Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Interventional"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Forward viewing liner echoendoscopy for therapeutic interventions
Kazuo Hara, Nozomi Okuno, Shin Haba, Takamichi Kuwahara
Clin Endosc 2024;57(2):175-180.   Published online February 29, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.271
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures using the forward-viewing convex EUS (FV-EUS) have been reviewed based on the articles reported to date. The earliest reported procedure is the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using FV-EUS. However, the study on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts focused on showing that drainage is possible with FV-EUS rather than leveraging its features. Subsequently, studies describing the characteristics of FV-EUS have been reported. By using FV-EUS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, double punctures in the gastrointestinal tract can be avoided. In postoperative modified anatomical cases, using the endoscopic function of FV-EUS, procedures such as bile duct drainage from anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage from the afferent limb, and abscess drainage from the digestive tract have been reported. When a perpendicular puncture to the gastrointestinal tract is required or when there is a need to insert the endoscope deep into the gastrointestinal tract, FV-EUS is considered among the options.
  • 2,871 View
  • 167 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
Stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
Seigo Nakatani, Kosuke Okuwaki, Masafumi Watanabe, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Tomohisa Iwai, Takaaki Matsumoto, Rikiya Hasegawa, Hironori Masutani, Takahiro Kurosu, Akihiro Tamaki, Junro Ishizaki, Ayana Ishizaki, Mitsuhiro Kida, Chika Kusano
Clin Endosc 2024;57(1):89-95.   Published online April 18, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.288
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: In stereomicroscopic sample isolation processing, the cutoff value (≥4 mm) of stereomicroscopically visible white cores indicates high diagnostic sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using a simplified stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs).
Methods
In this multicenter prospective trial, we performed EUS-TA using a 22-gauge Franseen needle in 34 participants with SELs derived from the upper gastrointestinal muscularis propria, requiring pathological diagnosis. The presence of stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) in each specimen was assessed using stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation. The primary outcome was EUS-TA’s diagnostic sensitivity with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation based on the SVWC cutoff value (≥4 mm) for malignant upper gastrointestinal SELs.
Results
The total number of punctures was 68; 61 specimens (89.7%) contained stereomicroscopically visible white cores ≥4 mm in size. The final diagnoses were gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyoma, and schwannoma in 76.5%, 14.7%, and 8.8% of the cases, respectively. The sensitivity of EUS-TA with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation based on the SVWC cutoff value for malignant SELs was 100%. The per-lesion accuracy of histological diagnosis reached the highest level (100%) at the second puncture.
Conclusions
Stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation showed high diagnostic sensitivity and could be a new method for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal SELs using EUS-TA.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?
    Yu Kyung Cho
    Clinical Endoscopy.2024; 57(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using Fork-Tip Needle for Subepithelial Lesions: A Single-Center Validation Study
    Masafumi Watanabe, Kosuke Okuwaki, Tomohisa Iwai, Mitsuhiro Kida, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Kai Adachi, Akihiro Tamaki, Junro Ishizaki, Taro Hanaoka, Chika Kusano
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Esophageal Leiomyoma with Cystic Degeneration Mimicking a Malignant Neoplasm
    Gwang Ha Kim, Dong Chan Joo, Moon Won Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Kyungbin Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 1,837 View
  • 140 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Role of interventional endoscopic ultrasound in a developing country
Hasan Maulahela, Nagita Gianty Annisa, Achmad Fauzi, Kaka Renaldi, Murdani Abdullah, Marcellus Simadibrata, Dadang Makmun, Ari Fahrial Syam
Clin Endosc 2023;56(1):100-106.   Published online January 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.058
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential diagnostic and therapeutic tool. EUS was introduced in 2013 in Indonesia and is considered relatively new. This study aimed to describe the current role of interventional EUS at our hospital as a part of the Indonesian tertiary health center experience.
Methods
This retrospective study included all patients who underwent interventional EUS (n=94) at our center between January 2015 and December 2020. Patient characteristics, technical success, clinical success, and adverse events associated with each type of interventional EUS procedure were evaluated.
Results
Altogether, 94 interventional EUS procedures were performed at our center between 2015 and 2020 including 75 cases of EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), 14 cases of EUS-guided pancreatic fluid drainage, and five cases of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. The technical and clinical success rates of EUS-BD were 98.6% and 52%, respectively. The technical success rate was 100% for both EUS-guided pancreatic fluid drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. The adverse event rates were 10.6% and 7.1% for EUS-BD and EUS-guided pancreatic fluid drainage, respectively.
Conclusions
EUS is an effective and safe tool for the treatment of gastrointestinal and biliary diseases. It has a low rate of adverse events, even in developing countries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • EUS-guided interventional therapies for pancreatic diseases
    Rongmin Xu, Kai Zhang, Nan Ge, Siyu Sun
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2,055 View
  • 135 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided, Percutaneous, and Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Thomas R. McCarty, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Basile Njei, Marvin Ryou, Harry R. Aslanian, Thiruvengadam Muniraj
Clin Endosc 2020;53(5):583-593.   Published online September 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.211
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: Percutaneous liver biopsy (PCLB) or transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) have traditionally been performed to obtain a sample of hepatic tissue; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUSLB) has become an attractive alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB.
Methods
Search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Major outcomes included the following: adequacy of biopsy specimens (i.e., complete portal triads [CPT], total specimen length [TSL] in mm, and length of longest piece [LLP]) in mm), and rate of adverse events. Only studies comparing all biopsy approaches (i.e., EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB) were included.
Results
Five studies (EUSLB [n=301]; PCLB [n=176]; and TJLB [n=179]) were included. Biopsy cumulative adequacy rates for EUSLB, PCLB, and TJLB were 93.51%, 98.27%, and 97.61%, respectively. Based on the subgroup analysis limited to EUS biopsy needles in current clinical practice, there was no difference in biopsy adequacy or adverse events for EUSLB compared to PCLB and TJLB (all p>0.050). A comparison of EUSLB and PCLB revealed no difference between specimens regarding both CPT (p=0.079) and LLP (p=0.085); however, a longer TSL (p<0.001) was observed. Compared to TJLB, EUSLB showed no difference in LLP (p=0.351), fewer CPT (p=0.042), and longer TSL (p=0.005).
Conclusions
EUSLB appears to be a safe, minimally invasive procedure that is comparable to PCLB and TJLB regarding biopsy specimens obtained and rate of adverse events associated with each method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic procedures in hepatology: Current trends and new developments
    Wim Laleman, Emma Vanderschueren, Zain Seyad Mehdi, Reiner Wiest, Andres Cardenas, Jonel Trebicka
    Journal of Hepatology.2024; 80(1): 124.     CrossRef
  • Gut-liver axis: Pathophysiological concepts and medical perspective in chronic liver diseases
    Susana G. Rodrigues, Schalk van der Merwe, Aleksander Krag, Reiner Wiest
    Seminars in Immunology.2024; 71: 101859.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of diagnostic outcomes, safety, and cost of Franseen-tip 19G versus 22G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsies
    Ankit Dalal, Nagesh Kamat, Gaurav Patil, Amol Vadgaonkar, Sanil Parekh, Sehajad Vora, Amit Maydeo
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(02): E291.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in liver transplant recipients: A preliminary experience
    Wei Rao, Yue-Ping Jiang, Jin-Zhen Cai, Man Xie
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Diagnostic Adequacy Between Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Percutaneous Liver Biopsies: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
    Mansoor Ahmad, Taslova Tahsin Abedin, Faria Khilji, Kinan Obeidat, Lam Vinh Sieu, Sandipkumar S Chaudhari, Divine Besong Arrey Agbor, Danish Allahwala
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative accuracy of endosonographic shear wave elastography and transcutaneous liver stiffness measurement: a pilot study
    Divyanshoo R. Kohli, Daniel Mettman, Nevene Andraws, Erin Haer, Jaime Porter, Ozlem Ulusurac, Steven Ullery, Madhav Desai, Mohammad S. Siddiqui, Prateek Sharma
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 97(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of outcomes
    Saurabh Chandan, Smit Deliwala, ShahabR Khan, BabuP Mohan, BanreetS Dhindsa, Jay Bapaye, Hemant Goyal, LenaL Kassab, Faisal Kamal, HarlanR Sayles, GursimranS Kochhar, DouglasG Adler
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Liver Biopsy
    Daryl Ramai, Viraaj Pannu, Antonio Facciorusso, Banreet Dhindsa, Joseph Heaton, Andrew Ofosu, Saurabh Chandan, Marcello Maida, Barbara Lattanzi, Eduardo Rodriguez, Vicky H. Bhagat, Jayanta Samanta, Monique T. Barakat
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(4): 784.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Advances in Hepatology
    Emma Vanderschueren, Jonel Trebicka, Wim Laleman
    Seminars in Liver Disease.2023; 43(02): 176.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Tissue Samples Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
    José Lariño-Noia, Javier Fernández-Castroagudín, Daniel de la Iglesia-García, Héctor Lázare, Laura Nieto, Sol Porto, Nicolau Vallejo-Senra, Esther Molina, Alba San Bruno, Xurxo Martínez-Seara, Julio Iglesias-García, Silvia García-Acuña, J. Enrique Domíngu
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(10): 1821.     CrossRef
  • Endo-hepatology: Updates for the clinical hepatologist
    Frances Lee, Tarun Rustagi, R. Todd Frederick
    Clinical Liver Disease.2023; 22(2): 42.     CrossRef
  • Technical Success, Sample Adequacy, and Complications of  Pediatric Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karen Smayra, Shahid Miangul, Nathanael Yap, Ao Shi, Fatma Abdulsalam, Maamoun Adra, Hayato Nakanishi, Jake Ball, Tara A. Betts, Christian A. Than, Aneeta Parthipun
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2023; 68(10): 3846.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in diagnosing hepatic focal lesions
    Hussein Hassan Okasha, Hanane Delsa, Abdelmoneim Alsawaf, Ahmed Morad Hashim, Hani M Khattab, Dalia Abdelfatah, Abeer Abdellatef, Amr Albitar
    World Journal of Methodology.2023; 13(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases
    Yihebali Chi, Liming Jiang, Susheng Shi, Shun He, Chunmei Bai, Dan Cao, Jianqiang Cai, Qichen Chen, Xiao Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Shunda Du, Zhen Huang, Li Huo, Yuan Ji, Jie Li, Wenhui Lou, Jie Luo, Xueying Shi, Lijie Song, Bei Sun, Huangying Tan, Feng Wang, Xu
    Journal of Pancreatology.2023; 6(4): 139.     CrossRef
  • Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities
    Chao Sun, Xingliang Zhao, Lei Shi, Xiaofei Fan, Xiaolong Qi
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2023; 12(6): 437.     CrossRef
  • Endo-Hepatology: The Buzz Goes Much beyond Liver Biopsy—A Narrative Review
    Rajesh Puri, Zubin Sharma, Swapnil Dhampalwar, Abhishek Kathuria, Bimal Sahu
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 14(04): 227.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Daryl Ramai, Carlo Fabbri, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Andrea Lisotti, Nicola Muscatiello, Christian Cotsoglou, Pietro Fusaroli
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy Using Newer 19G FNB Needles Compared to Percutaneous and Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Tertiary Center Experience
    Harsh K. Patel, George Therapondos, Gretchen Galliano, Ricardo. Romero, John Evans, Ari Cohen, Muhammad F. Mubarak, Janak N. Shah, Abdul Hamid El Chafic
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a meta-analysis
    Keyu Zeng, Zhenpeng Jiang, Jie Yang, Kefei Chen, Qiang Lu
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(5): 545.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer
    Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Eun Ji Shin
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 14(4): 191.     CrossRef
  • Endohepatology – current status
    Jerome C. Edelson, Natalie E. Mitchell, Don C. Rockey
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2022; 38(3): 216.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and interventional EUS in hepatology: An updated review
    Vaneet Jearth, Sridhar Sundaram, SurinderSingh Rana
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(5): 355.     CrossRef
  • A Gene Expression Signature to Select Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Liver Transplantation
    Hugo Pinto-Marques, Joana Cardoso, Sílvia Silva, João L. Neto, Maria Gonçalves-Reis, Daniela Proença, Marta Mesquita, André Manso, Sara Carapeta, Mafalda Sobral, Antonio Figueiredo, Clara Rodrigues, Adelaide Milheiro, Ana Carvalho, Rui Perdigoto, Eduardo
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(5): 868.     CrossRef
  • Endo‐hepatology: The changing paradigm of endoscopic ultrasound in cirrhosis
    Achintya Dinesh Singh, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Christina C. Lindenmeyer
    Clinical Liver Disease.2022; 20(6): 209.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility and Safety of Transjugular Liver Biopsy for Japanese Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases
    Makoto Iijima, Takahiro Arisaka, Akira Yamamiya, Keiichi Tominaga, Kazunori Nagashima, Akira Kanamori, Satoshi Masuyama, Yuichi Majima, Kenichi Goda, Kazuyuki Ishida, Atsushi Irisawa
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(1): 131.     CrossRef
  • Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
    Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Disease: Where Do We Stand?
    Tajana Pavic, Ivana Mikolasevic, Dominik Kralj, Nina Blazevic, Anita Skrtic, Ivan Budimir, Ivan Lerotic, Davor Hrabar
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2021.     CrossRef
  • 6,133 View
  • 174 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 27 Crossref
Close layer
Focused Review Series: Endoscopic Hemostasis: An Overview of Principles and Recent Applications
Endoscopic Therapy and Radiologic Intervention of Acute Gastroesophageal Variceal Bleeding
Jeong Eun Song, Byung Seok Kim
Clin Endosc 2019;52(5):407-415.   Published online September 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.178
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is a dreaded complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Endoscopic therapy and radiologic intervention for gastroesophageal bleeding have rapidly developed in the recent decades. Endoscopic treatment is initially performed to stop variceal hemorrhage. For the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is considered the endoscopic treatment of choice. In cases of gastric variceal hemorrhage, the type of gastric varices (GVs) is important in deciding the strategy of endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) is recommended for fundal variceal bleeding. For the management of gastroesophageal varix type 1 bleeding, both EVO and EVL are available treatment options; however, EVO is preferred over EVL. If endoscopic management fails to control variceal hemorrhage, radiologic interventional modalities could be considered. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a good option for rescue treatment in refractory variceal bleeding. In cases of refractory hemorrhage of GVs in patients with a gastrorenal shunt, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration could be considered as a salvage treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophagojejunal variceal bleeding after total gastrectomy: A case report
    Sang Un Kim, Jihoon Hong
    Radiology Case Reports.2024; 19(8): 3231.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of early re-ligation after endoscopic gastric glue injection combined with endoscopic variceal ligation in preventing rebleeding of esophagogastric varices in patients with cirrhosis
    Hui-Min Liu, Zhi-Bin Gong
    World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2022; 30(17): 748.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Interventional Radiology in Esophageal Varices and Hematemesis: Review Article
    Qaed Salem Alhammami, Maisa Hamad Freaj Alanazi, Shahad Khalid A Bedaiwi, Ghazir Aneed N Alruwili, Shouq Fayed Khalaf Alanazi
    Archives of Pharmacy Practice.2022; 13(4): 7.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive treatment of patients with gastric variceal bleeding
    S.M. Chooklin, S.S. Chuklin
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE.2022; 18(8): 14.     CrossRef
  • 8,252 View
  • 320 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Reviews
Review of Simultaneous Double Stenting Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage Techniques in Combined Gastric Outlet and Biliary Obstructions
Hao Chi Zhang, Monica Tamil, Keshav Kukreja, Shashideep Singhal
Clin Endosc 2020;53(2):167-175.   Published online August 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.050
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Concomitant malignant gastric outlet obstruction and biliary obstruction may occur in patients with advanced cancers affecting these anatomical regions. This scenario presents a unique challenge to the endoscopist in selecting an optimal management approach. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of endoscopic techniques for treating simultaneous gastric outlet and biliary obstruction (GOBO) with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance for biliary drainage. An extensive literature search for peer-reviewed published cases yielded 6 unique case series that either focused on or included the use of EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) with simultaneous gastroduodenal stenting. In our composite analysis, a total of 51 patients underwent simultaneous biliary drainage through EUS, with an overall reported technical success rate of 100% for both duodenal stenting and biliary drainage. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy or EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy was employed as the initial technique. In 34 cases in which clinical success was ascribed, 100% derived clinical benefit. The common adverse effects of double stenting included cholangitis, stent migration, bleeding, food impaction, and pancreatitis. We conclude that simultaneous double stenting with EUS-BD and gastroduodenal stenting for GOBO is associated with high success rates. It is a feasible and practical alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage or surgery for palliation in patients with associated advanced malignancies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
    Woo Hyun Paik, Do Hyun Park
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America.2024; 34(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic double stenting using an anti‐reflux metal stent for combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction
    Takashi Sasaki, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Yuto Yamada, Takeshi Okamoto, Chinatsu Mori, Takafumi Mie, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2023; 30(1): 144.     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review of Endoscopic Treatments for Concomitant Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction and the Outstanding Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Therapies
    Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Lucio Carrozza, Dario Quintini, Dario Ligresti, Mario Traina, Ilaria Tarantino
    Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2585.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent as rescue treatment for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a large multicenter experience
    Cecilia Binda, Andrea Anderloni, Alessandro Fugazza, Arnaldo Amato, Germana de Nucci, Alessandro Redaelli, Roberto Di Mitri, Luigi Cugia, Valeria Pollino, Raffaele Macchiarelli, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Edoardo Forti, Mario Luciano Brancaccio, Roberta Bad
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2023; 98(5): 765.     CrossRef
  • Choledochoduodenostomy Versus Hepaticogastrostomy in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Kejie Mao, Binbin Hu, Feng Sun, Kaiming Wan
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2022; 32(1): 124.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of endoscopic duodenal stent versus endoscopic or surgical gastrojejunostomy to treat malignant gastric outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Shivanand Bomman, Petros Benias, Richard A. Kozarek, Joyce A. Peetermans, Edmund McMullen, Ornela Gjata, Shayan S. Irani
    Endoscopy International Open.2022; 10(06): E874.     CrossRef
  • 4,832 View
  • 212 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Current Status of Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage
Joey Ho Yi Chan, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
Clin Endosc 2018;51(2):150-155.   Published online November 17, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.125
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
The gold standard for treatment of acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, cholecystectomy is often not suitable for surgically unfit patients who are too frail due to various co-morbidities. As such, several less invasive endoscopic treatment modalities have been developed to control sepsis, either as a definitive treatment or as a temporizing modality until the patient is stable enough to undergo cholecystectomy at a later stage. Recent developments in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-specific stents having lumen-apposing properties have demonstrated potential as a definitive treatment modality. Furthermore, advanced gallbladder procedures can be performed using the stents as a portal. With similar effectiveness as percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and lower rates of adverse events reported in some studies, EUS-GBD has opened exciting possibilities in becoming the next best alternative in treating acute cholecystitis in surgically unfit patients. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary of the various methods of gallbladder drainage (GBD) with particular focus on EUS-GBD and the many new prospects it allows.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines
    Federico Coccolini, Eugenio Cucinotta, Andrea Mingoli, Mauro Zago, Gaia Altieri, Alan Biloslavo, Roberto Caronna, Ismail Cengeli, Enrico Cicuttin, Roberto Cirocchi, Luigi Cobuccio, Gianluca Costa, Valerio Cozza, Camilla Cremonini, Giovanni Del Vecchio, Gi
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 331.     CrossRef
  • Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management
    Elia Armellini, Flavio Metelli, Andrea Anderloni, Anna Cominardi, Giovanni Aragona, Michele Marini, Fabio Pace
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(21): 3341.     CrossRef
  • Nonsurgical Gallbladder Drainage: Percutaneous and Endoscopic Approaches
    Gregory Toy, Douglas G. Adler
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2022; 24(1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Current status of endoscopic management of cholecystitis
    Se Woo Park, Sang Soo Lee
    Digestive Endoscopy.2022; 34(3): 439.     CrossRef
  • Lumen Apposition: A Changing Landscape in Therapeutic Endoscopy
    Thomas R. McCarty, Christopher C. Thompson
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(5): 1660.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided drainage of the gallbladder using a novel 0.018-inch guidewire for preventing bile leakage (with video)
    Mamoru Takenaka, Shunsuke Omoto, Masatoshi Kudo
    Endoscopic Ultrasound.2022; 11(6): 520.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage
    Zain A. Sobani, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2021; 66(7): 2154.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for symptomatic gallbladder disease: a cumulative systematic review meta-analysis
    Thomas R. McCarty, Kelly E. Hathorn, Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi, Kunal Jajoo, Marvin Ryou, Christopher C. Thompson
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(9): 4964.     CrossRef
  • Acute biliary interventions
    T.C. See
    Clinical Radiology.2020; 75(5): 398.e9.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the same session
    Raul Torres Yuste, Francisco Javier Garcia‐Alonso, Ramón Sanchez‐Ocana, Marta Cimavilla Roman, Irene Peñas Herrero, Ana Yaiza Carbajo, Marina De Benito Sanz, Natalia Mora Cuadrado, Carlos De la Serna Higuera, Manuel Perez‐Miranda
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(4): 608.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents
    Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Shayan Irani
    Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2020; 22(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Fatal Bile Peritonitis after Malposition of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided 5-Fr Naso-Gallbladder Drainage
    Tae Hyung Kim, Hyun Jin Bae, Seung Goun Hong
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(1): 97.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided versus endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, Mahendran Jayaraj, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar, Dhruv Singh, Joanna Law, Michael Larsen, Andrew Ross, Richard Kozarek, Shayan Irani
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 1904.     CrossRef
  • Recent development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
    Brian Kin Hang Lam, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
    International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2020; 9(4): 148.     CrossRef
  • 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis
    Michele Pisano, Niccolò Allievi, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Giuseppe Borzellino, Stefania Cimbanassi, Djamila Boerna, Federico Coccolini, Andrea Tufo, Marcello Di Martino, Jeffrey Leung, Massimo Sartelli, Marco Ceresoli, Ronald V. Maier, Elia Poiasina, Nicola De
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Guidewire May Save the Day
    Rajat Garg, Mohammed Barawi
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 72(2): 83.     CrossRef
  • 7,952 View
  • 335 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Linear Array Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Eun Young Kim, M.D.
Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2009;38(1):1-8.   Published online January 30, 2009
AbstractAbstract PDF
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was first developed to observe the pancreas more clearly without interference from the air and the abdominal wall. EUS is currently being used as an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool for various gastrointestinal diseases. Until recently, a radial echoendoscope with a vertical scanning plane has been mainly used, but a linear echoendoscope (linear EUS) with a parallel scanning plane has been recently developed. With the introduction of linear EUS, it is possible to perform many interventional procedures, including fine needle aspiration, and the field of EUS has been greatly expanded. This article briefly reviews the accepted procedures and the new trials using linear EUS. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2009;38:1-8)
  • 1,902 View
  • 10 Download
Close layer

Close layer
TOP