Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Won Moon"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Recent advances in surveillance colonoscopy for dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease
Soo-Young Na, Won Moon
Clin Endosc 2022;55(6):726-735.   Published online November 18, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.132
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a global presence with rapidly increasing incidence and prevalence. Patients with IBD including those with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population. Risk factors for CRC in patients with IBD include long disease duration, extensive colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, family history of CRC, stricture, and prior dysplasia. Surveillance colonoscopy for CRC in patients with IBD should be tailored to individualized risk factors and requires careful monitoring every year to every five years. The current surveillance techniques are based on several guidelines. Chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsy is being recommended increasingly, and high-definition colonoscopy is gradually replacing standard-definition colonoscopy. However, it remains unclear whether chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, or white-light endoscopy has better efficiency when a high-definition scope is used. With the development of new endoscopic instruments and techniques, the paradigm of surveillance strategy has gradually changed. In this review, we discuss cutting-edge surveillance colonoscopy in patients with IBD including a review of literature.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: One disease or two?
    Kim N. van Munster, Annika Bergquist, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen
    Journal of Hepatology.2024; 80(1): 155.     CrossRef
  • Extrachromosomal Circular DNA: An Emerging Potential Biomarker for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?
    Valentina Petito, Federica Di Vincenzo, Lorenza Putignani, Maria T. Abreu, Birgitte Regenberg, Antonio Gasbarrini, Franco Scaldaferri
    Genes.2024; 15(4): 414.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases
    Seung Hong, Dong Baek
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(7): 1262.     CrossRef
  • Potential Oral Microbial Markers for Differential Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Using Machine Learning Models
    Sang-Bum Kang, Hyeonwoo Kim, Sangsoo Kim, Jiwon Kim, Soo-Kyung Park, Chil-Woo Lee, Kyeong Ok Kim, Geom-Seog Seo, Min Suk Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Ja Seol Koo, Dong-Il Park
    Microorganisms.2023; 11(7): 1665.     CrossRef
  • Update on Endoscopic Dysplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu, James D. Lewis
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(10): 1748.     CrossRef
  • 2,922 View
  • 206 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Efficacy and Safety of Etomidate in Comparison with Propofol or Midazolam as Sedative for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Jae Hyun Kim, Sanghwan Byun, Youn Jung Choi, Hye Jung Kwon, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Moo In Park, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
Clin Endosc 2020;53(5):555-561.   Published online March 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.210
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aims: In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate with those of propofol or midazolam for the maintenance of sedation during endoscopy.
Methods
The study enrolled patients who underwent sedative endoscopy in our hospital and divided them into three groups. Patients in each group were administered midazolam as induction therapy and were subsequently administered either midazolam (M + M group), propofol (M + P group), or etomidate (M + E group) as maintenance medication. The primary outcome was overall cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events.
Results
In total, 105 patients who underwent sedative endoscopic examination were enrolled. The outcomes related to the procedure and sedation were not significantly different among the groups. Overall cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events were observed in 9 patients (25.7%) in the M + M group, 8 patients (23.5%) in the M + P group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in the M + E group. The logistic regression analysis revealed that etomidate use was not an independent risk factor for overall cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events.
Conclusions
The outcomes following the use of etomidate for maintenance after induction with midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were not inferior to those following midazolam or propofol use from the perspectives of safety and efficacy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of ciprofol–alfentanil and propofol–alfentanil sedation during bidirectional endoscopy: A prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial
    Jiqiang Zhang, Ruijuan Liu, Ruirui Bi, Xia Li, Mengjun Xu, Lijuan Li, Yuxi su, Wenjun Yan
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(4): 663.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Earmuffs and Eye Masks on Propofol Sedation during Spinal Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jin-Woo Park, Sung Il Bae, Jungyul Ryu, Seung Hyun Chung, Sang-Hwan Do
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(3): 899.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intravenous anesthesia by etomidate in combination with propofol on gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Bo CHEN, Ke ZHANG, Mingshuai YU
    Minerva Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New sedatives and analgesic drugs for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures
    Jae Min Lee, Yehyun Park, Jin Myung Park, Hong Jun Park, Jun Yong Bae, Seung Young Seo, Jee Hyun Lee, Hyung Ku Chon, Jun-Won Chung, Hyun Ho Choi, Jun Kyu Lee, Byung-Wook Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(5): 581.     CrossRef
  • Drugs used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Jun Kyu Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(11): 735.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Safety Profiles of Sedatives Commonly Used in Clinical Practice: A 10-Year Nationwide Pharmacovigilance Study in Korea
    Yeo-Jin Choi, Seung-Won Yang, Won-Gun Kwack, Jun-Kyu Lee, Tae-Hee Lee, Jae-Yong Jang, Eun-Kyoung Chung
    Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(8): 783.     CrossRef
  • Physical and Chemical Compatibility of Etomidate and Propofol Injectable Emulsions
    Chunling Wang, Shengnan Wang, Cuishuan Wu, Li Lei, Dong-Xin Wang, Qiang Zhang
    Pharmacology.2021; 106(11-12): 644.     CrossRef
  • 4,881 View
  • 199 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Is it Possible to Successfully Treat Locally Advanced Colon Cancer Using Pre-Operative Chemoradiotherapy?
Ji Hun Choi, Jae Hyun Kim, Won Moon, Seung Hun Lee, Sung Uhn Baek, Byung Kwon Ahn, Jung Gu Park, Seun Ja Park
Clin Endosc 2019;52(2):191-195.   Published online November 9, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.088
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a preferable treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, few data are available regarding pre-operative CRT for locally advanced colon cancer. Here, we describe two cases of successful treatment with pre-operative CRT and establish evidence supporting this treatment option in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. In the first case, a 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with ascending colon cancer with duodenal invasion. In the second case, a 63-year-old man was diagnosed with a colonic-duodenal fistula due to transverse colon cancer invasion. These case reports will help to establish a treatment consensus for pre-operative CRT in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluation of colon cancer prognostic factors by CT and MRI: an up-to-date review
    Ruggeri B. Guimarães, Eduardo O. Pacheco, Serli N. Ueda, Dario A. Tiferes, Fernanda L. Mazzucato, Aley Talans, Ulysses S. Torres, Giuseppe D’Ippolito
    Abdominal Radiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,554 View
  • 130 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Effect of Sending Educational Video Clips via Smartphone Mobile Messenger on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy
Sung Chan Jeon, Jae Hyun Kim, Sun Jung Kim, Hye Jung Kwon, Youn Jung Choi, Kyoungwon Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park
Clin Endosc 2019;52(1):53-58.   Published online August 29, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.072
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background
/Aim: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sending educational video clips via smartphone mobile messenger (SMM) on enhancing bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
Methods
This was a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled study. Patients in the SMM group received two video clips sent via SMM that explained the diet and regimen for bowel preparation, whereas those in the control group did not receive any video clips. We compared the quality of bowel preparation between the two groups, which was assessed by an endoscopist using the Ottawa scale.
Results
Between August and November 2014, 140 patients in the SMM group and 141 patients in the control group underwent colonoscopic examination. The total Ottawa score of the SMM group was significantly lower than that of the control group (5.47±1.74 vs. 5.97±1.78, p=0.018). These results were particularly prominent in the younger age group; the total Ottawa score of patents in the SMM group aged <40 years was significantly lower than that of patients in the control group aged <40 years (5.10±1.55 vs. 6.22±2.33, p=0.034).
Conclusions
We demonstrated that sending educational video clips via SMM could result in better bowel preparation, especially in the younger age group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Evaluation of the effect of reinforced education on the satisfaction of patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial
    Negin Farid, Shakila Sharifian, Raziyeh Ghafouri, Antonio Brillantino
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(1): e0296126.     CrossRef
  • Can an educational video improve the adequacy of bowel preparation for patients undergoing their first colonoscopy? Results of the EBOPS RCT
    Thomas Archer, Bernard Corfe, Keith Dear, Andy Cole, Stephen Foley, H Jervoise N Andreyev, Waleed Fateen, Andrew Baxter, Stuart Riley, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, Mo Thoufeeq
    Endoscopy International Open.2024; 12(03): E402.     CrossRef
  • Improving Colonoscopy Preparation Using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Randomized Clinical Trial
    Diego Mauricio Aponte Martín, Claudia Liliana Corso Bernal, María Valentina Aponte Aparicio, Luis Carlos Sabbagh Sanvicente
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2024; 39(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • A smartphone application to enhance bowel preparation for first-time colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study
    Tanawat Pattarapuntakul, Thanyaporn Kanchanasuwan, Apichat Kaewdech, Thanawin Wong, Nisa Netinatsunton, Nalerdon Chalermsuksant, Pimsiri Sripongpun
    Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Edukacinio 3D virtualiosios realybės vaizdo metodo įtaka ruošiant žarnyną kolonoskopijai: pirmieji rezultatai
    Edvinas Kildušis, Gintautas Brimas
    Lietuvos chirurgija.2024; 23(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of bowel preparation innovative technology instructions (BPITIs) on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parichat Wonggom, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Orathai Suebkinorn
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of WeChat guidance on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a quasi-experiment study
    Yifang Guan, Yanjun Song, Xiaona Li, Aijun Zhang, Ruyuan Li
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation between prescribing doctor attributes and intestinal cleanliness in colonoscopy: a study of 22522 patients
    Haibin Zhou, Hayat Khizar, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang
    Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Ted B. Walker, Tricia A. Hengehold, Kevin Garza, Benjamin D. Rogers, Dayna Early
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(6): 2347.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841.     CrossRef
  • Patient education by smartphones for bowel preparation before colonoscopy
    Peng Li, Xueqian He, Xufang Yang, Jing Du, Weiquan Wu, Jiangfeng Tu
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(7): 1349.     CrossRef
  • Los efectos de la educación perfeccionada, realizada por enfermeros en la calidad de la preparación intestinal para colonoscopia
    Gamze Arslanca, Mahmure Aygün
    Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of nurse-performed enhanced patient education on colonoscopy bowel preparation quality
    Gamze Arslanca, Mahmure Aygün
    Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Os efeitos da educação aprimorada, realizada por enfermeiros na qualidade do preparo intestinal para colonoscopia
    Gamze Arslanca, Mahmure Aygün
    Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 80(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Multimedia based education on bowel preparation improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review & meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Arora, Babu P. Mohan, Shahab R. Khan, Ojasvini C. Chandan, Lena L. Kassab, Arvind R. Murali
    Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 33(5): 730.     CrossRef
  • Mobile health technologies supporting colonoscopy preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Maria El Bizri, Mariam El Sheikh, Ga Eun Lee, Maida J. Sewitch, Tim Mathes
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(3): e0248679.     CrossRef
  • Effects of mobile messenger counseling on case management success for individuals engaging in self-harm or suicide attempts who were discharged from emergency departments
    Ji Min Seong, Youngsuk Cho, Gyu Chong Cho, Jongshill Lee, In Young Kim, Hongtaek Seo, Jungmi Kim
    Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2021; 8(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Quality Improvement of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopies: A Study of Hospital Team Resource Management in Taiwan
    Chen-Shuan Chung, Chih-Ming Lin, Ming-Shu Chen
    Quality Management in Health Care.2021; 30(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Effects of a Personalized Smartphone App on Bowel Preparation Quality: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Quirine E W van der Zander, Ankie Reumkens, Bas van de Valk, Bjorn Winkens, Ad A M Masclee, Rogier J J de Ridder
    JMIR mHealth and uHealth.2021; 9(8): e26703.     CrossRef
  • Safe and appropriate use of laxatives for colonoscopy
    Won Shik Kim, Beom Jae Lee
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(8): 561.     CrossRef
  • Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade
    Gwang Ha Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Do Hyun Park, Jimin Han
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(5): 633.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu Tian, Li-Juan Yi, Yang Han, Hui Chen, Xiao-Ling Liu, Wei-Qing Chen, Maria F Jiménez-Herrera
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(10): e19915.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Educational Methods on Bowel Preparation for Coloncopy: Systematic Literature Review
    Edvinas Kildušis, Gintautas Brimas
    Lietuvos chirurgija.2021; 20(3-4): 135.     CrossRef
  • Educating Patients by Providing Timely Information Using Smartphone and Tablet Apps: Systematic Review
    Thomas Timmers, Loes Janssen, Rudolf B Kool, Jan AM Kremer
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(4): e17342.     CrossRef
  • How Can We Achieve Good Compliance for Bowel Preparation?
    Jongha Park, Tae Oh Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2019; 52(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • 6,212 View
  • 213 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Reviews
Chronological Review of Endoscopic Indices in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Joon Seop Lee, Eun Soo Kim, Won Moon
Clin Endosc 2019;52(2):129-136.   Published online August 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.042
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered a chronic condition characterized by mucosal or transmural inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance in patients with IBD have become crucial. In addition, endoscopy is a useful modality in estimation and evaluation of the disease, treatment results, and efficacy of treatment delivery and surveillance. In relation to these aspects, endoscopic disease activity has been commonly estimated in clinical practices and trials.
At present, many endoscopic indices of ulcerative colitis have been introduced, including the Truelove and Witts Endoscopy Index, Baron Index, Powell-Tuck Index, Sutherland Index, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Sub-Score, Rachmilewitz Index, Modified Baron Index, Endoscopic Activity Index, Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity, Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopic Index of Severity, and Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score. Endoscopic indices have been also suggested for Crohn’s disease, such as the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease, and Rutgeerts Postoperative Endoscopic Index. However, most endoscopic indices have not been validated owing to the complexity of their parameters and inter-observer variations. Therefore, a chronological approach for understanding the various endoscopic indices relating to IBD is needed to improve the management.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The assessment of segmental healing by the Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score (MMES) complements the prediction of long‐term clinical outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Matthias Lenfant, Bram Verstockt, João Sabino, Séverine Vermeire, Marc Ferrante
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2024; 59(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • Recent Trends in Non-Invasive Methods of Diagnosis and Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Short Review
    Dan Vălean, Roxana Zaharie, Roman Țaulean, Lia Usatiuc, Florin Zaharie
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(4): 2077.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of the Pancolonic Modified Mayo Score in predicting the long-term outcomes of ulcerative colitis: a promising scoring system
    Péter Bacsur, Panu Wetwittayakhlang, Tamás Resál, Emese Földi, Béla Vasas, Bernadett Farkas, Mariann Rutka, Talat Bessissow, Waqqas Afif, Anita Bálint, Anna Fábián, Renáta Bor, Zoltán Szepes, Klaudia Farkas, Peter L Lakatos, Tamás Molnár
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disease clearance in ulcerative colitis: Setting the therapeutic goals for future in the treatment of ulcerative colitis
    Laura Ramos, Jeny Teo-Loy, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of Standardized Inflammatory Bowel Disease Endoscopy Scores in Clinical Practice
    Jill K J Gaidos, Badr Al Bawardy, Francis A Farraye, Miguel Regueiro
    Crohn's & Colitis 360.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis: Real-World Mucosal Healing in Vedolizumab-Treated Patients with Crohn’s Disease
    Silvio Danese, Pravin Kamble, Jin Yang, Jean-Gabriel Le Moine, Shahnaz Khan, Emma Hawe, Christian Agboton, Song Wang, Peter M. Irving, Than Than Aye
    GastroHep.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Endoscopic Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis: Is Simplicity the Ultimate Sophistication?
    Ala I. Sharara, Maher Malaeb, Matthias Lenfant, Marc Ferrante
    Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases.2022; 7(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical significance and application in practice
    Kyeong Ok Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(4): 480.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Mucosal Healing in Crohn’s Disease: A Nomogram Model Developed from a Retrospective Cohort
    Nana Tang, Han Chen, Ruidong Chen, Wen Tang, Hongjie Zhang
    Journal of Inflammation Research.2022; Volume 15: 5515.     CrossRef
  • Micronutrient deficiency among patients with ulcerative colitis
    Amany Hussien, Sawsan Abd El-Moniem, Ziyad Tawhid, Ahmed Altonbary
    The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • State-of-the-art surgery for ulcerative colitis
    Shanglei Liu, Samuel Eisenstein
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(6): 1751.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic beads in gastrointestinal tract
    Eva Karásková, Miloš Geryk, Radek Vrba, Tomáš Malý FEBPS, Jakub Čivrný, Dagmar Pospíšilová
    Pediatrie pro praxi.2021; 22(5): 346.     CrossRef
  • Can red blood cell distribution width (RDW) predict clinical and endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis patients?
    Hüseyin PÜLAT, Serkan YALAKİ
    Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case Report on Ulcerative Colitis in 16 year girl
    MD.Salma MD.Salma, Y.Siva Y.Siva , , J.Bhargava Narendra , J.Bhargava Narendra
    World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research.2020; : 287.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of γδ T Cells in Intestinal Mucosa From Patients With Early-Onset or Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Their Correlation With Clinical Status
    Elena Lo Presti, Roberto Di Mitri, Filippo Mocciaro, Anna Barbara Di Stefano, Nunzia Scibetta, Elettra Unti, Giuseppe Cicero, Giulia Pecoraro, Elisabetta Conte, Francesco Dieli, Serena Meraviglia
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2019; 13(7): 873.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic scoring systems for the evaluation and monitoring of disease activity in Crohn's disease
    Lara Hart, Talat Bessissow
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2019; 38-39: 101616.     CrossRef
  • British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults
    Christopher Andrew Lamb, Nicholas A Kennedy, Tim Raine, Philip Anthony Hendy, Philip J Smith, Jimmy K Limdi, Bu’Hussain Hayee, Miranda C E Lomer, Gareth C Parkes, Christian Selinger, Kevin J Barrett, R Justin Davies, Cathy Bennett, Stuart Gittens, Malcolm
    Gut.2019; 68(Suppl 3): s1.     CrossRef
  • Novel oral-targeted therapies for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
    Elisabetta Antonelli, Vincenzo Villanacci, Gabrio Bassotti
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(47): 5322.     CrossRef
  • 11,740 View
  • 475 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Optimal Diagnostic Approaches for Patients with Suspected Small Bowel Disease
Jae Hyun Kim, Won Moon
Clin Endosc 2016;49(4):364-369.   Published online June 22, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.074
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
While the domain of gastrointestinal endoscopy has made great strides over the last several decades, endoscopic assessment of the small bowel continues to be challenging. Recently, with the development of new technology including video capsule endoscopy, device-assisted enteroscopy, and computed tomography/magnetic resonance enterography, a more thorough investigation of the small bowel is possible. In this article, we review the systematic approach for patients with suspected small bowel disease based on these advanced endoscopic and imaging systems.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Symptoms Contributing to the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Tumors
    Kozo Tsuruta, Hidetoshi Takedatsu, Shinichiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Yoshikai, Kensuke Tomiyasu, Masaru Morita, Kotaro Kuwaki, Keiichi Mitsuyama, Takumi Kawaguchi
    Digestion.2023; 104(6): 430.     CrossRef
  • Differentiation between small (< 4.5 cm) true subepithelial tumors and ectopic pancreas in the small bowel on computed tomography enterography
    Do Hoon Kim, Jae Hyun Kim, Seungchul Han, Hyo-Jin Kang, Se Hyung Kim
    European Radiology.2022; 32(3): 1760.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features of Small Bowel Tumors Diagnosed by Video Capsule Endoscopy and Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Single Center Experience
    Ah Young Yoo, Beom Jae Lee, Won Shik Kim, Seong Min Kim, Seung Han Kim, Moon Kyung Joo, Hyo Jung Kim, Jong-Jae Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography of Common Bowel Emergencies
    Kishan Patel, Nanxi Zha, Shana Neumann, Mitiadis Nicholas Tembelis, Mario Juliano, Naziya Samreen, Jawad Hussain, Mariam Moshiri, Michael N. Patlas, Douglas S. Katz
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2020; 55(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Roles of Capsule Endoscopy and Device-Assisted Enteroscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Small-Bowel Tumors
    Eun Ran Kim
    Clinical Endoscopy.2020; 53(4): 410.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and therapy using double-balloon endoscopy for small bowel disease: experience from a Chinese tertiary hospital
    Anning Yin, Wei Hu, Liang Zhao, Yijuan Ding, Honggang Yu
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020; 48(10): 030006052095948.     CrossRef
  • Role of endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding in real clinical practice: An evidence-based review
    Kyoungwon Jung, Won Moon
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2019; 11(2): 68.     CrossRef
  • 10,811 View
  • 176 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Observer Variability in Gastric Neoplasm Assessment Using the Vessel Plus Surface Classification for Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow Band Imaging
Chan Hui Yoo, Moo In Park, Seun Ja Park, Won Moon, Hyung Hun Kim, Jun Young Song, Do Hyun Kim
Clin Endosc 2014;47(1):74-78.   Published online January 24, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.1.74
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Recent studies have demonstrated that magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) facilitates differentiation of early gastric cancer from gastric adenoma using vessel plus surface (VS) classification. This study estimated the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of endoscopists using the Yao VS classification system for the gastric mucosal surface.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection, and selected cases in which preoperative ME-NBI was conducted. Before testing endoscopists, a 20-minute training module was given. Static ME-NBI images (n=47 cases) were presented to seven endoscopists (two experts and five trainees) who were asked to assess the images in 20 seconds using the Yao VS classification system. After 2 weeks, the endoscopists were asked to analyze the images again. The κ statistic was calculated for intraobserver and interobserver variability.

Results

The mean κ for intraobserver agreement was 0.69 (experts, 0.74; trainees, 0.64). The mean κ for interobserver agreement was 0.42 (experts, 0.49; trainees, 0.40).

Conclusions

We obtained reliable results as assessed by observer variability, with only brief training on VS classification. The VS classification appears to provide an objective assessment of ME-NBI for trainees who are not familiar with ME-NBI.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic support tool for early gastric cancers: Retrospective study
    Mitsuaki Ishioka, Hiroyuki Osawa, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Hiroshi Kawachi, Kaoru Nakano, Noriyoshi Fukushima, Mio Sakaguchi, Tomohiro Tada, Yusuke Kato, Junichi Shibata, Tsuyoshi Ozawa, Hisao Tajiri, Junko Fujisaki
    Digestive Endoscopy.2023; 35(4): 483.     CrossRef
  • Implementation of the updated Sydney system biopsy protocol improves the diagnostic yield of gastric preneoplastic conditions: Results from a real-world study
    Gonzalo Latorre, José Ignacio Vargas, Shailja C. Shah, Danisa Ivanovic-Zuvic, Pablo Achurra, Martín Fritzsche, Jai-Sen Leung, Bernardita Ramos, Elisa Jensen, Javier Uribe, Isabella Montero, Vicente Gandara, Camila Robles, Miguel Bustamante, Felipe Silva,
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of deep learning in the real-time diagnosis of gastric lesion based on magnifying optical enhancement videos
    Mingjun Ma, Zhen Li, Tao Yu, Guanqun Liu, Rui Ji, Guangchao Li, Zhuang Guo, Limei Wang, Qingqing Qi, Xiaoxiao Yang, Junyan Qu, Xiao Wang, Xiuli Zuo, Hongliang Ren, Yanqing Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The accuracy of magnifying narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) in distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous gastric lesions
    Fan Zhou, Liucheng Wu, Mingwei Huang, Qinwen Jin, Yuzhou Qin, Jiansi Chen
    Medicine.2018; 97(9): e9780.     CrossRef
  • Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging
    Takashi Kanesaka, Tsung-Chun Lee, Noriya Uedo, Kun-Pei Lin, Huai-Zhe Chen, Ji-Yuh Lee, Hsiu-Po Wang, Hsuan-Ting Chang
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(5): 1339.     CrossRef
  • Intra and interobserver agreement of narrow band imaging for the detection of head and neck tumors
    Anna Nogués-Sabaté, Francesc Xavier Aviles-Jurado, Laura Ruiz-Sevilla, Eduardo Lehrer, Alfonso Santamaría-Gadea, Meritxell Valls-Mateus, Isabel Vilaseca
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2018; 275(9): 2349.     CrossRef
  • Interobserver agreement in detection of “white globe appearance” and the ability of educational lectures to improve the diagnosis of gastric lesions
    Hitoshi Omura, Naohiro Yoshida, Tomoyuki Hayashi, Kazuhiro Miwa, Hajime Takatori, Hirokazu Tsuji, Katsuhisa Inamura, Yukihiro Shirota, Hiroyuki Aoyagi, Takaharu Masunaga, Kazuyoshi Katayanagi, Hiroshi Kurumaya, Shuichi Kaneko, Hisashi Doyama
    Gastric Cancer.2017; 20(4): 620.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Performance of Narrow Band Imaging for Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
    Changling Sun, Xue Han, Xiaoying Li, Yayun Zhang, Xiaodong Du
    Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.2017; 156(4): 589.     CrossRef
  • Predicting pre‐ and post‐resectional histologic discrepancies in gastric low‐grade dysplasia: A comparison of white‐light and magnifying endoscopy
    Jin Won Hwang, Young Seok Bae, Mi Seon Kang, Ji Hyun Kim, Sam Ryong Jee, Sang Heon Lee, Min Sung An, Kwang Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Bomi Kim, Sang Young Seol
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(2): 394.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic performance of magnifying narrow-band imaging for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
    Ying-Ying Hu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(25): 7884.     CrossRef
  • Interobserver Agreement in Using Magnifying Narrow Band Imaging System
    Il Ju Choi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Still and Moving Images in the Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions Using Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging in a Prospective Multicenter Trial
    Tomoyuki Hayashi, Hisashi Doyama, Yukihiro Shirota, Hirokazu Tsuji, Youhei Marukawa, Hajime Ohta, Kazuhiro Miwa, Takaharu Masunaga, Shuichi Terasaki, Yutaka Matano, Kunihiro Tsuji, Yoshibumi Kaneko, Toshihide Okada, Hiroshi Kurumaya, Shuichi Kaneko, John
    PLoS ONE.2014; 9(7): e100857.     CrossRef
  • 5,668 View
  • 41 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Successful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of a Low Esophageal Carcinoid Tumor
Chang Sup Lim, Seun Ja Park, Moo In Park, Won Moon, Hyung Hun Kim, Jun Sik Lee, Bong Jin Kim, Dong Young Ku
Clin Endosc 2013;46(5):576-578.   Published online September 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.576
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Esophageal carcinoid tumors remain some of the rarest of all carcinoid tumors, with only several cases previously reported in the literature. The endoscopic mucosal resection of selected carcinoid tumors has been shown to be a valid, safe, and effective method of treatment. Endoscopic ultrasonography is the technique of choice to select patients eligible for endoscopic resection. Here, we report successful endoscopic mucosal resection of a low esophageal carcinoid tumor and review the relevant literature. The present case is the first reported case of esophageal carcinoid tumor in Korea.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Harishankar Gopakumar, Vinay Jahagirdar, Jagadish Koyi, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Hemant Goyal, Neil R. Sharma, Abhilash Perisetti
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4175.     CrossRef
  • Contemporary outcomes of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction neuroendocrine tumors
    Lauren M Poston, Shreya Gupta, Christine E Alvarado, Jillian Sinopoli, Leonidas T Vargas, Philip A Linden, Christopher W Towe
    Diseases of the Esophagus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A rare rarity: Neuroendocrine tumor of the esophagus
    Elisa Giannetta, Valentina Guarnotta, Francesca Rota, Federica de Cicco, Federica Grillo, Annamaria Colao, Antongiulio Faggiano
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2019; 137: 92.     CrossRef
  • Incidental neuroendocrine tumor of the esophagus: A case report and review of the literature
    Sarah K. Findeis, Atin Agarwal
    Human Pathology: Case Reports.2019; 16: 100294.     CrossRef
  • A 13-year time trend analysis of 3724 small bowel video capsule endoscopies and a forecast model during the financial crisis in Greece
    Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Nikos Viazis, Panagiotis Tsibouris, Athanasios Tsigaridas, Periklis Apostolopoulos, John Anastasiou, Eleni Hounda, Ioannis Skianis, Konstantina Katopodi, Xhoela Ndini, George Alexandrakis, Demetrios G. Kar
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2017; 29(2): 185.     CrossRef
  • NASPGHAN Capsule Endoscopy Clinical Report
    Joel A. Friedlander, Quin Y. Liu, Benjamin Sahn, Koorosh Kooros, Catharine M. Walsh, Robert E. Kramer, Jenifer R. Lightdale, Julie Khlevner, Mark McOmber, Jacob Kurowski, Matthew J. Giefer, Harpreet Pall, David M. Troendle, Elizabeth C. Utterson, Herbert
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2017; 64(3): 485.     CrossRef
  • Quality Indicators for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
    Ki-Nam Shim, Seong Ran Jeon, Hyun Joo Jang, Jinsu Kim, Yun Jeong Lim, Kyeong Ok Kim, Hyun Joo Song, Hyun Seok Lee, Jae Jun Park, Ji Hyun Kim, Jaeyoung Chun, Soo Jung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Yang Won Min, Bora Keum, Bo-In Lee
    Clinical Endoscopy.2017; 50(2): 148.     CrossRef
  • Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the esophagus – Report of 14 cases from a single institute and review of the literature
    Francisco TUSTUMI, Flavio Roberto TAKEDA, Rodrigo Hideki UEMA, Guilherme Luiz Stelko PEREIRA, Rubens Antonio Aissar SALLUM, Ivan CECCONELLO
    Arquivos de Gastroenterologia.2017; 54(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • A Simple Evaluation Tool (ET-CET) Indicates Increase of Diagnostic Skills From Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Training Courses
    J.G. Albert, O. Humbla, M.E. McAlindon, C. Davison, U. Seitz, C. Fraser, F. Hagenmüller, E. Noetzel, C. Spada, M.E. Riccioni, J. Barnert, N. Filmann, M. Keuchel
    Medicine.2015; 94(43): e1941.     CrossRef
  • Training in Video Capsule Endoscopy
    Cary G. Sauer, Steven H. Erdman
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2015; 61(4): 381.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic resection using band ligation for esophageal SMT in less than 10 mm
    Joung Boom Hong
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(10): 2982.     CrossRef
  • 5,502 View
  • 46 Download
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Review
Optimal and Safe Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy
Won Moon
Clin Endosc 2013;46(3):219-223.   Published online May 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.219
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

Effective colonoscopy requires an adequate level of cleansing as a basic component. This review will describe a compact review about general considerations in bowel preparation for colonoscopy and specific considerations for various patients. A low-fiber diet instead of a regular diet on the day before colonoscopy is an independent predictor of adequate bowel preparation. Improved bowel cleansing does not result from the routine use of enemas or prokinetics in addition to oral bowel preparation. For morning colonoscopy, a split method of 4 L polyethylene glycol on the day before and the day of colonoscopy is recommended, while patients scheduled for afternoon colonoscopy typically receive a full method of 4 L polyethylene glycol on the day of the procedure. Valid alternatives are 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid or 2 L sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate. Although there are no statistically significant differences between polyethylene glycol and oral sodium phosphate for colon cleansing, polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation is advisable in most situations because of safety concerns.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Care of the hospitalised patient receiving peritoneal dialysis: Your questions answered
    Rehab B Albakr, Joanne M Bargman
    Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.2023; 43(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60–79: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sung Hoon Jung, Chul-Hyun Lim, Tae-Geun Gweon, Jinsu Kim, Jung Hwan Oh, Kyu-Tae Yoon, Jee Young An, Jeong‑Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2022; 67(10): 4841.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopy: an evidence-based approach
    Lucy Kelly
    Nursing Standard.2022; 37(4): 77.     CrossRef
  • Same-day single-dose vs large-volume split-dose regimens of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hui Pan, Xiao-Ling Zheng, Chao-Ying Fang, Lan-Zai Liu, Jian-Su Chen, Chao Wang, Yu-Dai Chen, Jian-Min Huang, Yu-Shen Zhou, Li-Ping He
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(22): 7844.     CrossRef
  • A case of severe acute hyponatremia after colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid bowel preparation
    Aki Yamada, Toshihiro Kanda, Toshiro Sugimoto
    CEN Case Reports.2022; 12(2): 254.     CrossRef
  • Oral Probiotics Alleviate Intestinal Dysbacteriosis for People Receiving Bowel Preparation
    Xiaorong Deng, Huakai Tian, Rong Yang, Yiwen Han, Kehong Wei, Cihua Zheng, Zhaoxia Liu, Tingtao Chen
    Frontiers in Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Youn I Choi, Jong-Joon Lee, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Dong Kyun Park, Kwang An Kwon
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3286.     CrossRef
  • Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Li-Juan Yi, Xu Tian, Bing Shi, Hui Chen, Xiao-Ling Liu, Yuan-Ping Pi, Wei-Qing Chen
    Frontiers in Medicine.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Bowel Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, Bowel Movement Kinetics, and Patient Tolerability of Same-Day and Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Using 4 L of Polyethylene Glycol: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Myeongsook Seo, Tae-Geun Gweon, Cheal Wung Huh, Jeong Seon Ji, Hwang Choi
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1518.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy
    Li-Juan Yi, Xu Tian, Yuan-Ping Pi, Ling Feng, Hui Chen, Xiao-Ling Liu, Wei-Qing Chen
    Medicine.2018; 97(17): e0599.     CrossRef
  • Magnesium and Drugs Commonly Used in Chronic Kidney Disease
    Jeffrey H. William, Katelyn Richards, John Danziger
    Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease.2018; 25(3): 267.     CrossRef
  • Severe symptomatic hyponatremia associated with the use of polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation
    Navira Samad, Ian Fraser
    Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The safety and effectiveness of 2-liter polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid in patients with liver cirrhosis
    Jae Min Lee, Jae Hyung Lee, Eun Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, In Kyung Yoo, Seung Han Kim, Hyuk Soon Choi, Bora Keum, Yeon Seok Seo, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hong Sik Lee, Hoon Jai Chun, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim
    Medicine.2017; 96(51): e9011.     CrossRef
  • Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ji Cheng, Kaixiong Tao, Xiaoming Shuai, Jinbo Gao
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(9): 4033.     CrossRef
  • Increased Risk of Adverse Renal Outcome Following Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparation Compared to Sodium Picosulfate
    Aiden R. Liu, Amit X. Garg, Kuan Liu, Salimah Z. Shariff, Arsh K. Jain, Matthew A. Weir
    The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2016; 56(8): 983.     CrossRef
  • Soins péri-opératoires en chirurgie colorectale. En pratique, que faire?
    C. Hobeika, J. H. Lefevre
    Côlon & Rectum.2015; 9(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Renal risk associated with sodium phosphate medication: safe in healthy individuals, potentially dangerous in others
    Iva Hoffmanová, Pavel Kraml, Michal Anděl
    Expert Opinion on Drug Safety.2015; 14(7): 1097.     CrossRef
  • Miralax With Gatorade for Bowel Preparation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sameer Siddique, Kristi T Lopez, Alisha M Hinds, Dina S Ahmad, Douglas L Nguyen, Michelle L Matteson-Kome, Srinivas R Puli, Matthew L Bechtold
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 109(10): 1566.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Phosphate Tablets and Polyethylene Glycol Solution for Bowel Cleansing in Healthy Korean Adults
    Seung-Hwa Lee, Duck-Joo Lee, Kwang-Min Kim, Sang-Wook Seo, Joon-Koo Kang, Eun-Hye Lee, Dong-Ryul Lee
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2014; 55(6): 1542.     CrossRef
  • Préparation colique : quand ? comment ? avec quoi ?
    A. Laforest, J. H. Lefevre
    Côlon & Rectum.2014; 8(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • 9,325 View
  • 141 Download
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Effectiveness of Premedication with Pronase for Visualization of the Mucosa during Endoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Gyu Jin Lee, Seun Ja Park, Sun Jung Kim, Hyung Hun Kim, Moo In Park, Won Moon
Clin Endosc 2012;45(2):161-164.   Published online June 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.2.161
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background/Aims

Gastric mucus should be removed before endoscopic examination to increase visibility. In this study, the effectiveness of premedication with pronase for improving visibility during endoscopy was investigated.

Methods

From April 2010 to February 2011, 400 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive endoscopy with one of four premedications as follows: dimethylpolysiloxane (DMPS), pronase and sodium bicarbonate with 10 minutes premedication time (group A, n=100), DMPS and sodium bicarbonate with 10 minutes premedication time (group B, n=100), DMPS, pronase and sodium bicarbonate with 20 minutes premedication time (group C, n=100), and DMPS and sodium bicarbonate with 20 minute premedication time (group D, n=100). One endoscopist, who was unaware of the premedication types, calculated the visibility scores (range, 1 to 3) of the antrum, lower gastric body, upper gastric body and fundus. The sum of the scores from the four locations was defined as the total visibility score.

Results

Group C showed significantly lower scores than other groups (p=0.002). Group C also had the lowest frequency of flushing, which was significantly lower than that of group D. Groups C and D had significantly shorter durations of examination than groups A and B.

Conclusions

Using pronase 20 minutes before endoscopy significantly improved endoscopic visualization and decreased the frequency of water flushing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of Premedication With Pronase Before Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Jun Li, Lan Wang, Weiling Hu, Jiaguo Wu, Hongtan Chen, Liangjing Wang, Bin Lv, Xiaofeng Zhang, Yiyang Dai, Zhiming Huang, Zhenzhai Cai, Xiaoyun Ding, Liping Ye, Jin Ding, Lijuan Xiang, Bin Ye, Shujie Chen, Jianmin Si
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2024; 58(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Using Premedication of Simethicone/Pronase With or Without Postural Change on Visualization of the Mucosa Before Endoscopy: A Prospective, Double Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Li Cao, Fangqin Zheng, Deqiong Wang, Li Chen, Xinxia Feng, Zhenzhen Zhou, Jingmei Liu, Mi Wang, Qiaozhen Guo, Mei Liu
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2024; 15(2): e00625.     CrossRef
  • Cáncer gástrico de intervalo: un llamado a la atención y a la acción
    R. Castaño-Llano, A. Piñeres, R. Jaramillo, S. Molina, F. Aristizábal, J.E. Puerta
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México.2023; 88(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Interval gastric cancer: A call to attentiveness and action
    R. Castaño-Llano, A. Piñeres, R. Jaramillo, S. Molina, F. Aristizábal, J.E. Puerta
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition).2023; 88(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Pre-procedure oral administration of pronase improves efficacy of lugol chromoendoscopy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma screening: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Xin Zhao, Meng Guo, Shaohua Zhu, Linhui Zhang, Tao Dong, Hui Luo, Weihua Yu, Jiangyi Zhu, Xiaotong Fan, Ying Han, Zhiguo Liu
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(6): 4421.     CrossRef
  • Translation from manual to automatic endoscopic insufflation enhanced by a pressure limiter
    Yuki Ushimaru, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tomoki Makino, Yukinori Kurokawa, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(9): 7038.     CrossRef
  • Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    Sang Yoon Kim, Jae Myung Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2022; 55(3): 319.     CrossRef
  • Chinese integrated guideline on the management of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions
    Ping Wang, Peng Li, Yingxuan Chen, Li Li, Yuanyuan Lu, Weixun Zhou, Liqun Bian, Beihua Zhang, Xiaolan Yin, Junxiang Li, Jie Chen, Shutian Zhang, Yongquan Shi, Xudong Tang
    Chinese Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing simethicone, N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate and peppermint for visualization in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Prasit Mahawongkajit, Amonpon Kanlerd
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(1): 303.     CrossRef
  • Cohortes de premedicación en endoscopia alta con Simeticona, N-acetylcisteina, Hedera helix y validación de escala visual
    Camilo de Jesús Blanco Avellaneda, María Isabel Barreto-Guevara, Yenny Lucía Walteros-Gordillo, Néstor Armando Pinzón-Segura, María del Carmen Rivera-Velasco, José Bareño-Silva
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2021; 36(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Premedication with reformulated simethicone and sodium bicarbonate improves mucosal visibility during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Xueqin Chen, Ning Dai, Yanyong Deng, Xin Sun, Mingqing Zhang, Jie Pan, Zhiming Huang, Guoliang Ye, Jianmin Si, Lan Wang, Shujie Chen
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Documento de posicionamiento de la AEG, la SEED y la SEAP sobre calidad de la endoscopia digestiva alta para la detección y vigilancia de las lesiones precursoras de cáncer gástrico
    Glòria Fernández-Esparrach, José Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Pilar Díez Redondo, Henar Núñez, Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Pedro Rosón, Xavier Calvet, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Joaquín Cubiella, Leticia Moreira, M. Luisa Pardo López, Ángeles Pérez Aisa, José Miguel
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2021; 44(6): 448.     CrossRef
  • Quality in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the detection and surveillance of gastric cancer precursor lesions: Position paper of AEG, SEED and SEAP
    Glòria Fernández-Esparrach, José Carlos Marín-Gabriel, Pilar Díez Redondo, Henar Núñez, Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, Pedro Rosón, Xavier Calvet, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Joaquín Cubiella, Leticia Moreira, M. Luisa Pardo López, Ángeles Pérez Aisa, José Miguel
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2021; 44(6): 448.     CrossRef
  • Pre-Endoscopy Drink of Simethicone and N-Acetylcysteine Significantly Improves Visualization in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Shrihari Anil Anikhindi, Ashish Kumar, Noriya Uedo, Vikas Singla, Akshay Anikhindi, Praveen Sharma, Naresh Bansal, Piyush Ranjan, Mandhir Kumar, Munish Sachdeva, Shivam Khare, Anil Arora
    Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2021; 12(01): 011.     CrossRef
  • Guidelines for endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer
    Kenshi Yao, Noriya Uedo, Tomoari Kamada, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Takashi Nagahama, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Masashi Oka, Kazuhiko Inoue, Katsuhiro Mabe, Takashi Yao, Masahiro Yoshida, Isao Miyashiro, Kazuma Fujimoto, Hisao Tajiri
    Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 32(5): 663.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Position Change Improves Gastric Cleanliness for Magnetically Controlled Capsule Gastroscopy
    Yuan-Chen Wang, Jun Pan, Xi Jiang, Xiao-Ju Su, Wei Zhou, Wen-Bin Zou, Yang-Yang Qian, Yi-Zhi Chen, Xiao Liu, Jin Yu, Xiao-Nan Yan, An-Jing Zhao, Zhao-Shen Li, Zhuan Liao
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2019; 64(5): 1297.     CrossRef
  • An Asian consensus on standards of diagnostic upper endoscopy for neoplasia
    Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Noriya Uedo, Rajvinder Singh, Takuji Gotoda, Enders Kwok Wai Ng, Kenshi Yao, Tiing Leong Ang, Shiaw Hooi Ho, Daisuke Kikuchi, Fang Yao, Rapat Pittayanon, Kenichi Goda, James Y W Lau, Hisao Tajiri, Haruhiro Inoue
    Gut.2019; 68(2): 186.     CrossRef
  • Gastric preparation for magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy: A prospective, randomized single-blinded controlled trial
    Shu-Guang Zhu, Yang-Yang Qian, Xin-Ying Tang, Qian-Qian Zhu, Wei Zhou, Han Du, Wei An, Xiao-Ju Su, An-Jing Zhao, Hey-Long Ching, Mark Edward McAlindon, Zhao-Shen Li, Zhuan Liao
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2018; 50(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of using premedication with simethicone/Pronase during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination with sedation: A single center, prospective, single blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Ling‐Ye Zhang, Wen‐Yan Li, Ming Ji, Fu‐Kun Liu, Guang‐Yong Chen, Shan‐Shan Wu, Qian Hao, Hui‐Hong Zhai, Shu‐Tian Zhang
    Digestive Endoscopy.2018; 30(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Effect of premedication on lesion detection rate and visualization of the mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter large sample randomized controlled double-blind study
    X. Liu, C. T. Guan, L. Y. Xue, S. He, Y. M. Zhang, D. L. Zhao, Y. Li, F. G. Liu, J. Li, Y. F. Liu, A. S. Ling, W. Q. Wei, G. Q. Wang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(8): 3548.     CrossRef
  • Upper gastrointestinal tract capsule endoscopy using a nurse-led protocol: First reported experience
    Hey-Long Ching, Ailish Healy, Victoria Thurston, Melissa F Hale, Reena Sidhu, Mark E McAlindon
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(26): 2893.     CrossRef
  • Differences in routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy between Japanese and international facilities: A questionnaire survey
    Noriya Uedo, Takuji Gotoda, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Tokuma Tanuma, Yoshinori Morita, Hisashi Doyama, Akira Aso, Toshiaki Hirasawa, Tomonori Yano, Norihisa Uchita, Shiaw‐Hooi Ho, Ping‐Hsin Hsieh
    Digestive Endoscopy.2016; 28(S1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Variation in preparation for gastroscopy: lessons towards safer and better outcomes
    J L Callaghan, J R Neale, P C Boger, A P Sampson, P Patel
    Frontline Gastroenterology.2016; 7(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Current and future role of magnetically assisted gastric capsule endoscopy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
    Hey-Long Ching, Melissa Fay Hale, Mark Edward McAlindon
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2016; 9(3): 313.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of small-volume simethicone given at least 30 min before gastroscopy
    Mingjun Song, Andrew Boon Eu Kwek, Ngai Moh Law, Jeannie Peng Lan Ong, Jessica Yi-Lyn Tan, Prem Harichander Thurairajah, Daphne Shih Wen Ang, Tiing Leong Ang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics.2016; 7(4): 572.     CrossRef
  • Additive Effect of Pronase on the Eradication Rate of First-Line Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection
    Chang Seok Bang, Yeon Soo Kim, Sang Hyun Park, Jin Bong Kim, Gwang Ho Baik, Ki Tae Suk, Jai Hoon Yoon, Dong Joon Kim
    Gut and Liver.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of pronase as mucolytic agent on imaging quality of magnifying endoscopy
    Gwang Ha Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(8): 2483.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Pronase Premedication on Narrow-Band Imaging Endoscopy in Patients with Precancerous Conditions of Stomach
    Jae Myung Cha, Kyu Yeoun Won, Il-Kwun Chung, Gwang Ha Kim, Sun-Young Lee, Yoo Kyung Cho
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2014; 59(11): 2735.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of simethicone and N‐acetylcysteine as premedication in improving visibility during upper endoscopy
    Wei‐Kuo Chang, Ming‐Kung Yeh, Hsuang‐Chun Hsu, Hsuan‐Wei Chen, Ming‐Kuan Hu
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2014; 29(4): 769.     CrossRef
  • Gastric Preparation for Upper Endoscopy
    Il Ju Choi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2012; 45(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • 6,220 View
  • 99 Download
  • 30 Crossref
Close layer

Clin Endosc : Clinical Endoscopy Twitter Facebook
Close layer
TOP