cancer.
It is meaningful that Lee et al. reported the long-term outcomes of treatment and observation groups after non-curative resection of esophageal cancer among Korean patients [12]. It is particularly meaningful that their study showed close observation to be a potential option for patients who have undergone a complete non-curative resection and are unable to receive additional therapy considering the high mortality associated with esophagectomy. However, more well-designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to definitively determine which patients should be eligible for observation without additional therapy.
Notes
Conflicts of Interest:The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.